The Grammaticalization of the Spanish Construction lo que pasa es que: From Lexical Reference to Subjectification

Philip P. Limerick

Abstract


The construction lo que pasa es que ‘what happens is that’ is a Spanish discourse marker that was originally a pseudo-cleft construction. Before becoming grammaticalized, the verb pasar contained its full lexical meaning ‘to happen,’ but later evolved into a fixed expression losing its lexical meaning and acquiring an implicit contrastive and causal meaning. The present study aims to describe the construction’s evolution on the path of grammaticalization in relation to Traugott’s (1989) three semantic-pragmatic tendencies. In addition, a Usage-based Theory approach is employed in order to describe some of the formal aspects of the construction. Using two corpora, CORDE and Corpus del Español, all instances of the construction were located and analyzed with regard to function and usage in context. Results indicate that the construction was first used in the 16th Century and that its evolution as lexical > concessive > epistemic is in line with Traugott’s tendencies. Mechanisms of change such as chunking and phonetic reduction and loss of compositionality and analyzability, as well as increase in overall frequency are also discussed in relation to this construction, lending further support to Usage-based theory.

Keywords


Spanish, Grammaticalization, Usage-based Theory, Semantic-Pragmatic, Subjectification, Discourse Markers, Corpus Linguistics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alamillo, A. R. (2011). The pragmatic meaning of the Spanish construction lo que pasa es que. Journal of Pragmatics 43.1435-1450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.015

Bybee, J. L. (2011). Usage based theory and grammaticalization. In Narrog, H. & Heine, B. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 69-78. Oxford University Press.

Davies, M. (2002). Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s-1900s. http://www.corpusdelespanol.org

Diewald, G. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.) New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 103-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die

Hoffmann, S. (2005). Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-based Study. London: Routledge.

Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Howe, C. (2011). Structural autonomy in grammaticalization: Leveling and retention with Spanish hacer+time. Probus 23. 247-282. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2011.007

Howe, C. (2013). The Spanish perfects: Pathways of emergent meaning. Springer.

Howe, C. & Schwenter, S. A. (2003). Present perfect for preterit across Spanish dialects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 9. 61–75.

Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, 101-124. New York: Wiley.

Real academia española: Banco de datos (CORDE) Corpus diacrónico del español. http://www.rae.es [2021].

Romera, M. (2008). La formación de una unidad funcional discursiva: lo que en el castellano de Mallorca. In Sinner, C. & Wesch, A. (eds.), El castellano en las tierras de habla catalana, 199-218. Vervuert Verlagsgesellschaft/Iberoamericana, Frankfurt/Madrid.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.3.p.90

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.