Speech and Thought Presentation in Chance by Alice Munro: A Stylistic Analysis

Zeravan Ayoub Ahmed Zebari, Behbood Mohammadzadeh

Abstract


This study analyses the speech and thought presentation in Chance, a short story written by Alice Munro. The study aims to analyse how the speech and thought of the characters in the short story are presented. The concept of speech and thought presentation is dubious and complex. This study distinguishes speech and thought presentation and identifies either the characters responsible for representing their speech and thought or the narrator whose speech or thought gets to represent in Munro’s short story. The present study follows the speech and thought presentation techniques of Leech and Short (2007). The present study found out how the author used the categories of speech and thought presentation in the short story with all of their categories except DT. The findings of the study revealed a total of 293 speech and thought presentations in the short story. 235 presentations belong to speech presentations, and 58 to thought presentations. FDS and DS are the most occurred speech presentation within the short story which enabled the author to make her characters seem independent of the narrator. The FDS technique suggests that the context of speech in the story is clear enough, referring to whom the speakers are. FIS is the least occurred presentation within the short story. Besides, DT is not found in the whole short story. Munro has given the importance to the external speech rather than internal thought. The study results indicate that wareness towards speech and thought presentations leads to a better understanding of the literary texts.

Keywords


Speech, Thought, Presentation, Stylistics, Alice Munro, Selected Short Story

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, H. P. (2002). The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burke, M. (Ed). (2014). The Routledge handbook of stylistics. London: Routledge.

Fludernik, M. (2009). An Introduction to Narratology. London: Routledge.

Guo, H. (2017). Free Indirect Thought in Stream-of-Consciousness Fiction: A Textural Cohesive Perspective. International Journal Of English Linguistics, 7(6), 38-46. doi: 10.5539/ijel.v7n6p38

Hakemulder, F. (2020). Finding Meaning Through Literature: Foregrounding as an Emergent Effect. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 31.1: 91-110.

Leech, G. & Short, M. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd ed). Harlow: Pearson.

Munro, A. (2004). Runaway: Chance. New York: Vintage Books.

Page, R & Busse, B & Nørgaard, N. (2019). Rethinking Language,Text and Context Interdisciplinary Research in Stylistics in Honour of Michael Toolan. New York: Routledge.

Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2002). Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (2nd ed). London: Routledge.

Riissanen, A., & Watson, G. (2014). Gender Difference in the Use of Thought Representation: A Corpus-Based Study. English Language Teaching, 7(3). doi: 10.5539/elt.v7n3p71

Schmid, W. (2010). Narratology: An Introduction. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Segundo, P. & Caballero, G. (2016). Stylistics in Use. UK, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Short, M. (1996). Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays, and Prose. London: Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.

Semino, E., & Short, M., (2004). Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing, and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.

Thompson, G. (1996). Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied linguistics, 17(4), 501-530.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.1.p.77

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.