An Error Analysis of Research Project Abstracts Written by Thai Undergraduate Students

Wirada Amnuai

Abstract


Errors in writing are unavoidable while students are trying to develop their writing skills. There have been several studies on identifying writing problems or errors in students’ writing. It is believed that identifying students’ written tasks is an effective tool to explore the difficulties involved in learning language. This helps teachers’ awareness of the serious problems which occur in students’ writing and allows them to pay closer attention to their errors. The aim of the present research study is to pinpoint writing errors in English abstracts written by Thai undergraduate students. Forty abstracts of research projects were collected and analysed. The error analysis was conducted at the sentence level, word level, and mechanics aspect. The five most frequent error types ranking from the most frequent to least frequent were word choice, preposition, sentence construction, singular or plural forms and quotation marks. The findings of the present study have shed light on the students’ writing ability and give an insight into what the problems students face when writing their abstracts. Also, the errors found in the abstracts in the present study have pedagogical implications concerning English language learning, particularly with writing courses. The findings will be helpful for teachers to develop teaching materials to assist their students from committing errors when writing English abstracts and to improve academic writing skills.

Keywords


Error Analysis, Abstract, English Language Writing, Research Project, Academic Writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhaisoni, E., Gaudel, D. R., & Al-Zuoud, K.M. (2017). Article errors in the English writing of the Saudi EFL preparatory year students. Advance in Language and Literary Studies. 8(1), 72-78.

Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2014). Error Analysis of Written English Paragraphs by Jordanian Undergraduate Students: A Case Study. International of English Language. Literature, and Humanities, 2(8), 85-100.

Altınmakas, D. Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88-103.

Ander, S., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2010). Lexical errors in elementary level EFL learners’ compositions Abstract. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 5299–5303.

Arakkitsakul, Y. (2019). Five things that Thai teachers have to consider before teaching English grammar. Journal of Southern Technology, 12(2), 257-263.

Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. Great Britain: Blackwell Publishers Limited.

Chuenchaichon, Y. (2015). A review of EFL writing research studies in Thailand in the past 10 years. Journal of Humanities Naresuan University, 11(1), 13-30.

Coder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Darus, S. & Subramanian, K. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essay of secondary school students in Malasia: A Case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495

Erkaya, O. R. (2012). Vocabulary and L1 Interference – Error Analysis of Turkish Students' English Essays. Mextesol Journal, 36(2), 1-11.

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of Error in Second language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Gass, S., and Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Heaton, J. (1990). Classroom Testing. London: Longman.

Henry, A., Roseberry, R. L. (2007). Language errors in the genre-based writing of advanced academic ESL students. RELC,38(2), 171-198.

Iamsiu, C. (2014). An analysis of grammatical errors in Srinakharinwirot university students’ writing. Master’s Thesis. Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

Jogthong, C. (2001). Research article introductions in Thai: genre analysis of academic writing. Ph. D. Dissertation, West Virginia University, West Virginia.

Johnson, A. C., Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R.D.(2017). College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics. Assessing Writing, 34, 72- 84.

Khansir, A. A. (2016). A Study of Written Grammatical Errors of Iranian EFL Learners at Undergraduate Level. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 268-273.

K1rkgöz, Y. (2010). An analysis of written errors of Turkish adult learners of English. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4352-4358.

Littlewood, W. (1997). Self-access: why do we want it and what can it do? In P.Benson & P.Voller (eds.). Autonomy & independence in language learning. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.

Lee, S. (2005). Facilitating and inhibiting factor in English as a foreign language writing performance: A model testing with structural equation modeling. Language Learning, 55(2), 335-371.

Klimova, B. F. (2013). Common mistakes in writing abstracts in English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 512-516.

Olasehinde, M. O. (2002). Error analysis and remedial pedagogy. In Babatunde S. T. & D. S. Adeyanju (eds.). Language, meaning and society. Ilorin: Itaytee Press and Publishing Co., Nigeria.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English (4th ed). New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.

Promsupa, P. Varasarin, P., & Brudhiprabha, P. (2017). An analysis of grammatical errors in English writing of Thai university students. HRD Journal, 8(1), 93-104.

Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., and Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. Pearson Education Limited. London: Longman

Salehi, M., & Bahrami, V. (2018). An error analysis of journal papers written by Persian authors. Cogent Arts & Humanities,5(1), 1-16.

Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., Pochakorn, R. (2017). An analysis of errors in written English sentences: A case study of Thai EFL students. English Language Teaching, 10(3). 101-110.

Seitova, M. (2016). Error analysis of written production: The case of 6th grade students of Kazakhstani school. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 287-293.

Sharp, J. (2012). Success with your Education Research Project (2nd ed). London: SAGE Publications, Inc

Sihombing, Nissa, A. K., & Estrelita, A. (2015). Students’ Written production error analysis in the EFL classroom teaching: A study of adult English learners errors. LLT Journal, 18(2), 125-132.

Sompong, M. (2014). Error analysis. Thammasat Review, 16(2), 109-127.

Sukasame, N. Kantho, S., & Narrot, P. (2014). A study of errors in learning English Grammatical structures on Tensesof MatthayomSuksa 4 Students of The Demonstration School, KhonKaen University. Procedia-Social and Behavior Sciences, 116, 1934-1939.

Thongrin, S. (2000). Growth L2 writing: A case study of an ESL student writer. Thai

TESOL Bulletin, 13(2), 35-46.

Thep-Ackrapong, T. (2005). Teaching English in Thailand: An uphill battle. Journal of Humanities Parithat, Srinakharinwirot University, 27(1), 51-62.

Watcharapunyawong, S. & Usaha, S. (2013). Thai EFL Students’ Writing Errors in Different Text Types: The Interference of the First Language. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67-78.

Weissberg, R., and Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: experimental research report writing for students of English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.4p.13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.