The Effect of ECRIF Taxonomy in Foreign Language Teaching on Academic Achievement

Büşra Dalkıran, Çetin Semerci

Abstract


The aim of this study is to determine the effect of ECRIF taxonomy in foreign language teaching on academic achievement. For this purpose, this study has been carried out with 56 students at 4th grade of primary education in 2018–2019 academic years. In the research, pretest posttest control group design of experiment method has been used. This study covered a period of 5 weeks and the unit of “Cartoon Characters” in English lesson. As data collection tool, achievement test for listening and speaking which was developed by the researcher was used. In the analysis of data, pretest and posttest scores were compared by using t-test for dependent groups. In addition, to explain power of relation, effect size (Cohens’ d) values were calculated. As a result of study, it was stated that ECRIF taxonomy provided significant differences in students’ academic success in favour of the experimental group.

Keywords


Education, ECRIF Taxonomy, Teaching Foreign Language, Academic Achievement, Primary Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrejo, B., Sartaj, S. & Memon, S. (2019). English Language Teaching through Communicative Approach: A Qualitative Study of Public Sector Colleges of Hyderabad, Sindh. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 43-49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.5p.43

AlSaleem, B. I. A. (2018). The effect of ECRIF strategy on EFL seventh graders’ vocabulary learning and retention. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 70-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.5

Arung, F., Rafli, Z. & Dewanti, R. (2019). Ontological Concept for the Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(5), 50-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.5p.50

Brawn, J. (2009). Scaffolding in a productive skill lesson. Proceedings of the 17th Annual KOTESOL International Conference. 24–25 October 2009. Seoul, Korea.

Calvo, A. S. (2007). A learner-centred approach to the teaching of English as an L2. ES: Revista de Filologia Inglesa, 28, 189-196.

Çelikkaya, T. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının kullandıkları öğrenme stratejileri (Pre-service Social Sciences studies students’ use of learning strategies). Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 11(3), 65-84.

Dinçer, B. (2013). 7. Sınıf İngilizce öğretim programının Stufflebeam’in bağlam-girdi-süreç-ürün (CIPP) modeline göre değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of 7th grade English language curriculum according to Stufflebeam’s CIPP model). (Unpublished Phd Thesis), Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.

Edwards, E. & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher action research: achieving sustainability, ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv060

Er, K. O. (2006). Evaluation of English curricula in 4th and 5th grade primary schools. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 39(2), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000137

Fergusson, J. Y. (2003). A regression analysis of problem-based learning student variables. ETD collection for University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AAI3116573. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3116573

Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J. & Akey, T. M. (2000). Using SPSS for window: Analyzing and understanding data. New Jersey: PracticeHall.

Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (Scientific research method). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.

Kurzweil, J. & Scholl, M. (2007). School for international training frameworks for language teaching: Understanding teaching through learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lin, C. C. (2016). Encounters of the collaborative kind: when SIOP meets ECRIF. Idiom Summer, 46(3), 7-10.

Mezied, S. K. M. (2017). The effectiveness of using ECRIF and PPP strategies in fifth graders’ vocabulary learning and its retention. (Unpublished Master Thesis), The Islamic University/Faculty of Education, Gaza.

Phan, N. L. H. (2018). Implications of the changing status of English for instructional models of English: A study of Vietnamese ELT teachers’ reflections, TESOL Journal, 9(2), 368-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesj.331

Thomas, J. (2019). Ubby's Underdogs, a New Vision for Australia and the Future of English Teaching, English in Australia, 54(1), 53-58.

Tirira, L. C. E. M. (2013). ECRIF in the English classroom: students perceptions regarding its implementation. (Final Report of the Research), Pontificia Universidad Catolıca Del Ecuador, Ibarra.

Tok, H. & Arıbaş S. (2008). Avrupa birliğine uyum sürecinde yabancı dil öğretimi (Teaching foreign language during adaptation process to European Union). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(15), 205–227.

Tosuncuoğlu, İ. (2017). ECRIF framework system. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(3), 130-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i3.2175

Walker, R. (2019). Teaching English as a Lingua Franca: The Journey from EFL to ELF, ELT Journal, (73) 4, 483–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz033

Yurdakul, B. (2005). Yapılandırmacılık (Constructivizm). Demirel, Ö. (Ed.), Eğitimde yeni yönelimler (39-65). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.4p.7

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.