Religious Reformation and the Crisis of Providentialism in Cyril Tourneur’s The Atheist’s Tragedy (1611): A Cultural Materialist Reading

Shahab Entezareghaem

Abstract


The early modern period in England is characterised by philosophical and moral debates over the meaning and pertinence of Christian beliefs and teachings. One of the most controversial topics in this epoch is God’s providence and its supposed impacts on man’s daily life. In the wake of the Reformation and emerging philosophical schools, particularly in the second half of the sixteenth century, Providentialism was seriously put into question and the meaning and influences of God’s providence were, therefore, investigated. Epicureans and Calvinists were two prominent groups of religious reformists who cast doubt upon the validity and pertinence of Christian Providentialism as it was taught during the medieval period. These intellectual and philosophical debates were reflected in the literary productions of the age in general, and in Elizabethan and Jacobean drama in particular. Cyril Tourneur is one of the early modern English playwrights who inquired into the meaning and relevance of Providentialism in his last play, The Atheist’s Tragedy (1611). Adhering to a cultural materialist mode of criticism, I will show in this paper that Tourneur is a dissident dramatist who separates the realm of God’s divinity from man’s rational capacity in his tragedy and anticipates, hence, the emergence and development of new religious and philosophical visions in the Renaissance.

Keywords


Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama, Providentialism, Reformation, Epicurean Philosophy, Calvinism, Cultural Materialism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bostocke, R. (1585). The Difference betwene the Auncient Phisicke; first taught by the godly forefathers, consisting in vnitie, peace and concord: and the latter Phisicke proceeding from Idolaters, as Gallen, consisting in dualitie, discorde, and contrarietie. And wherein the naturall philosophie of Aristotle doth differ from the trueth of Gods Worde. London.

Calvin, J. [1559] (2009). Institutes of the Christian Religion. Henry Beveridge (Trans.). (Second Printing). 4 Books. Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers. (Reprinted from Institutes of the Christian Religion. London: Reinolde Wolf & Richarde Harisson: 1559).

Cooper, Th. (1589). An Admonition to the People of England: Wherein Are Answered Not Onely the Slaunderous Vuntruethes Reprochfully Vttered by Martin the Libeller, but also Many Other Crimes by Some of His Broode, Obieceted Generally Against All Bishops, and the Chiefe of the Cleargie, Purposely to Deface and Discredite the Present State of the Church. London: Christopher Baker.

Dollimore, J. [1984] (2010). Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dollimore, J., Sinfield, A. (Eds.). [1985] (2012). Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Donne, J. (2006). Selected Poems. I. Bell (Ed.). London and New York: Penguin.

Elton, W. R. [1966] (2014). King Lear and the Gods. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.

Festugière, A. J. [1956] (2009). Epicurus and His Gods. C. W. Chilton (Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hall, M. B. [1962] (2011). The Scientific Renaissance 1450-1630. New York: Dover Publications.

Heitsch, D. B. (2000). Practising Reform in Montaigne's Essais. Leiden: Brill.

Hill, Ch. [1965] (1997). Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution. Revisited Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hotson, L. [1931] (2003). Shakespeare Versus Shallow. Montana: Kessinger Publishing.

Lodge, Th. (1883). The Complete Works of Thomas Lodge (1580-1623?) Now First Collected, ed. by E. Gosse (Ed.). 4 vols. Glasgow: Hunterian Club.

Martin, A. V. [1944] (2016). Sociology of the Renaissance. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Miernowski, J. (2016). 'Montaigne on Truth and Skepticism'. In P. Desan (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Montaigne. New York: Oxford University Press.

Montaigne, M. (1958). The Complete Essays of Montaigne. D. M. Frame (Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Ornstein, R. (1954). 'The Atheist's Tragedy and Renaissance Naturalism'. Studies in Philology 51.

Otto, R. [1923] (2015). The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational. J. W. Harvey (Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

Primaudaye, P. (1577). Académie Françoise. Lyon: Iean Veirat.

Sainte-Marthe, Ch. (1550). In Psalmum Nonagesimum. Lutetiae Parisiorum.

Shapin, S. (1996). The Scientific Revolution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Surtz, E. L. (June 1949). 'Epicurus in Utopia'. ELH 16. 2.

Tourneur, C. (1978). The Plays of Cyril Tourneur. G. Parfitt (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Viret, P. (1564). Instruction Chrétienne, 3 vols. Geneve: 1564.

Wolfreys, J., Robbins, R., Womack, K. (2006). Key Concepts in Literary Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.2p.65

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.