The Role and Significance of Law No. 24 / 2009 and its Implications for the Javanese Language: A Case Study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Lusia Neti Harwati

Abstract


Calls for more holistic research, especially ones that deal with law and its implications for local languages, have increased in recent years. The present study used narrative research design to investigate the beliefs and experiences of one participant about his role in preserving a local language in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In other words, the purpose of this study was to describe the life of the participant, collect and tell stories about the participant’s life, and then write narratives of his experiences by proposing two research questions: (1) how can the possible impacts of Law No.24 / 2009 on Javanese language be managed? and (2) what specific strategies have the potential to result in more effective Javanese language preservation and promotion in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia? The findings revealed that revitalization and development of Javanese language and literature and also provincial government responses to Javanese language and script crisis could be considered as solutions. More specifically, fostering cultural activities with stakeholders in both academic and non-academic domains was the way to prevent the possible negative effects of Law No. 24 / 2009 on Javanese language. It was also observed that initiating an Act could be the best strategy to revitalize Javanese language and script. These findings suggest that Center for Language and the provincial government have an important concern to respect Javanese language and culture.

Keywords


Javanese Language, Language Revitalization, Indonesian, Identity, Culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, W. (2016). Ethnolinguistic study of local wisdom in ex-residency of surakarta. Humaniora, 28(3), 279-289.

Academic draft of javanese language and script revitalization act. (2019). Yogyakarta: CV. Tri Matra.

Adhabi, E., & Anozie, C.B. (2017). Literature review for the type of interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 86-97.

Alshehri, A.A. (2016). Language revival: significance, strategies, methods and issues. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 4(6), 53-65.

Carjuzaa, J. (2017). Revitalizing indigenous languages, cultures, and histories in montana, across the united states and around the globe. Cogent Education, 4, 1-12.

Cohn, A.C., & Ravindranath, M. (2014). Local languages in indonesia: language maintenance or language shift? Linguistik Indonesia, 32(2), 131-148.

Costa, J. Is language really about saving languages? some insights from 150 years of language revival in occitania. Proceedings from the annual meeting of the chicago linguistic society, Chicago Linguistic Society, 2015, 51.

Elçi, A., & Devran, B.C. (2014). A narrative research approach: the experiences of social media support in higher education. In P. Zaphiris (Ed.), Human-computer interaction (part I, HCII) (pp. 36-42). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Goebel, Z. (2005). An ethnographic study of code choice in two neighborhoods of indonesia. Australian Jounal of Linguistics, 25(1), 85-107.

Grenoble, L.A. (2018). Why revitalize?. In Olko, J., & Sallabank, J (Eds.), Revitalizing endangered languages: A practical guide. Engaged Humanities Project.

Gumilar, T. (2015). Regional languages in indonesian educational system: a comparison study of javanese, sundanese and dayak languages teaching programs. Investigationes Linguisticae, 33(4), 29-42.

Haboud, M., Howard, R., Cru, J., & Freeland, J. (n.d.). The handbook of indigenous language and revitalization chapter 10 linguistic human rights and language revitalization latin america and the caribean.

Johari, M.H.Y.B., & Nazari, Z.A. (2019). Proficiencyof javanese language in developing identity among javanese youth. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1088-1098.

Law No. 24 / 2009 on the national flag, language, emblem, and anthem. [Online] Available: http://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id (December 7, 2019).

Nadar, F.X. (2007). The prominent characteristics of javanese culture and their reflections in language use. Humaniora, 19(2), 168-174.

Nakata, S.J.D. (2017). Language suppression, revitalization, and native hawaiian identity, 2, 14-27.

Nirmala, D. (2015). Javanese cultural words in local newspapers in central java as a language maintenance model. Humaniora, 27(3), 293-304.

Nurani, L.M. Changing language loyalty and identity: an ethnographic inquiry of societal transformation among the javanese people in yogyakarta, indonesia. Arizona State University: Dissertation. [Online]. Available: https://repository.asu.edu (August 15, 2015).

Saddhono, K., & Rohmadi, M. (2014). Sociolinguistics study on the use of javanese language in the learning process in primary schools in surakarta, central java, indonesia. International Education Studies, 7(6), 25-30.

Subiyantoro. (2014). Survival strategies of the javanese language in new caledonia. Humaniora, 26(1), 43-55.

The Canadian Bar Association.Bill C-91- indigenous languages act. [Online]. Available: www.cba.org (March, 2019).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.2p.16

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.