Language Learning Strategy Use and English Proficiency of Iraqi Upper Secondary School Students

Qusay Mahdi Mutar

Abstract


To learn English language, there are some language-learning strategies, which learners need to be familiar with. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the language learning strategies used among Iraqi sixth-grade preparatory students, and how could gender and proficiency level effect on using language-learning strategies. To analyze the collected data, SPSS software version 20 included Independent sample T-Test Besides, one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD have been used. A total of 210 sixth-grade preparatory students were chosen randomly from four-different secondary schools for the academic year 2016-2017 at al-Karkh side of Baghdad city. The study sample consisted of (105 females and 105 males). The findings revealed that EFL learners have shown medium use of language learning strategies, besides, no statistically significant differences between male and female students in the frequency of using LLSs. the findings also showed Cognitive and memory strategies were the most frequent used categories comparing to the compensation strategies that scored the least frequent category. As for language proficiency, the result showed that students with high proficiency used all six categories of learning strategies more than medium and low-proficiency students.


Keywords


English Proficiency, Gender, Language-learning Strategies, Sixth-Grade Preparatory Students, Strategy Inventory For Language Learning (SILL)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abid, R., & Daghir, S. & Ridha, N. (2010) Investigating the Relationship between Learner's Gender, Proficiency, and Language Learning Strategies: The Case of EFL Iraqi Learners. Adab Al-Basra journal, 53, 32-56

Abraham, R. G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.85-102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Erarslan, A., & Höl, D. (2014). A study on language learning strategies of Turkish EFL learners at a state university. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition–JSMULA, 2(2), 1-10.

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social functions of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NI: Prentice-Hall.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Florida.

Boroujeni, Roohani, and Sharifi. 2014. Language Learning Strategy. RALs. Vol.5 (1) 44-55

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of second language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Arnold.

Chamot, A. U., Küpper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1988). A study of learning strate- gies in foreign language instruction: Findings of the longitudinal study. McLean, VA: Interstate Research Associates.

Chamot, A.U. & EI-Dniary, P.B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-341.

Chen, I. J. (2002). Language learning strategies used by high and low English proficiency students in a technology college. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Dongyue, L. (2004), EFL Proficiency, Gender and Language Learning Strategy Use Among a Group of Chinese Technological Institute English Majors. Arecls E-Journal, 1 (A5).

Dadour, E.S. & Robbins, J., 1996: University-level studies using strategy instruction to improve speaking ability in Egypt and Japan. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 157-166). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.

Flanegin, M., and Rudd, B. (2000). Integration Communication Skills and Business Education. Journal of Business Education. Retrieved from http://www.abe.villanova.edu./proceed2000.html

Kato, S. (2009). The Relationship of Language Learning Strategies and Personality on English Proficiency in Japanese University Students. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 6(1), 141-162.

Green, J., & Oxford, R.L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.

Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationship between patterns of reported language learning strategy (LLS) use by speakers of other languages (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation (Doctoral dissertation, ResearchSpace@ Auckland).

Johansson, I. and Jonsson, B. (2006). Effects of Teaching in English at Swedish Universities. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2006 International Conference. Engagement and Empowerment: New Opportunities for Growth in Higher Education, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia, 22-24 November 2006. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ceducom/80 on 4thSeptember 2014 at 10am.

Kato, S. (2005). How language-learning strategies affect English proficiency in Japanese university students. Journal of the Faculty of Human Studies Bunkyo Gakuin University, 7(1), 239-262.

Kato, S. (2009). The Relationship of Language Learning Strategies and Personality on English Proficiency in Japanese University Students. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 6(1), 141-162.

Kotzé, H. (2012). The relationship between the language learning strategy use and language proficiency of Vietnamese-speaking learners of English as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).

Lan, R. & Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning strategy profile of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL. 41, 339-379.

Liao, P.-S. (2002). Taiwanese Students’ Beliefs about Translation and their Use of Translation as a Strategy to Learn English. (PhD thesis; Austin, USA: The University of Texas at Austin).

McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Arnold.

Nguyen, T. B. H. (2013). English learning strategies of Vietnamese tertiary students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania).

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessment the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.

Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 166-174.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good learner’ can teach us? TOESL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.

Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M., & Salahshour, N. (2013). The relationship between language learning strategy use language proficiency level and learner gender. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 634-643

Tam, K. C. H. (2013). A study on language learning strategies (LLSs) of university students in Hong Kong. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 11(2), 1-42.

Tarone, E. (1983). Some Thoughts on the Notion of Communication Strateg. In C. Farerch, and G. Kasper (eds). Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman, 61-74.

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387-409.

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in Interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 494-505.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yang, N. (1992). Second language learners’ beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies: A study of college students of English in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Yang, M. (2010). Language learning strategies of English as a foreign language university students in Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana State University.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.59

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.