The Comparative Impacts of Using Lexical Glossing and Inferencing Strategies on Students’ Reading Comprehension

- Juliana

Abstract


The study compared the use of the lexical glossing and inferencing strategies that impact toward the students’ reading comprehension. The objective of the study was to find out the effective strategy to use for enhancing the students’ reading comprehension. The population of the study was 40 Informatics Systems students of Potensi Utama University. The data collection was used written test by comparing the scores results after giving the treatment. The written test was conducted to identify students’ reading comprehension performance toward the use of lexical glossing and inferencing strategies. The data was analyzed applying an experimental research design. There were two tests in this study before and after treatment. Before treatment without using the strategies, the first test was applied to first group and second group. After treatment with using the strategies, the second test was applied to the first and second group. The first group was taught using lexical glossing strategy, while the second group was treated using lexical inferencing strategies. The test resulted that the students in the second group using lexical inferencing strategies could guess the unfamiliar word meaning correctly that impact toward the students’ reading comprehension. While the students in the first group using the lexical glossing strategy make erroneous guesses about unfamiliar word meaning that impact on the students’ reading comprehension. Therefore, it can be concluded that lexical inferencing strategy was recommended to teach to enhance the students’ reading comprehension.


Keywords


Glossing and Inferencing Strategies, Reading Comprehension

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnett, M. A. (1988). Teaching Reading Strategies: How Methodology Affects Language Course. Foreign Language Annals, 21, No.2, pp.109-119.

Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical Inferencing Procedures or Talking about words: Receptive Procedures in Foreign Language Learning with Special Reference to English. Tubingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.

Huckin, T. & J. Bloch.(1993). Strategies for inferring word meaning from context: A cognitive model: In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.); Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp.153-178). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hulstijn. (1992). Retention of Inferred and Given Word Meanings: Experiments in Incidental Vocabulary Learning. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics. Great Britain: MacMillan.

Lomicka, L.L. (1998). To Gloss or Not to Gloss: An Investigation of Reading Comprehension Online, Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 41-50. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/pdf/article2.pdf.

Nation. I.S.P (2001). Learning Vocabulary in another Language. United Kingdom:Victoria University of Wellington

Paribakht, T. S. & M. Wesche (1999). Reading and Incidental L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: An Introspective Study of Lexical Inferencing”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, pp. 195-224.

Schmitt, Norbert. (2010). Reseraching Vocabulary. United Kingdom: University of Nottingham

Van Blerkom, Malcolm. (2009). Measurement and Statistics for Teachers. London: University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.