The Effect of Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) Types on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Performance

Khadijeh Aghajanloo, Fariba Mobini, Robab Khosravi

Abstract


Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) is a controversial topic among theorists and researchers in L2 studies. Ellis, Sheen, Murakami, and Takashima (2008) identify two dominant dichotomies in this regard, that is focused vs. unfocused WCF and direct vs. indirect WCF. This study considered both dichotomies in a matrix format, resulted in the recognition of four types of operationally defined WCF, and aimed at: (1) investigating the effects of four types of WCF (i.e., focused direct CF, unfocused direct CF, focused indirect CF, and unfocused indirect CF) on intermediate EFL learners’ writing performance; (2) finding out the most effective type of WCF for intermediate EFL learners’ writing performance; (3) determining learners’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of using WCF and the types which they had received. After conducting Nelson English Language Test (Test 300 D), out of 140 male and female Iranian EFL learners, 120 of them were selected as intermediate learners, aging from 14-18. The subjects were then assigned randomly to four homogeneous groups (each group including 30 participants). The pre-test and post-test both included a writing test which assessed learners’ writing performance, and then their scores were analyzed by using analytic marking scale. The results indicated that, learners outperformed in all of the four groups, validating WCF as an effective technique which can be used in EFL classes. A clear implication of the study is that WCF types (specially unfocused direct CF) should be emphasized as an essential tool for developing writing ability of intermediate EFL learners.

Keywords: Written Corrective Feedback (WCF), Focused CF, Unfocused CF, Direct CF, Indirect CF, Writing Performance, Intermediate EFL Learners


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 409-431

Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U. (2009a). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37, 322-329.

Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U. (2009b). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204-2011.

Bitchener, J. and Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.

Brookhart, S. M. (2008). Ho to give effective feedback to your students. Association for supervision and curriculum development.

Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 136-140

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296

Ducken, D. (2014). Written Corrective Feedback in the L2 Writing Classroom. EUW Master’s Thesis Collection. Paper 221.

Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System 33(2), 209-224.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Morakami, M., and Takashima, H. (2008). The effect of focused and unfocused corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.

Ferris, D. R. (1995a). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors? CATESOL Journal, 8, 41-62.

Ferris, D. R. (1995b). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (And what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49-62

Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland and F. 226 Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, D. R & Hedgcock, J.S. (2004). Teaching ESL Composition. Purpose, Process, and Practice. Routledge. New York.

Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40-53

Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans N. W. (2012). The differential of comprehensive corrective feedback on L2 writing accuracy. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 3(2), 25-50.

Hosseini, M., Taghizadeh, M.E., Zainol Abedin, M. J., & Naseri, E. (2013). In the importance of EFL learners' writing skill: Is there any relation between writing skill and content score of English essay test? International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 6, 1-12

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching research, 4, 33-54.

Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 1-12

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching Research Journal, 39(2), 83-101

Kamberi, L. (2013). The significance of teacher feedback in EFL writing for tertiary level foreign language learners. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1686-1690

Keh, C. 1990. Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44, 94-304.

Khazaei, S. (2011). An Investigation into the Impact of Traditional vs. Blended Teaching on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Acquisition: M-learning in Focus. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 202-207

Kroll, B. (Ed.). (2003). Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: an experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.

Leki, I. (1991a). The preference of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annuals, 24, 203-228.

Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.

Mubarak, M. (2013). Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Study of Practicies and Effectiveness in the Bahrain Context. Published Doctoral thesis. University of Sheffield.

Nicol, D. J., & D. Macfarlane-Dick. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS Survival Manual. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Reid, J. (1998). Responding to ESL student language problems: Error analysis and revision plans. In P. Byrd & J. Reid (Eds.), Grammar in the composition classroom (pp. 118-137). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. (4th Ed). Pearson Education

Sadeghi, K. & Mosalli, Z. (2013). The effect of task complexity on the quality of EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 115-134

Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review 11, 11-26.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283

Sheen, Y. (2010a). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2), 169-179.

Sheen, Y. (2010b). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 201-234.

Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 1-27

Van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., and Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279-296.

Van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., and Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in Dutch multilingual classrooms. Language Learning, 61, 1-41.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.