Graduation Resources in Medical Case Reports Written by Native and Non-Native Medical Writers

Muna Abdulhussein Swear

Abstract


The Appraisal Theory includes three subsystems of evaluation; Attitude, Engagement, and Graduation. This study  focuses on Graduation subsystem which  is used by writers to amplify or diminish the scope of these two subsystems. It consists of Focus and Force options. Focus expressions are usually non-gradable they tend to sharpen or soften the utterances.  Force, on the other hand modulates gradable expressions; which can be emphasized or downtoned the writer's utterances in terms of Intensification and Quantification. This pilot test is conducted to characterize the Force: Graduation of the heteroglossic resources in 20 MCR written in English by NS and NNS (Malaysian) medical writers. MCR is a medical genre that has proven recently to be very important in the advancement of medical researches and in serving pedagogical purposes to offer a description to the practical strength of the clinical decision-making. Many incidents of Force: Graduation are collected for the purpose of analysis. The analysis includes investigating   the gradable heteroglossic resources in the MCRs of both groups of writers and examining the differences in employing these resources. The results indicate a little bit more frequent occurrence in the NS medical writers MCRs gradable heteroglossic expressions compared with those of NNS medical writers. Additionally, the use of these resources in the discussion sections of both groups is higher than in the other sections for both writers.

Keywords: graduation resources, appraisal theory, corpus-based research 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aitken, Leanne M. and Andrea P. Marshall (2007). Writing a case study: ensuring a meaningful contribution to the literature. Australian Critical Care, 20, 132-136.

Biook B,(2012) . A Comparative Genre Analysis of Hedging Expressions in Research Articles: Is Fuzziness Forever Wicked? The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(2), 119 – 128.

Chang, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,10(3),140-151

Isaac, C. (2012). Stance and Reader Positioning in Upper-Level Student Writing in Political Theory and Economics. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, The University of Michigan

Lee, S. H. (2006). The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. Unpublished doctorial dissertation,University of Sydney, Sydney.

Martin,& White, (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.

Chatterjee,M.(2011) . Identity and textual engagement : experiences of three international students writing a doctoral thesis in EAL. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Wollongong.

Nakamura,A.(2009). Construction of evaluative meanings in the IELTS writing: an intersubjective and intertextual perspective. Unpublished doctorial dissertation: University of Wollonong.

Salager-Meyer,F. (2001). From Self-Highlightedness to Self-Effacement:A Genre-Based Study of the Socio-Pragmatic Function of Criticism in Medical Discourse. LSP& Professional Communication, 1 (2): 63-84

White, P.R.R. (2001). Introductory Guide to Appraisal. www.grammatics.com/appraisal (accessed 21-12-2012).

Vandenbroucke, J.P. (1999). Case Reports in an Evidence-based World. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 92(4):159-163.

Vian Jr., Orlando (2008). Appraisal System in Brazilian Portuguese: Resources for Graduation. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication, 29,808-824.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.