Ground Reaction Forces in Alternative Footwear during Slip Events

Harish Chander, John C. Garner, Chip Wade

Abstract


Slips, trips and falls are major causitive factors for occupational and non-occupational falls. Alternative footwear such has crocs and flip flops have been used in and around work places and communities that can be slip prone environments. The purpose of the study is to analyze the effects of alternative footwear [crocs (CC), flip-flops (FF)] and industry standard slip resistant shoes (LT) on ground reaction forces (GRFs) during slip events. Eighteen healthy male participants following a repeated measures design for each footwear condition, were tested for heel kinematics during normal dry surface gait (NG); unexpected slip (US), alert slip (AS) and expected slip (ES). A 3x4 repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dependent vertical GRFs parameters (Mean Z-GRF and Peak Z-GRF) at p = 0.05. Significant interactions between footwear and gait trials were found for Mean Z-GRF and significant main effect in gait trials for Peak Z-GRF were evident. On average significantly lower GRFs were seen in slip trials compared to normal gait. FF exhibited significantly lower GRFs during slip trials while LT demonstrated lower GRFs in normal gait. The reduced ground reaction forces during all slip events compared to normal gait can be attributed to the incomplete weight transfer on the slipping foot during the unexpected and alert slips and to the anticipation of the slippery environment in expected slips. Flip flops which had greater incidence of slips also demonstrated reduced GRFs compared to CC and LT during slip events, further suggesting incomplete weight transfer, while during normal gait, LT demonstrated reduced GRFs compared to alternative footwear owing to its cushioning midsole properties. The LT with lowest incidence of slips demonstrates to be the choice of footwear for maneuvering slippery flooring conditions and for reducing impact reaction forces during non-slippery flooring conditions.

Keywords: Slips, Falls, Alternative Footwear, Ground Reaction Forces, Perception of Slipperiness


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bohm, H, &Hosl, M. (2010). Effect of boot shaft stiffness on stability joint energy and muscular co-contraction during walking on uneven surface. Journal of Biomechanics, 43, 2467–2472.

Chander, H., Garner, J. C., & Wade, C. (2014). Impact on balance while walking in occupational footwear. Footwear Science, 6(1), 59-66.

Cham, R., Redfern, M.S., (2002a). Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors. Gait & Posture 15, 159–171.

Cham, R., Redfern, M.S., (2002b). Heel contact dynamics during slip events on level and inclined surfaces. Safety Science. 40, 559–576.

Cohen, H.H., Cohen, D.M., (1994). Perceptions of walking surface slipperiness under realistic conditions, utilizing a slipperiness rating scale. Journal of Safety Research. 25(1), 27–31.

Courtney, T. K., Sorock, G. S., Manning, D. P., Collins, J. W. and Holbein-Jenny, M. A. (2001). Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated? Ergonomics, 44, 1118- 1137.

Davis, P. R. (1983). Human factors contributing to slips, trips and falls. Ergonomics, 26(1), 51-59.

De Wit, B., De Clercq, D., & Aerts, P. (2000). Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. Journal of Biomechanics, 33(3), 269-278.

DiDomenico, A., McGorry, R. W., & Chang, C. C. (2007). Association of subjective ratings of slipperiness to heel displacement following contact with the floor. Applied Ergonomics, 38(5), 533-539

Divert, C., Mornieux, G., Baur, H., Mayer, H., Belli, A. (2005). Mechanical Comparison of Barefoot and Shod Running. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 26, 593 – 598.

Gauchard, G., Chau, N., Mur, J. M., & Perrin, P. (2001). Falls and working individuals: role of extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Ergonomics, 44(14), 1330-1339.

Hanson, J. P., Redfern, M. S., &Mazumdar, M. (1999). Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. Ergonomics, 42(12), 1619-1633.

Li, K. W., & Chen, C. J. (2005). Effects of tread groove orientation and width of the footwear pads on measured friction coefficients. Safety Science, 43(7), 391-405.

Li, K. W., Wu, H. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2006). The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants. Applied Ergonomics, 37(6), 743-748.

Lin D, Seol H, Nussbaum M, Madigan M (2008). Reliability of COP- based postural sway measures and age-related differences. Gait & Posture, 28, 337-342

Lockhart, T. E., Spaulding, J. M., & Park, S. H. (2007). Age-related slip avoidance strategy while walking over a known slippery floor surface. Gait & Posture, 26(1), 142-149.

McGorry, R. W., DiDomenico, A., & Chang, C. C. (2010). The anatomy of a slip: Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of slip and non-slip matched trials. Applied Ergonomics, 41(1), 41-46.

Menant, J, Perry, S, Steele, J, Menz, H,Munro, B, Lord, S (2008). Effects of Shoe Characteristics on Dynamic Stability When Walking on Even and Uneven Surfaces in Young and Older People. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 89, 1970-6.

Moyer, B. E., Chambers, A. J., Redfern, M. S., & Cham, R. (2006). Gait parameters as predictors of slip severity in younger and older adults. Ergonomics, 49(4), 329-343.

Perkins, P. J. 1978, Measurement of slip between the shoe and ground during walking, in Walkway Surfaces: Measurement of Slip Resistance, ASTM STP 649, Philadelphia, PA.

Perry S, Radtke A, Goodwin C (2007). Influence of footwear midsole material hardness on dynamic balance control during unexpected gait termination. Gait & Posture 25, 94-98.

Redfern, M. S., Cham, R., Gielo-Perczak, K., Grönqvist, R., Hirvonen, M., Lanshammar, H.,& Powers, C. (2001). Biomechanics of slips. Ergonomics, 44(13), 1138-1166.

Redfern, M.S., &DiPasquale, J. (1997). Biomechanics of descending ramps. Gait & Posture, 6(2), 119-125.

Shakoor, N., Sengupta, M., Foucher, K. C., Wimmer, M. A., Fogg, L. F., & Block, J. A. (2010). Effects of common footwear on joint loading in osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Care & Research, 62(7), 917-923.

Shroyer, J. F., & Weimar, W. H. (2010). Comparative analysis of human gait while wearing thong-style flip-flops versus sneakers. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 100(4), 251-257.

Strandberg, L. and Lanshammar, H. (1981). The dynamics of slipping accidents, Journal of Occupational Accidents, 3, 153-162.

Yan, A. F., Sinclair, P. J., Hiller, C., Wegener, C., & Smith, R. M. (2013). Impact attenuation during weight bearing activities in barefoot vs. shod conditions: a systematic review. Gait & Posture, 38(2), 175-186.

Zhang X, Paquette MR & Zhang S: A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes. (2013). Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 45(6).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.