Ethnocentrism, Theoretical Awareness, and Intellectual Resistance in University Students’ Reading Behaviour

Brahim Hiba

Abstract


This paper discusses the insightful and illuminating findings of teaching critical reading within the theoretical framework of critical pedagogy. More specifically, this paper examines the impact of a critical-reading course on students’ reading skills and beliefs about discourse production and interpretation. The course was conducted according to the principles of transformative participatory action research and, thus, a corpus of 50 essays, written by a convenience sample of 25 post-graduate students in the pre-test and post-test phases, was analyzed to examine the effect of the course on students’ reading-habits and their representations of different discourses. Pretest findings showed that most students used to think that discourses are innocent and ideology-free and that reading a text consists in understanding its general idea, extracting its writer’s viewpoint, making sense of its vocabulary, and paraphrasing it. As far as text’s function is concerned, most students used to believe that a text’s basic function is delivering information. In addition, most of them were unaware of the fact that a text has ideological and socio-political functions. Post-test findings revealed that students’ discourse awareness and reading habits have become more critical and developed at two levels: the worldview level and the meta-language level. The t-test statistics suggest that there is a significant difference of p˂.001 between students’ reading scores before and after the intervention. Therefore, the null hypothesis which says that there is no significant difference between studying critical reading from a critical pedagogy perspective and studying it from a functional or conventional perspective is false.

Keywords


Critical Pedagogy, Critical Reading, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Awareness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, P., & Ellece, S. (2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Barry, P. (2002). Beginning Theory. Manchester University Press.

Boghossian, P. (2006). Socratic pedagogy, critical thinking, and inmate Education. Journal of Correctional Education, 57(1), 42-63.

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics The Basics. Routledge.

Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.

Correia, R. (2006). Encouraging critical reading in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 44(1), 16-27.

Cots, J.M. (2006). Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60(4), 336–345.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research. Pearson Education.

Dar, K.Z., Rahimi, A., & Shams, M.R. (2010). Teaching reading with a critical attitude: Using critical discourse analysis to Raise EFL university students’ critical language awareness. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 3(2), 457-476.

Dobie, A. B. (2011). Theory into Practice: An Introduction into Literary Criticism. Cengage Learning.

Ebrahimi, N., & Rahimi, A. (2013). Towards a more efficient EFL reading comprehension classroom environment: The role of content and critical reading. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7, 1–15.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.

Foucault, M. (1979). Truth and power, an interview with Fontano and Pasquino. In M. Morris, & P. Patton (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Power/Truth/Strategy (pp. 29–48). Feral Publications.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum Publishing.

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum Publishing.

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2005). Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Giroux, H. (2010). Lessons From Paulo Freire. Retrieved on April 13th, 2014 from http://chronicle.com/article/Lessons From-Paulo-Freire/124910/

Harste, J. C. (2003). What do we mean by literacy now? Voices from the Middle, 10(3), 8-12.

Hazaea, A. (2020). Fostering critical intercultural awareness among EFL students through critical discourse analysis. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(1), 17-33. doi: 10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n01a06

Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1997). Changing Multiculturalism. Temple University Press.

Ko, M.Y. (2013). A case study of an EFL teacher’s critical literacy teaching in a reading class in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 91- 108.

Lewison, M., Flint, A., & van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382-392.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage.

Matin, M. F. (2017). The implementation of critical discourse analysis in an English classroom. Indonesian EFL Journal, 3(1), 11-20.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.

Monckton, L. (2014). The Quran Is Illegal. Retrieved on October 1st, 2014 from http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/the-quran-is-illegal/

Ponzio, A. (1993). Signs, Dialogue, and Ideology. John Benjamins.

Shor, I. (1992). Empowering Education. Chicago University Press.

Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA, a plea for diversity. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp.95-120). Sage Publications.

Van Eemeren, F. H. (2001). Fallacies. In F. H. Van Eemeren, (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp.135-64). Amsterdam University Press.

Wallace, C. (1992). Critical literacy awareness in the EFL classroom. In N. Fairclough (Eds.), Critical Language Awareness (pp. 59-92). Longman.

Wallace, C. (2003). Critical Reading in Language Education. Palgrave MacMillan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.4p.228

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.