Innovation, Recreation, Interpretation? A Case Study on the Origins and Implementation of Transversal Core Competencies in Finnish Basic Education Core Curriculum Reform 2016

Jyrki Loima


This qualitative study on the Finnish basic education curriculum (2016) had two goals. First, to survey the origins of first two new curriculum competences: 1) thinking and learning to learn, and, 2) cultural competences. Second, to analyse the local curricular implementation and comprehension in a rapid socio-cultural change. To reveal the possible data trends, two research questions were addressed: 1. What was the background of first two 2016 transversal core competencies? 2. How were those competencies implemented into a local curriculum 2016-19? The Data included basic education curricula (1985-2016), and a local curriculum. Relevant legislation, official information (e.g. PISA), parental feedback, and a questionnaire to an anonymous implementing principal comprised the curricular data. The Data triangulation was completed with a wide range of educational, cultural and ideological research. Regarding ethics, the individual sources and educational provider remained anonymous. Findings were surprising. “Modern” thinking and learning skills were created in early 20th century American society by Deweyan comprehension. However, an immigration had changed the long-lasting interpretation on the origins of Finnish culture. Moreover, local curriculum implementation was more successfully comprehended and supported. Conclusions were obvious: more identifiable research and teachers’ training were needed for curricular reforms and competences. The socio-cultural comprehension in the era of AI asked for sound arguments.


Curriculum, Core Competences, Thinking and Learning, Culture, Comprehension and Interpretation

Full Text:



Alapuro, R. (1995). Suomen synty paikallisena ilmiönä 1890-1933. [The birth of Finland as a local phenomenon 1890-1933]. Helsinki, Finland: Hanki ja jää.

Alderman, K. M. (2008). Motivation for achievement (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Albrecht, J. R., & Kavabenick, S.A. (2019). Relevant education in a changing world: Expanding value for the motivation sciences. In E. N. Gonida, & M. S. Lemos (Eds.) Motivation in education at a time of global change: A Theory, research, and implications for practice, volume 20 (pp. 33-52). Bingley, UK: CPI Group.

Atjonen, P., Laivamaa, H., Levonen, A., Orell, S., Saari, M., Sulonen, K., Tamm, M., Kamppi, P., Rumpu, N., Hietala, R., & Immonen, J. (2019) “että tietää, missä on menossa”. Oppimisen ja osaamisen arviointi perusopetuksessa ja lukiokoulutuksessa, 37-41, 65-83, 100-142, 200-225, 233-240. KARVI 7: 2019. [“So that we know where we stand” Assessment of learning and competence in basic education and general upper secondary education]. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC) 7: 2019 (abstract in English). Retrieved from

Basic Education Act (1998). Retrieved from

Borman, G. D., Grigg, J., & Hanselman, P. (2016). An effort to close achievement gaps at scale through self-affirmation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 21–42.

Burton, K.D., Lydon, J. E., D'Alessandro, D.U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750-62.

Butler, R. (2019). Gender, Motivation and Society: New and continuing challenges. In E. N. Gonida, & M. S. Lemos. (Eds.). Motivation in education at a time of global change: Theory, research, and implications for practice, volume 20, (pp. 129-141). Bingley, UK: CPI Group.

Chaban, N. & Elgstom, O. (2014). The role of the EU in an emerging new world order in the eyes of the Chinese, Indian and Russian Press. Journal of European Integration, Volume 36, 170-188.

Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 618-635.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). New policies for 21st century demands. In J. Bellanca, & R. Brandt. (Eds.). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 33-49). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.

Darling-Hammond, L., Banks, J., Zumwalt, K., Gomez, L., Sherin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L. (2005). Educational goals and purposes: Developing a curricular vision for teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.). Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 169-200). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. New York, NY: Routledge.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st-century skills. In J. Bellanca, & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st Century Skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51-75). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: McMillan.

European Commission. (2016). The EU and the refugee crisis. DOI:10.2775/1491

European Council. (n.d.). EU trade policy. Retrieved from

EURYDICE (2017). Finland overview. Retrieved from

Finnish Immigration Services. (2017). Vastaanottojärjestelmän raportti 1.1.2016-40.4.2017. [Reception Center Annual Report 1.1.2016-30.4.2017]. Retrieved 3 December 2019, from

Finnish National Agency of Education. (2004). Basic education curriculum 2004. Retrieved 10 September 2019, from

Finnish National Agency of Education. (2014). Opetussuunnitelman perusteet. [Basic Education Core curriculum] Retrieved 10 September, from

Finnish National Agency of Education. (2016). Basic Education Curriculum 2014. Helsinki.

Finnish National Agency of Education. (n.d.). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman ydinasiat. [Core elements of Curriculum]. Retrieved 8 December 2019, from

Finnish National Agency of Education. (2019a). Opetussuunnitelmauudistuksen toimeenpanoon lisää tukea. [More support to curriculum implementation]. Retrieved 8 December 2019, from

Finnish National Agency of Education. (2019b). Perusopetuksen arvioinnin periaatteet uudistuvat – luonnos avattu kommentoitavaksi. [Assessment criteria reform, an open draft for comments]. Retrieved 9 December, 2019 from

Finnish National Board of Education. Memorandum and presentations (Ms. Halinen and Mr. Kauppinen) of the curriculum start-up Seminar, autumn 2011 (in private archives).

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic books.

Gardner, H. (2000). The disciplined mind: Beyond facts and standardized tests, the K-12 education that every child deserves. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

Gayle, V., & Lambert, P. (2018). What is quantitative longitudinal data analysis? New York, NY: Bloomington.

Goble, E., & Yin, Y. (2014). Introduction to hermeneutical phenomenology: A research methodology best learned by doing it. Retrieved from

Gordon, D. (2006). The concept of the hidden curriculum. Journal of Philosophy of Education,16, 187-198.

Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.

Grolnick, W. S., Kurowski, C. O., & Gurland, S. T. (1999). Family processes and the development of children’s self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 3–14. Retrieved from

Hecht, C., A., Prininski, S., J. & Harackiewicz, J., M. (Understanding long-term effects of motivation interventions in a changing world. In E. N. Gonida, & M. S. Lemos (Eds.) Motivation in education at a time of global change: A Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 83-92). Bingley, UK: CPI Group.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Heidegger, M. (1993). What calls for thinking. In M. Heidegger. Basic writings (pp. 370-391). London, UK: Routledge.

Heiskanen, I. (1983). Yhteiskuntatieteet, käytännön yhteiskuntateoria ja maamme älyllinen ilmasto[Social sciences, practical theory of society, and intellectual atmosphere of our country] In I. Heiskanen (ed.). Valtio ja yhteiskunta. Tutkielmia suomalaisen valtiollisen ajattelun ja valtiopin historiasta. (pp. 7-11). Juva.

Helsingin Sanomat (2017-2019), Editorial articles and Readers’ views. Retrieved December 12, 2019 from

Hobsbawm, E. (1992). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth and Reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hobsbawm, E. & Ranger, T. (1989). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Holm, G. & Zilliacus, H. (2009) Multicultural education and intercultural education: Is there a difference? In M. Talib, J. Loima, H. Paavola, & S. Patrikainen. (Eds.) Dialogs on Diversity and Global Education (pp. 11-28). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

Johnston, J. S. (2019). Problems in philosophy of education: A systemic approach. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

Kaplan, A., Garner, J. K., & Brock, B. (2019). Identity and motivation in a changing world. A complex dynamic systems perspective. In E. N. Gonida, & M. S. Lemos (Eds.) Motivation in education at a time of global change: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice (pp. 101-122). Bingley, UK: CPI Group.

Kim, J. I., Schallert, D. L., & Kim, M. (2010). An integrative cultural view of achievement motivation: Parental and classroom predictors of children's goal orientations when learning mathematics in Korea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 418-437.

Kirjavainen, T. & Pulkkinen, J. (2017). Takaako samanlainen tausta samanlaisen osaamisen? Maahanmuuttajataustaisten ja kantaväestön oppilaiden osaamiserot PISA 2012-tutkimuksessa [Does similar background guarantee similar competencies? Competence differences between students of immigrant and native origins in PISA 2012] in Kasvatus, 3, 189-202.

Kirmayer, L. J. (2019). The politics of diversity: Pluralism, multiculturalism and mental health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 56(6), 1119-1138.

Kolbe, L. (Ed.) (2003). Suomen kulttuurihistoria 3. Oma maa ja maailma. [Cultural History of Finland, 3. Our country and globe]. Helsinki, Finland: Tammi.

Kortekangas, O., Paksuniemi, M. & Ervast, H. (2019). Milestones of basic education in Finland. In M. Paksuniemi & P. Keskitalo (eds.). Introduction to the Finnish educational system (pp.8-11) Leiden, The Netherlands: Printforce.

Kyrö, P. (2008). A theoretical framework for teaching and learning. In J. Loima (ed.). Facing the future: Developing teacher education (pp.148-174). Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press, Hakapaino.

Kärkkö, M. (2019): Immigrant Students in the Finnish Educational System. In M. Paksuniemi & P. Keskitalo (Eds.) Introduction to the Finnish Educational System (pp. 81-86). Leiden, the Netherlands: Printforce.

Lamb, S, Maire, Q., & Doecke, E. (2017). Key skills for the 21st century: An evidence-based review. Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University.

Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Lim, T., K. (2006). Gifted students in a community of inquiry. Journal of Educational Policy, Vol. 3, 67-80.

Loima, J. (2006). Myytit, uskomukset ja kansa. Johdatus moderniin nationalismiin Suomessa 1809-1918. [Myths, beliefs and people. Introduction to modern nationalism in Finland 1809-1918]. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press.

Loima, J. (2008). Curricula and entrepreneurship: Possibilities, obstacles and alternatives. In J. Loima (ed.). Facing the future: Developing teacher education (pp. 178-186). Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press, Hakapaino.

Loima, J. (2019). Encouraging enough? A case study on parental feedback on new assessment in Finnish basic education. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(2), 189-196. doi:

Loima, J., & Vibulphol, J. (2014). Internal interest of external performing? A Qualitative study on motivation and learning of 9th graders in Thailand basic education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 194-203.

Loima, J., & Vibulphol, J. (2016). Learning and motivation in Thailand: A comparative regional study on basic education ninth graders. International Education Studies, 9(1), 31-37.

Mahon, J. (2006). Under the invisibility cloak? Teacher understanding of cultural difference. Intercultural Education, 17(4), 391-405.

Miller, J. (1996). The holistic curriculum. Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.

Ministry of Finance of Finland (2016). Budget 2016 proposal. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from )

Moe, E., Härmälä, M., Kristmanson, P., Pascoal, J., & Ramonié, M. (2015). Language skills for successful subject learning. CEFR-linked descriptors for mathematics and history/civics. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved from:

Nieto, S. & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity. The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (Fifth edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Nind, M., Curtin, A., & Hall, K. (2016). Research methods for pedagogy. Bloomsbury, Southampton: Bloomsbury research methods for education.

Niemi, H., Lavonen, J., Kalliomäki, A., & Toom, A. (2018). The role of teachers in the Finnish educational system. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen. (Eds) The teachers’ role in the changing globalizing world: Resources and challenges related to the professional work of teaching (pp. 48-55). Leiden, the Netherlands: Printforce.

Niemi, H., & Lavonen, J. (2012). Evaluation for improvements in Finnish teacher education. In J. Harford, B. Hudson, & H. Niemi. (Eds.), Quality assurance and teacher education (pp. 159-185). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144.

Opetushallitus (1985). Opetussuunnitelman perusteet 1985 [Finnish National Board of Education. Basic education (core) curriculum]. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus.

Opetushallitus. (1994). Opetussuunnitelman perusteet 1995. [Finnish National Board of education (FNBE). Basic education (core) curriculum 1994]. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus.

Opetushallitus (2004). Opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2004. [Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). Basic education (core) curriculum 2004]. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus.

Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 46 (2), 47-165.

Pearlman, B. (2010). Designing new learning environments to support 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (eds.) 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 118-127). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Peim, N. (2018). Thinking in educational research. Applying philosophy and theory. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

PISA, Programme of International Student Assessment surveys (Data from 2000-18), OECD. Retrieved December 11, 2019, from

Pirinen, T. (Ed.) (2015). Maahanmuuttajataustaiset oppijat suomalaisessa koulutusjärjestelmässä. [Immigrant learners in Finnish education system]. Helsinki: Kansallisen koulutuksen arviointikeskus (FINEEC). Retrieved 3 January 2020, from

Puukko, M., Vuori, H., & Kuukka, K. (2019). Tiellä parempaan. Maahanmuuttajien koulutukseen integroitumisen hyviä käytäntöjä, 13-39. KARVI, (FINEEC). Retrieved 13 December 2019, from

Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change 15(3), 303-325.

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 183-207.

Rokka, P. (2011). Peruskoulun ja perusopetuksen vuosien 1985, 1994 ja 2004 opetussuunnitelmien perusteet poliittisen opetussuunnitelman teksteinä. [Basic education core curricula 1985, 1994 and 2004 as political curricula constructions]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tampere, Finland.

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish Lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? (Second Edition). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Sloan, A. & Bowe, Brian (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The philosophy, the methodologies and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers' experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1291-1303.

Smith, A. (1991). National identity. London, UK: Penguin books.

Tucker, M. S. (2019). Leading high-performance school systems: Lessons from the world’s best. Alexandria, VA. ASCD.

Um, A. E. K. (2005). Motivation and mathematics performance: A structural equation analysis (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation) Columbia University, US.

Van Manen, M. (2006). Writing qualitatively, or the demands of writing: Qualitative Health Research, 16(5), 713-722.

Van Manen, M. (2011) Phenomenologyonline. Retrieved 3 October, 2019, from

Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Kavabenick (Eds.). The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16A) (pp. 105–166). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Vibulphol, J., Loima, J., Areesophonpichet, S., & Rukspollmuang, C. (2015). Ready contents or future skills? A comparative study of teacher education curricula in Thailand and Finland. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 149-152.

Virta, A. (2009). Cultural diversity challenging history education: Why and how. In M. Talib, J. Loima, H. Paavola, & S. Patrikainen. (Eds.). Dialogs on diversity and global education (pp. 147-160). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

Vitikka, E., Krokfors, L., Hurmerinta, E. (2012). The Finnish national core curriculum: structure and development. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds). Miracle of education:The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 83-95). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Williams, M. K. (2017). John Dewey in the 21st Century. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 9 (1), 92-100. Retrieved from

Wing on Lee, J. & Tan, P. L. (2018). The new roles for twenty-first century teachers: Facilitator, knowledge broker, and pedagogical weaver. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi & J. Lavonen (Eds.) The Teachers’ Role in the Changing Globalizing World. Resources and Challenges Related to the Professional Work of Teaching (pp. 11-32). Leiden, the Netherlands: Printforce.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.