An Investigation of Syntactic Errors in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Learners’ Compositions: A Cohort Study

Meihua Liu, Ying Xu


This paper reports on a study of syntactic errors in English essays composed by Chinese university students. Thirty undergraduate non-English majors across disciplines produced 90 essays on three tasks during eight weeks, and answered a self-developed questionnaire at the end of the course. Analyses of the data resulted in the following main findings: (1) Among the ten types of syntactic errors, errors in tense and voice were the most frequently occurring type of errors,  (2) the errors generally tended to decrease across tasks, (3) the syntactic errors of various categories were generally inversely correlated with the students’ writing performance, and (4) the errors were caused by diverse reasons, of which carelessness and the differences between Chinese and English were considered the most crucial.



Syntactic error; writing performance

Full Text:



Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17-34.

Cai, J. (2001). A comparative study of English writing. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

Chan, A. Y. W. (2004). Syntactic Transfer: Evidence from the Interlanguage of Hong Kong Chinese ESL Learners. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 56-74.

Cheng, J. (1994). On the teaching of English writing. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 98, 12-18

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-169.

Crompton, P. (2005). “Where”, “In which”, and “in that”: a corpus-based approach to error analysis. RELC Journal, 36, 157-176.

Crusan, D. (2002). An assessment of ESL writing placement assessment. Assessing Writing, 8, 17-30.

Dam, P. (2001). Old habits die hard: persistent errors in English written by Vietnamese speakers [Online]. Available: (March 10, 2011).

Du, Y. (2004). An investigation of the errors in spoken English produced by university freshmen. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 103, 94-97.

Feng, C., Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2000). Mark-up-based writing error analysis model in an on-line classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 79-97.

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: how explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.

Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. Modern Language Journal, 79, 329-344.

French, G. (2005). The cline of errors in the writing of Japanese university students. World Englishes, 24, 371-382.

He, S. (2002). A comparative study of English and Chinese languages. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. Applied Language Learning, 12, 111-132.

Hsin, A. C. (2003). Indefinite subject NPs between English and Chinese: an error analysis [Online]. Available: (March 15, 2011).

Huang, L. S. (2001). Knowledge of English collocations: an analysis of Taiwanese EFL learners. Texas papers in Foreign Language Education: Selected Proceedings from the Texas Foreign language education Conference, 6, 256-264.

Hyland, K., & Anan, E. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of error: The effects of first language and experience. System, 34, 509-519

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use. Addison Wesley: Longman Inc.

Khuwaileh, A. A., & Shoumali, A. A. (2000). Writing errors: a study of the writing ability of Arab learners of academic English and Arabic at university. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 13, 174-183.

Kim, S. A. (2001). Characteristics of EFL readers’ summary writing: A study with Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 569-581.

Kramer, M. G., Leggett, G., & Mead, D. (1995). Prentice Hall Handbook for Writers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Li, R. (1996). A comparative study of English and Chinese languages and cultures. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.

Lian, S. (1993). A comparative study of English and Chinese. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2006). A study on the misuse of words among Chinese EFL learners. Foreign Language World, 8, 301-304.

Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623-636.

Liu, M., & Chai, Y. (2009). Attitudes towards peer review and reaction to peer feedback in Chinese EFL writing classrooms. TESL Reporter, 40, 33-50.

National Educational Examinations Authority and National College English Test Committee [Online]. (2009). Available: (Dec. 21, 2012).

Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47, 101-143

Su, H. (2002). Error analysis of the transitional verbs produced by Chinese EFL learners. Foreign Language Teaching, 23, 36-41.

Tang, L. (2000). Error analysis on the written expressions produced by Chinese EFL Learners. Foreign Languages and their Teaching, 12, 56-61.

Taylor, G. (1986). Errors and explanations. Applied Linguistics, 7, 144-166.

Wang, D. (2003). The impact of English and Chinese thinking styles on their languages. Foreign Languages and their Teaching, 3, 33-40.

Wang, J. (2005). From ideas to text: A cognitive study of English writing processes. Jinan: Shandong University Press.

Zhang, W. (2004). The rhetorical patterns found in Chinese EFL student writers’ examination essays in English and the influence of these patterns on rater response. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Zhang, Z., Wu, H., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (1995). Main problems about the teaching of English writing in China. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 104, 43-50.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.