Second Language Acquisition at the Phonetic-Phonological Interface: A proposal

Ashima Aggarwal

Abstract


This paper examines the acquisition of novel second language phonological contrasts by speakers of different languages. It explores the possibility of building a framework to test the adult acquisition of voicing and aspiration features of Hindi by speakers of Dimasa, Rabha, Tamil and English. It is noteworthy that Hindi has a four-way voicing contrast while Dimasa, Rabha and Tamil have two-way, three-way and one-way respectively. The paper presents an experiment designed to test the acquisition of non-native acquisition by these L1 speakers. The task designed to train these L1 speakers to perceive the new contrasts is an AX same or different task. Training will be followed by retention and generalizability test also. Evidence of significantly better perception post-training will suggest access to Universal Grammar beyond the Critical period.

 


Keywords


Second language acquisition, Critical period, voicing contrast, Universal Grammar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archangeli, D. (1999). Introducing Optimality Theory. Annual Review of Anthropology 28, 531-552.

Archibald, J. (1993a). Language learnability and L2 phonology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience. Issues in cross language research ,171-204. Timonium, MD: York Press.

Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706–755.

Birdsong, D. (1997). Intransitivity and SE in French: Aspects of late L2 learnability. Paper presented at the 22nd Boston University Child Language Development Conference.

Bley-Vroman, R. 1989. “The Logical Problem of Foreign Language Learning”. In S. Gass and J. Schachter (eds.) Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41-68.

Boersma, P. (1998). Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between

articulatory and perceptual drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

Boersma, P. and Escudero, P. (2003): Modelling the perceptual development of phonological contrasts with Optimality Theory and the Gradual Learning Algorithm. In Arunachalam, Sudha, Elsi Kaiser and Alexander Williams (eds.) Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 8.1: Proceedings of the 25th Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 71-85.

Boersma, P., & Hayes, B. (1999). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam and UCLA.

Boersma, P., & Hayes, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45-86.

Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 133-159). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bongaerts, T., Planken, B. & Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 30-50). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., &, Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447-465.

Broselow, E., & Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35–59.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Curtin, Suzanne (2001). Children’s Early Representations: Evidence from Production and Perception. Proceedings of the Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Conference (HILP 5), Potsdam, Germany.

Elliott, A. (1995). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 79, 356–371.

Fathman, A. (1975). The relationship between age and second language productive ability. Language Learning, 25, 245–253.

Flege, J. (1987a). A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 8, 162–177.

Flege, J. (1987b). Effects of equivalence classification on the production of foreign language speech sounds. In A. James & J. Leather (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 9–40). Dordrecht: Foris.

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233-277). Baltimore: York Press.

Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67-83.

Flege, J., & Munro, M. (1994). The word unit in second language speech perception and production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 381–411.

Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131-149.

Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2008). Second language phonology in Optimality Theory. In J.G.Hansen & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 117-146). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Ioup, G. (1989). Immigrant children who have failed to acquire native English. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition, Vol. II: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 160–175). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Klein, W. (1995). Language acquisition at different ages. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), The lifespan development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological and psychosocial perspectives. A synthesis (pp. 244-264). New york: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M. H. 2005. Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43(4), 287-317.

Long, M. H. 1990. Maturational constraints on language development. StudiesinSecondLanguageAcquisition 12(3), 251–285.

Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. Wiley.

Major, R. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

McCarthy, John. (1993). A case of surface constraint violation. In Carole Paradis et al., (Eds.), Constraint-based theories in multilinear phonology, a special issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics.

Neufeld, G. (1978). On the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features in adult language learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 163-174.

Newport, E.L. (2002). Critical periods in language development. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd./Nature Publishing Group.

Novoa, L., Fein, D. and Obler, L. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In L. Obler & D.Fein (Eds.), The exceptional brain. Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 294-302). New York: Guilford Press.

Oyama, S. (1976). "A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system". Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5. 261–285.

Pater, J. (1993). Theory and methodology in the study of metrical parameter (re) setting. In J. Matthews & L. White (Eds.), McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 211−243.

Prince, A. and Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report 2, Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rothman, J. (2008). Why not all counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis in Second Language Acquisition is not Equal or Problemantic. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(6). 1063–1088.

Rothman, J. and Guijarro-Furntes. (2010). Input Quality Matters: Some Comments on Input Type and Age-Effects in Adult SLA.Applied Linguistics 31, (2). pp. 301-306.

Schneiderman and Desmarais (1988). The talented language learner. Some preliminary findings. Second language research 4, 91-109.

Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R. A. (1994) Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In: Hoekstra T and Schwartz BD (eds) Language acquisition studies in generative grammar: Papers in honor of Kenneth Wexler from the 1991 GLOW workshops. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 317–68.

Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12, 40-72.

Scovel, T. (1981). The effects of neurological age on nonprimary language acquisition. In R. Andersen (Ed.), New dimensions in second language acquisition research (pp. 33–42). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Scovel, T. (1988). A Time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.

Singleton, D. (2005) The Critical Period Hypothesis: a coat of many colors. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL) 43, 269-285.

Singleton, D. and Lengyel, Z. (1995). The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Tesar, B. and Smolensky, P. (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition from initial to final state. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 130-155). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

White, L. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

White, L., & Genessee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233−265.

Wiltshire, C. (2005). The “Indian English” of Tibeto-Burman language speakers. English World-Wide, 26 (3), pp. 275-300.

Wode, H. (1989). Maturational changes of language acquisitional abilities. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition, Vol. II: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 176–188). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Wode, H. (1992). Categorical perception and segmental coding in the ontogeny of sound systems. In C. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoehl-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 605–631). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Wode, H. (1993). The development of phonological abilities. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression εt regression in language (pp. 415-438). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Wode, H. (1994). Introduction. L1 and L2 phonology: Looking ahead. In M. Yava (Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 175-179). San Diego, CA: Singular.

Young-Scholten, M. (1994). On positive evidence and ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 193−214.

Young-Scholten, M. (2002). "Orthographic input in L2 phonological development". In Burmeister, P.; Piske, T.; Rohde, A. An integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier. pp. 263–279.

Young-Scholten, M., & Archibald, J. (2000). Second language syllable structure. In J. Archibald (Ed.) Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 64-101). Oxford, UK: Blackwell publishers.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.5p.208

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.