Language Countertrading In Courtroom Exchanges in Nigeria: A Discursive Study

Tunde Opeibi

Abstract


The view of discourse as serving transactional and interactional purposes cascades into practical realities in courtroom exchanges. As an institutional setting, the law courts exemplify a typical social domain where language provides the basis for conveying information; promoting meaningful and goal-directive social and interactional exchanges. Whether in civil or criminal litigations, the proceedings rely on linguistic facilities for accomplishing communicative actions. Language thus remains the sole ‘legal tender’ and the major instrument for prosecuting the cases and resolving conflicts brought before the courts.

This paper is motivated by the increasing but interesting challenges lay participants face in the courtrooms as they are confronted with language use that is different from their day-to-day experiences. The study discusses these peculiar communicative interactions in a law court in Lagos, Nigeria against the backdrop of very little efforts in courtroom discourse in non-native English speaking contexts.

Specifically, this paper focuses mainly on an aspect of courtroom discourse (i.e. examination-in-chief), a procedural questioning session which provides the basis for presenting the plaintiff’s arguments and information through the plaintiff’s counsel. The data used in this work were drawn from a civil suit filed in a Lagos High Court by a complainant in connection with a dispute on a property in central Lagos.

Using insights from discourse analysis and theoretical construct based on Genre Analysis (e.g. Hasan’s Generic Structure Potential) as well as other relevant constructs, the study analyses discourse features and strategies deployed by active participants in the proceedings.

The study finds that legal proceedings contextualized within a given L2 sociolinguistic and lingual-legal jurisdiction helps to project some of the peculiar features of a non-native English in legal domains. Apart from identifying some peculiar discourse patterns that are institutional-based, courtroom proceedings in this legal culture demonstrates discourse strategies that conflate with similar features in other jurisdictions. That only supports the belief of a common source for most legal systems with colonial experiences as well as the universal applicability of judicial decisions. The complex natures of legal texts that are highlighted merely corroborate previous works in this area. The study concludes by demonstrating how language is used to perform actions that are goal-directive in this domain using the Speech Act model.

 


Keywords


Legal discourse, courtroom, discourse strategies, examination-in-chief, genre analysis, speech act, L2 context

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, Q. (2011). A Discourse Analysis of Power Relations in Doctor-Patient Interactions in Lagos. PhD Seminar Paper: University of Lagos.

Adetugbo, A. (1990). Language and the Law in Nigeria. Ogun Journal of Arts, Faculty of Arts, Ogun State University, Nigeria.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.

Awonusi, V. O. (1996). Politics and Politicians for Sale: An Examination of Advertising English in Nigeria’s Political Transition Programme. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia (XXX), 108-129.

Atkinson, J. M. & Drew, F. (1979). Order in Court, London: Edward Arnold.

Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View, London: Continuum.

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carlen, P. (1976). Magistrates’ Justice, London: Martin Robertson.

Cook, G. (1992). The Discourse of Advertising, London: Routledge.

Dadzie, A.B.K & Awonusi, S. (2009). Nigerian English: Influences and Characteristics, Lagos: Sam Iroanusi Publications.

Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analysing Talk at Work: An Introduction. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eggins, S. & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing Casual Conversation, London and Washington: Cassell

Emerson, R. M. (1969). Judging Delinquents, Chicago: Aldine.

Geis, M. L. (1982). The Language of Television Advertising, New York: Academic Press.

Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal Discourse, London: Macmillan.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introductory to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hassan, R. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspect of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective, London: Oxford University Press.

Harris, S. (1980). Language Interaction in Magistrates’ Courts, Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Nottingham.

Harris, S. (1981). The Function of Directives in Court Discourse. Nottingham Linguistic Circular. (10), 109 - 31.

Harris, S. (1984a). Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrates’ Courts’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, (49), 5-28.

Harris, S. (1988). Court Discourse as a Genre. In R. Fawcett & D. Young (eds), New Development in Systemic Linguistics, (2), 94-112. London: Printer Publishers.

Hassan, R. (1985). The Nursery Tale as a Genre, Nottingham Linguistic Circular, (13), 71-102.

Kachru, B.B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle. In R. Quirk & W. Widdowson (eds), English in the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales.

Martin, J. & David, R. (2008). Genre Relations, London: Equinox.

McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse for Language Teachers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mead, R. (1965). Courtroom Discourse, English Language Research Monograph (9), University of Birmingham.

Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The Language of the Law, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

O’Barr, W. (1982). Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power and Strategy in the Courtroom, London: Academic Press.

Opeibi, O.B (2008). Between Obscurity and Clarity in Nigerian Legal Discourse: Aspects of Language Use in Selected Written Texts. In Wagner, Anne and Sophie Cacciaguidi- Fahy(eds). Obscurity and Clarity inthe Law: Prospects and Challenges Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 221-233.

------------------(2003). The Acts of a Speech Act: An Examination of a Courtroom Discourse. Lagos Note and Records, A Journal of the Faculty of Arts, University of Lagos, (IX), 172-195.

-----------------(1995). Investigating Language, Meaning and Context in Legal Discourse: An Analysis of Selected Texts from Court Proceedings, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Lagos.

Pilnick, A. (1997). “Pharmacy Counselling”: A Study of the Pharmacist/Patient Encounter Using Conversational Analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.

Sacks, H (1984). Notes on Methodology. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tiersma, P. (2008). Language and Law. In J. Gibbons & M. Teresa Turell, Dimensions in Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 7-25.

Schiffrin, D. (1988). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.

Woodbury, H. (1984). Strategic Questions in Court, Semiotica. 48(3-4), 197-228.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.5p.49

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.