International Business Company CEOs’ Public Apologies and their Users’ Responses

Mohd Azidan bin Abdul Jabar, Vahid Nimehchisalem, Mahdi Nadhim Baqer

Abstract


An important aspect of the emerging user care discourse is the apologies offered by companies. Previous research has focused on public apologies; however, there has been little focus on the users’ comments in response to apologies. This case study aimed to investigate (i) the structure of the public apologies in terms of their frequency and sequence, and (ii) the users’ responses to these apologies as indicated in their comments. Four public apologies were purposively selected: They were all presented in English by the executives and posted on Facebook between 2011 and 2015. The responses to these apologies were also collected. The results of content analysis indicate that apology strategies, including taking full responsibility, asking for forgiveness, being sincere, and being published in a timely manner are the most effective strategies to elicit positive responses. The results have useful implications for research and practice in the area.

Keywords


Apology Strategies, Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), Crises Management, User Comments, User satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan, A., & McKillop, D. (2010). The health implications of apologizing after an adverse event. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 22(2), 126-131

Ancarno, C. (2015). When are public apologies ‘successful’? Focus on British and French apology press uptakes. Journal of Pragmatics, 84, 139-153.

Barnes, E. G., & Mattson, E. (2010). The Fortune 500 and Social Media: A Longitudinal Study of Blogging and Twitter usage by America’s Largest Companies. Retrieved April, 4, 2011.

Benoit, W. L. (1995). Sears’ repair of its auto service image: Image restoration discourse in the corporate sector. Communication Studies, 46(1-2), 89-105.

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies, 31, 1-34.

Brocato, E. D., Peterson, R. A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2012). When things go wrong: Account strategy following a corporate crisis event. Corporate Reputation Review, 15(1), 35-51.

Burnett, J. J. (1998). A strategic approach to managing crises. Public relations review, 24(4), 475-488.

Cohen, J. (2002). Legislating Apology: The Pros and Cons, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev, 819, 824-27.

Coombs, W. T. (1999). Information and compassion in crisis responses: A test of their effects. Journal of public relations research, 11(2), 125-142. ‏

Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management communication quarterly, 8(4), 447-476.

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2010). The kindle crisis: Exploring ways to evaluate online crisis communication. Paper published in the proceedings of 13th International Public Relations Research Conference (p. 207).

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2008). Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology's role and value in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 34(3), 252-257. ‏

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165-186

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study in crisis communication. Journal of public relations research, 8(4), 279-295.

Feeney, B. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87(5), 631.

Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2010). Apologizing in a globalizing world: crisis communication and apologetic ethics. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(4), 350-364. ‏

Fuchs-Burnett, T. (2002). Mass public corporate apology. Dispute resolution journal, 57(2), 26.

Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B. (2000). Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and applied social psychology, 22(4), 291-300.

Harris, S., Grainger, K., & Mullany, L. (2006). The pragmatics of political apologies. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 715-737.

Hearit, K. M. (2006). Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing. Routledge. ‏

Hearit, K. M. (2005). Apologia strategies. Encyclopedia of public relations, 1, 38-40

Jassim, A. H. & Nimehchisalem, V. (2016). EFL Arab Students’ Apology Strategies in Relation to Formality and Informality of the Context. Ampersand, 3, 117-125.

Kalinina, G. S., & Gabdreeva, N. V. (2020). The Intention of “Apology” in Speech Etiquette: Based on the Material of Different Structural Languages. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 11(S), 292-299.

Kellerman, B. (2006). When should a leader apologize and when not? Harvard business review, 84(4), 72-81.

Ki, E. J., & Nekmat, E. (2014). Situational crisis communication and interactivity: Usage and effectiveness of Facebook for crisis management by Fortune 500 companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 140-147.

Kiambi, D. M., & Shafer, A. (2016). Corporate crisis communication: Examining the interplay of reputation and crisis response strategies. Mass Communication and Society, 19(2), 127-148. ‏

Manika, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Bourlakis, M. (2015). Can a CEO's YouTube apology following a service failure win users' hearts? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 87-95. ‏

McCullough, M. E., Worthington Jr, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(2), 321.‏

Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Hornsey, M. J. (2015). Apologies demanded yet devalued: Normative dilution in the age of apology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 133-136. ‏

Pandit, N. R. (1996). The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The qualitative report, 2(4), 1-15.

Petrucci, C. J. (2002). Apology in the criminal justice setting: Evidence for including apology as an additional component in the legal system. Behavioral sciences & the law, 20(4), 337-362. ‏

O’Brien, T. C., Meares, T. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2020). Reconciling Police and Communities with Apologies, Acknowledgements, or Both: A Controlled Experiment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 202-215.

Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 26(1), 127-140. ‏

Smith, A. K., & Bolton, R. N. (2002). The effect of users' emotional responses to service failures on their recovery effort evaluations and satisfaction judgments. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 30(1), 5-23.

Tucker, S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Reid, E. M., & Elving, C. (2006). Apologies and transformational leadership. Journal of business ethics, 63(2), 195.

Varma, S. B., Paramasivam, S., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2019). Linguistic construction of a winning apology. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 3-31.

Wirtz, J., & Mattila, A. S. (2004). Consumer responses to compensation, speed of recovery and apology after a service failure. International Journal of service industry management.

Wohl, M. J., Hornsey, M. J., & Philpot, C. R. (2011). A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and a staircase model of effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5(1), 70-100.

Xu, S. (2019). A Contrastive Study on the Strategies in the Public Apologies and the Daily Apologies. Paper published in the 9th International Conference on Education and Social Science (ICESS 2019) Proceedings (pp. 611-616). Shenyang, China, March 29-31. Retrieved on 18/08/2019 from https://webofproceedings.org/proceedings_series/proceeding/ICESS+2019.html#location




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.10n.5p.9

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.