America in Pakistani Print Media: A Semiotic Discourse Analysis based Study of Pak-Us Relationship

Muhammad Akber Sajid, Muhammad Riaz Khan

Abstract


Print media semiotic discourses are one of the best sites for ideological investment and their role is very significant in the production and dissemination of certain ideology. The aim of the present study is to critically decode the semiotic discourse(s) of Pakistani English newspaper DAWN (daily) with special reference to the representation of Pak- Us relationship through the analysis of the semiotics discourses. The data for the present research has been collected from the mentioned newspaper. The time span for data collection ranges from October 2018 to December 2018. Out of ten (10) caricatures which represent Pakistan attempting to survive at its own rather than depending on America one was purposively selected for linguistic and semiotic analyses. The study is descriptive and utilizes qualitative research design. For this purpose, the researchers have devised an amended research model by drawing upon Fairclough (1995), Kress (2010) and Kruger’s (2000) research models to analyse linguistic, semiotic and focus group discussions data. The semiotic analysis has also been validated by incorporating the remarks of focus group participants. Based on the analysis of data the study concludes that noting is absolute in politics as far as Pak- Us relations through semiotic discourses are concerned. Additionally, the research reveals that print media semiotic discourses work insidiously to represent socio- political changes by employing linguistic and meta-linguistic devices and techniques.

Keywords


Semiotic Discourse, Ideology, Pak- Us Relations Representations, Newspapers, Political Discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of semiology. Macmillan.

Barthes, R. (1973). Mythologies (terj. A. Lavers). St Alban: Paladin.

Bolter, J. D. (2008). Barthes, Roland. The International Encyclopedia of Communication.

Boorstin, D. (1963). The Image, or what Happened to the American Dream.-Harmondsworth,(Mddx).

Danesi, M. (2018). Understanding media semiotics. Bloomsbury Academic.

Lusekelo, A. (2016). The The Language of Caricatures in Tanzania’s Political Landscape: The Case of Selected, Masoud Kipanya’s Cartoons. Sanaa: Journal of African Arts, Media and Cultures, 1(1), 22-37.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Fawcett, R. P. (2015). The Semiotics of Culture and Language: Volume 2: Language and Other Semiotic Systems of Culture. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hartshorne, C. (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1, pp. 1931-35). P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hodge, R., & Kress, G. R. (1993). Language as ideology (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.

Ivanič, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of second language writing, 10(1-2), 3-33.

Jakobson, R. (1975). Coup d'oeil sur le développement de la sémiotique (Vol. 3). Indiana University.

Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Taylor & Francis.

Kristeva, J. (1969). Semelotike.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews.

Hartshorne, C. (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1, pp. 1931-35). P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mwetulundila, R., & Kangira, J. (2015). An Analysis of Rhetoric and Humour in Dudley’s Political Cartoons Published in the Namibian Newspaper in 2012. International Journal of Research, 63.

Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A. (1981). Political cartoons as rhetorical form: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communications Monographs, 48(3), 197-236.

Zhang, X., & Sheng, J. (2017). A Peircean semiotic interpretation of a social sign. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 163-173.

Price, J. (2003). AS Media Studies. Nelson Thornes.

Sapir, E. (1921). An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: the basics. Taylor & Francis.

Smith, P. (2019). ‘Getting Arno’: the New Yorker cartoon caption competition. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 1-14.

Yap, F. H., Chan, A. S. L., & Wai, B. L. M. (2018). Constructing political identities through characterization metaphor, humor and sarcasm: an analysis of the 2012 Legislative Council Election Debates in Hong Kong. In Not Just a Laughing Matter (pp. 147-167). Springer, Singapore.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & society, 17(3), 359-383.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.4p.71

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.