Nigerian Undergraduates’ Awareness of Metadiscourse and its Relationship with their Persuasive Writing Quality

Muhammad Mukhtar Aliyu, Shehu Muhammad Korau

Abstract


Persuasive writing in second (L2) or Foreign Language (FL) is found to be a very challenging task for many undergraduates. Metadiscourse are devices used to help writers to make a connection with the audience and express ideas clearly. However, many Nigerian undergraduates are not fully aware of or do not appropriately utilise these devices in their writing. Also, little attention has been paid to the devices by researchers in the Nigerian context. Therefore, this study investigates undergraduates’ awareness of metadiscourse and its relationship with their persuasive writing performance using a correlational research design. An intact class of 56 third-year undergraduates in a local university in Nigeria was selected for the study. Data for the study were collected through a writing task in English, and a questionnaire. The essays were graded using a validated scale. The questionnaire was analysed using SPSS software. Findings of the study show that the participants have a low awareness of metadiscourse. The findings also reveal that there is a positive relationship between the participants’ awareness of metadiscourse and their persuasive writing quality. The study gives insight to researchers and lecturers, not only in the language field but in other areas, on how to improve the students’ awareness and use of metadiscourse which would eventually develop writing performance. Finally, the study makes some recommendations for further studies.

Keywords


Awareness, ESL Writing, Metadiscourse, Nigeria, Persuasive Essay

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwardeen, N. H., Luyee, E. O., Gabriel, J. I., & Kalajahi, S. A. R. (2013). An analysis: The usage of metadiscourse in argumentative writing by Malaysian tertiary level of students. English Language Teaching, 6 (9), 83-96.

Beauvais, P. J. (1989). A speech act theory of metadiscourse. Written Communication, 6(1), 11–30.

Bodunde, H. a., & Sotiloye, B. S. (2013). A critique of undergraduate students’ writing skill in an ESL setting: Samples from the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. World Journal of English Language, 3(2), 10–21.

Bogdanović, V., & Mirović, I. (2018). Young researchers writing in ESL and the use of metadiscourse: Learning the ropes. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 813–830.

Dastjerdi, H. V. & Shirzad, M. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction of metadiscourse markers on EFL learners' writing performance. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS)2 (2), 155-174.

Gholami, J., Nejad, S. R., & Pour, L. J. (2014). Metadiscourse markers misuses: A study of EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (2014), 580 – 589.

Gillett, A., Hammond, A., & Martala, M. (2009). Successful academic writing. London: Pearson Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.

Haruna, H. H., Ibrahim, B., Haruna, M., Ibrahim, B. & Yunus, K. (2018). Metadiscourse in students’ academic writing: Case study of Umaru Musa Yar’adua University and Al-Qalam University Katsina. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8 (7) 83-92.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. New York: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2005b). Metadiscourse: Mapping interaction in academic writing. University of London, UK http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/njes/article/view/417

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. New York: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2008). Metadiscourse. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Jones, J. F. (2011). Using metadiscourse to improve coherence in academic writing. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 1-14.

Ngadda, Z. Y., & Nwoke, A. (2014). An analytical study of errors in the written English of undergraduate engineering students, ATBU a case study. Journal of Education and Practice 5 (38) 8-16.

Nimehchisalem, V. (2010). Developing an analytic scale for evaluating argumentative writing of students in a Malaysian public university. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Shafique, H., Shahbaz, M. & Hafeez, M. R. (2019). Metadiscourse in research writing: A study of native English and Pakistani research articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 376-385.

Silver, M. (2003). The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 359-374.

Spivey, N. N. (1995). Written discourse: A constructive perspective. In L. P. Steffe, & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp. 313-330). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tan, O. S. (2004) Students’ experiences in problem‐based learning: Three blind mice episode or educational innovation? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 169-184.

Tan, H. (2011) Metadiscourse features in the persuasive essays of undergraduate writers. Unpublished PhD thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Tan, H. & Eng, W. B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in the persuasive writing of Malaysian undergraduate students. English Language Teaching; Vol. 7(7), 26-39.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.1p.40

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.