Increasing Investment and Autonomy in Second-language Learners – an Empirical Study Looking for the L2 Self

Gaston Bacquet

Abstract


Inspired by years of research into the areas of motivation and learner autonomy, this empirical study aimed at investigating ways of developing both of these dimensions in a Myanmar classroom; most current research output show results of what has been done mostly in Western context or in countries with strong ties to Western culture, such as China, South Korea or Japan.  To the best of my knowledge, none of the literature or studies related to Myanmar, a country that presents a very unique set of circumstances for English-language teachers: not only had English been banned in all of its forms for nearly 40 years after the military government came to power (closing down libraries, English-language publications and eradicating the English curriculum from schools), but the country follows a Confucian system of education, which places greater value in memorization than understanding and in strict obedience rather than the development of critical thought (Purdie et al 1996; Han and Yang, 2001). Because of the Confucian belief in the importance of unequal relations in education (Guo ,2016) students are not only discouraged from asking questions but according to their own testimony, even physically punished. With these considerations in mind, the purpose of this study was to investigate the degree to which both autonomy and intrinsic motivation could be developed in Burmese, thus breaking away from the educational model they have followed so far, and to ascertain whether or not such dimensions had an impact in their learning outcomes. Nineteen Intermediate-level Burmese students, enrolled in the General English program at the British Council Myanmar, worked for six weeks twice a week carrying out tasks designed to boost their intrinsic motivation and develop a greater sense of autonomy, to assess if these dimensions had an impact in the students’ learning outcomes and to determine the degree and type of pedagogical interventions needed to facilitate that. Students answered three questionnaires, wrote three journal entries reflecting on their experience as learners and as subjects in the project, and engaged in a variety of tasks which will be described. Additionally, three students were interviewed in person to delve deeper into the issues described above. The first questionnaire was designed to help learners reflect on their own role as learners, The second one was based on Dörnyei’s Ten Commandments for Motivating Language. The final questionnaire was a reflection on the entirety of the course and changes students had experienced throughout. It asked questions concerning motivation, autonomy and identity and it serves as the final data–collection instrument by which to ascertain if any changes occurred in their behaviour, attitude or thinking patterns.


Keywords


Autonomy, Motivation, Identity, Self-directed Learning, Agency, Three Selves, Language Learning, Investment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antaki, C. & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in Talk. London: Sage.

Bailey, K. M., & Nunan, D. (1996). Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and Researching Autonomy. New York: Routledge

Boyatzis, R. & Akrivou, K (2006) The ideal self as the driver of intentional change, Journal of Management Development, 25(7), 624-642.

Breen, M. P. & S. Mann (1997). Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. In Benson & Voller (eds.), 132–149.

Burton, E., Linn, R. (1994) Performance-Based Assessment: Implications of Task Specificity, Journal Educational Measurements: Issues and Practice, 13(1), 5-8.

Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum

deCharms, R (1968) Personal causation; the internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56

Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (38). Perspectives on motivation ( 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.

Dickinson, L., Carver, D. (1980) Learning how to learn: Steps towards self-direction in foreign language learning in schools, English Language Teaching Journal, 35 (1), 1-7.

Dornyei, Z & Csizer, K (1998), Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study, Language teaching research 2 (3), 203-229.

Dornyei, Z (2001) Teaching and researching motivation, London: Longman.

Dornyei, Z (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition, New York: Lawrence Elbaurn.

Dornyei, Z., Ushioda, E (2009) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self, Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Foord, D., Barber, D. (2014) From English Teacher to Learner Coach. London: The Round and Amazon Digital Services.

Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Newbury House: Rowley

Guo, L. (2016), ‘Research of Confucianism Education Method in Chinese College Students Ideological and Political Education’, Scientific Research: Creative Education, 7(7), pp. 1051 – 1055.

Han, M., X. Yang (2001), ‘Educational Assessment in China: Lessons from History and Future Prospects’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 8(1) pp. 5–10.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.6p.54

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.