Peer Assessment in a Blended Translation Course: Students’ Perceptions, Motivation and their Self-perceived Translational Skill Development

Thi Lan Huynh, Uyen Nu Thuy Nguyen

Abstract


Peer assessment (PA) has become as an influential educational tool in higher education for many years. However, there is little evidence about technology-facilitated PA in the field of Translation. Therefore, this study attempts to fill in the gap in the literature with an aim to scrutinize the students’ perceptions and motivation toward the adoption of a five-week online PA activity in a Translation course. The correlation between students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and self-perceived skill enhancement is further explored.  In order to gather research data, thirty-six third-year students were asked to respond to two questionnaires about the perceptions and motivation of online PA in a five-point Likert-type scale. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyze the collected data. A number of findings have been revealed by the end of the study. Firstly, the students exhibited a highly positive perception and a high level of motivation in participating in this online task. Secondly, throughout the activity, the participants valued intrinsic motivational factors more importantly than extrinsic ones. Thirdly, the findings highlighted that intrinsic motivation stood out to be the significant predictor of self-perceived translation skill improvement, whereas no statistically significant relationship between extrinsic motivation and a sense of skill enhancement suggested a negligible impact of external factors perceived by students. Potential implications for translation pedagogy and research are also included in the study. The results of this pioneering study, consequently, add to the scarce literature in the local translation landscape by proposing a possible alternative to the face-to-face peer assessment format as well as paving the way for future peer assessment practice and research in blended learning courses.


Keywords


Online Peer assessment, Revised CoI, Students’ Perception, Students’ Motivation, Translation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, K. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students writing process. Active Learning in Higher Educcation, 17(3), 1–14.

Bauer, C., Figl, K., Derntl, M., Beran, P., & Kabicher, S. (2009). The student view on online peer reviews. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1595496.1562892.

Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489–520.

Butler, S. A., & Hodge, S. . (2001). Enhancing student trust through peer assessment in physical education. Physical Educator, 58, 30–41.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

DiGiovanni, E. & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal, 55(3), 263–272.

Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(2), 175–187.

Garrison, D. ., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.

Goyal, E., & Tambe, S. (2015). Effectiveness of Moodle-Enabled Blended Learning in Private Indian Business School Teaching Niche. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(2), 14–22.

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussion: a case study of peer faciliation. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1111–1124.

Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., Mc Murray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. Routledge. London and New York.

Hoskins, S. L., & Van Hoof, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 177–192.

Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697.

Jonnavithula, L. (2008). Improving the interfaces of online discussion forums to enhance learning support. Massey University.

Kim-Godwin, Y. S., Turrise, S., Lawson, S., & Scott, M. (2018). Student perceptions of peer evaluation in an online RN-to-BSN course. Nurse Educator, 43(6), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000519.

Kotzer, S., Elran, Y. (2012). Learning and teaching with Moodle-based E-learning environments, combining learning skills and content in the fields of Math and Science & Technology. 1st Moodle Research Conference, 122–131.

Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567–605.

Law, K. M. Y., & Breznik, K. (2017). Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: Among engineering and non-engineering students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 1–18.

Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers and Education, 136(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021.

Law, K. M. Y., Lee, V. C. S., & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers and Education, 55(1), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.007.

Li, L., & Gao, F. (2016). The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 885–900.

Lin, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers and Education, 113, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.014.

Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.

Liou, H.-C., & Peng, Z.-Y. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37(3), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005.

Lopes, A. P. (2011). Teaching with Moodle in Higher Educations : Polytechnic Institute of Oporto – IPP. INTED2011 Proceedings, 970–976.

Lynch, D. J. (2006). Motivational factors, learning strategies and resources management as predictors of course grades. College Student Journal, 40(2), 423–428.

Martinho, M., Almeida, P. A., & Teixeira-Dias, J. (2014). Fostering Students Questioning through Moodle: Does it Work? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(4), 2537–2542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.607.

Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004

Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interests: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436.

Moloudi, M. (2011). Online and face-to-face peer review: Measures of implementation in ESL writing classes. Asian EFL Journal, 52, 52, 1-73.

Ngan, S. C., & Law, K. M. Y. (2015). Exploratory Network Analysis of Learning Motivation Factors in e-Learning Facilitated Computer Programming Courses. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(4), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0223-0.

Nguyen, V. A. (2017). A peer assessment approach to project based blended learning course in a Vietnamese higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2141–2157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9539-0.

Núñez, J. L., & Bolaños-Medina, A. (2018). Predictors of problem-solving in translation: implications for translator training. Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 12(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359762

Pool, J., Reitsma, G., & Van den Berg, D. (2017). Revised Community of Inquiry: Examining Learning Presence in a Blended Mode of Delivery. Online Learning, 21(3), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.866.

Roberts, T. S. (2006). Self, Peer and Group Assessment in E-Learning. https://doi.org/doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-965-6

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers and Education, 59(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011.

Shea, P., Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., & Shoubang, J. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 89–95.

Shea, P., Pickett, A., & Pelz, W. (2003). A follow-up investigation fo “teaching presence” in the Suny learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61–80.

Song, H.-D., & Grabowski, B. L. (2006). Stimulating Intrinsic Motivation for Problem-Solving Using Goal-Oriented Contexts and Peer Group Composition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(5), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-0128-6.

Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging charateristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 59–70.

Sproule, J., Martindale, R., Wang, J., Allison, P., Nash, C., & Gray, S. (2013). Investigating the experience of outdoor and adventurous project work in an educational setting using a self-determination framework. European Physical Education Review, 19(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X13495629.

Teng, H.-C. (2018). A Study of Peer Assessment for EFL Academic Oral Presentations. Asian ESP Journal, 14(1), 413–433.

Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.

Topping, K. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 20–27.

Topping, K. (2018). Using Peer Assessment to Inspire Reflection and Learning, 103–127. Milton: Routledge.

Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, M. J. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241–252.

Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Taiwan college students’ self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.01.001

Wang, K., & Han, C. (2013). Accomplishment in the multitude of counsellors: Peer feedback in translation training. Translation and Interpreting, 5(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/105202.2013.a05

Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 616–622.

White, E. (2009). Student Perspectives of Peer Assessment for Learning in a Public Speaking Course. Asian EFL Journal, 33, 1–55.

Xie, K., DeBacker, T. K. & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: the role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 68–78.

Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students’ motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916-930.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.5p.52

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.