Is Corrective Feedback in the ESL Classroom Really Effective? A Background Study

Gaston Bacquet


The use, range and efficacy of different types of corrective feedback in the ESL classroom have been widely researched, especially over the past 30 years. This paper attempts to dissect such research and to provide language teachers with an understanding of the background literature and theoretical views surrounding the subject. By summarizing different, often contrasting views on what corrective feedback is, how it works and how effective it is (or not), I strive to provide ESL teachers with a deeper understanding of the available literature and different perspectives that can hopefully better inform and shape our practice. The paper first provides definition of key terms related to corrective feedback, it proceeds to explore a range of theories and views and to look into the core studies regarding both written and spoken feedback and it ends with a short discussion on how these finding are relevant for ESL teachers.


Feedback, Fluency, Recasts, Metalinguistic Clues, Elicitation, Explicit, Implicit, Correction, Grammar Correction, Esl, Direct Feedback, Indirect Feedback

Full Text:



Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214.

Bitchener, J., Knoch, U., 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12 (3).

Brown, R. (1973) A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Burhans, C. (1983) The Teaching of Writing and the Knowledge Gap. College English, 45 (7), 639 – 656.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357–386.

Caulk, N. (1994) Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly 28: 181-188.

Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27, 29–46.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chaudron, C. (1984) Effects of feedback on revision. RELC Journal, 15, 1-14

Clifford, J. (1981). Composing in stages: Effects of feedback on revision. Research in the Teac ing of English, IS, 37-53.

DeKeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77, 501–514.

Ellis, R. (1991). Grammar teaching-practice or consciousness-raising. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Second language acquisition and second language pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisi- tion. In K. Bartovi-Harlig & Z Dörnyei (Eds.), Themes in SLA Research (AILA Review, Vol. 19, pp. 18–41). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M.& Takashima, H. (2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36 (3), 353 – 371.

Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 583–593.

Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10.

Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of Error in Second-Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Xiii – 152.

Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to Respond to Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 165-193.

Fox, T. (1990). The social uses of writing: : Politics and pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Friedman, A.I. (1983) Learning to write: first language/second language. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Gaskill, W. (1980) Correction in native speaker – nonnative speaker conversation. In D. Larssen-Freeman, ed. Discourse analysis in second language research, 125-137. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Gass, S. M. (1990). Second and foreign language learning: Same, different or none of the above? In B. VanPatten & J. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition (pp. 34-44). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.

Harley, B. and M. Swain. 1984. The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Griper, and A. Howatt (eds.) Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 291-311.

Hairston, M. 1982. The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College composition and communication. 33.1.76-88.

Hawkins, R. (1987) Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research 3(1), 20-25.

Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387-398.

Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1988). Learning grammatical structures in a foreign language: Modeling versus feedback. The French Review, 61, 910–922.

Hillocks, G. (2006) Research in writing, secondary school 1984-2003. L1 Educational Studies in Languages and Literature, 6(2), 27-51.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principle and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45–77). London: Academic Press.

Leki, I. (1991) Preferences for ESL students for error correction in college level writing clases. Foreign Language Annals, 24 (3), 203-218.

Li, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning Journal 60, 309 – 365.

Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,12, 429–448.

Lin, Grace Hui Chin & Paul Shih Chieh Chien (2009) An investigation into Effectiveness of Peer Feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages, Fortune Institute of Technology, 3, 79 – 87.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acqui-sition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lyster, R., L. Ranta, (1997) “Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20: 37-66.

Makino, T (1993) Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal, 47, 337-341.

Mazurkevich, I. (1984). Dative questions and markedness. In F. R. Eckman, L. H. Bell, and D. Nelson (eds.) Universals of second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 119 131.

McTear, M. (1975) Structure and Categories of Foreign Language Teaching Sequences. In “Working Papers: Language Teaching Classroom Research”, edited by R. Allwright. University of Essex, Department of Language and Linguistics.

Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-770.

Meriwether, L. (1997). Math at the Snack Table. Young Children, 52 (5).

Nelson, G.& Murphy, J.M. (1992) An L2 writing group: task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing 1(3), 171-193.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a metaanalytic review. In: R. Ellis (Ed.), Form-focussed instruction and second language learning (pp. 157-213). New York: Black.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2010). Timeline: Research synthesis. Language Teaching, 43, 461-479.

Pinker, S. (1989). Resolving a learnability paradox in the acquisition of the verb lexicon. In M. L. Rice & R. L. Schifelbusch (Eds.), The teachability of language. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Purves, A. (1986). The teacher as reader: An anatomy. College English, 46, 259-265.

Rollinson, P. (1998) Peer-response and revision in an ESL writing group: a case study. PhD thesis, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in ESLthe writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30

Rose, M. (1981) Sophisticated, innefective books: The dimantling of process in composition texts. College Composition and Communication, 32, 65-74.

Salica, C. 1981. Testing a model of corrective discourse. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.

Santos, T. (1992). Ideology in composition: Ll and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing. 1, 1-15.

Sarandi, H. (2016). Oral Corrective Feedback: A Question of Classification and Appplication. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 235 – 246.

Schmidt, R.W., (1990) “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning”, Applied Linguistics 11: 129-158.

Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195-202.

Sheen, Y., 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.

Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32,203–234.

Shafer, J., Walker. A & Liams, M (2004) “Not in my classroom: teachers attitudes towards English Language Learners in the mainstream classroom” NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 136 – 160.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensibleoutput in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tedick, D. and de Gortari, B. (1998) Research on error correction and implications for classroom teaching [Electronic version]. ACIE Newsletter: The Bridge from Research to Practice 1 (3), 1–6.

Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385–395.

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning Journal, 46, 327-369.

Van Patten, B. (1986) Second Language Acquisition Research and the Learning/Teaching of Spanish: Some research findings and their implications. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57-67.

White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 2, 133–161.

Young, R. (1978) Paradigms and problems: needed research and rhetorical invention. In C.R. Cooper and I.Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (29-47). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Zhang, S. (1995) Re-examining the affective advantage of peer-feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209 – 222


El Tatawy, M. (2002) Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition. Working Papers, Teacher College, Columbia University, 2 (2).

DeVries, B., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Van Hout, R. The Role of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning: New Research Possibilities by Combining CALL and Speech Technology, Center for Language and Speech Technology, Radboud University, the Netherlands.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.