Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions and Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback: Do They Match?

Fateme Saeb

Abstract


Perceptions and perspectives about corrective feedback (CF) have recently attracted some attention in the CF literature. Few studies, however, have delved into students’ and teachers’ CF perceptions and preferences and compared them. This study is an attempt to explore Iranian EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions and preferences for different amounts and types of oral corrective feedback. Two parallel questionnaires were used to gather quantitative and qualitative data from twenty eight teachers and eighty six of their students. Results revealed significant differences between teachers’ and students’ perceptions about the amounts and types of CF and also about different types of errors to be corrected. Contrary to their teachers, students in this study were found to be seeking large amounts of explicit corrective feedback provided by the teacher.  As for the pedagogical implications, ‘meta-correction’ is suggested as a solution to the problem of conflicting CF perceptions of students and teachers and to improve and enhance error correction practices within Iranian EFL context.

 


Keywords


Oral corrective feedback, Perceptions, Students’ preferences, Learner autonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amrhein H.R. & Nassaji H. (2010) Written Corrective Feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied linguistics, 13, 95 – 127.

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005).The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

Brown. A. (2009). Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. Modern Language Journal, 93, 46-60.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x

Cathcart, R. L., & Olsen, J. E. W. B. (1976). Teachers' and students' preferences for error correction of classroom conversation errors. In J. F. Fanselow and R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '76: Selections based on teaching done at the 10th annual TESOL convention (pp. 41-53). Washington: TESOL.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of l2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267 296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Chenoweth, N. A., R. Day, A. E. Chun & S. Luppescu (1983). Attitudes and preferences of ESL students to error correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 79–87.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000310

Clark, H., & Ouellette, M. (2008). Students' noticing and incorporation of written feedback: A snapshot of ESOL writing instructors' commentary on adult ESOL students' essays. Master's Thesis, University of Texas.

Diab, R. L. (2005). Teachers' and students' beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study. TESL Canada Journal, 23, 28-43.

Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1977). Remarks on the creativity in language acquisition. In M. Burt, H. Dulay and M. Finochchiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp. 95-126). New York: Regents Publishing Company.

Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (ed.), 339 360.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001

Farahani, A., & Salajegheh, S. (2015). Iranian teachers' and students' preferences for correction of classroom oral errors: Opinions and responses. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 14-25.

Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588049

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second language Writing, 10, 161-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Garrett, P., & Shortall, T. (2002). Learners' evaluations of teacher-fronted and student- centered classroom activities. Language Teaching Research, 6, 25-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr096oa

Gass, S. & K. Lewis (2007). Perceptions of interactional feedback: Differences between heritage language learners and non-heritage language learners. In A. Mackey (ed.), 79–99.

Green, J. M. (1993). Student attitudes toward communicative and non-communicative activities: Do enjoyment and effectiveness go together? Modern Language Journal, 77, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01938.x

Han, J., & Jung. J. K. (2007) Patterns and preferences of corrective feedback and learner repair. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23, 243-260.

Hartshorn, K. (2008). The effects of manageable corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. Master's thesis, Brigham Young University.

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learning receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4

Hendrickson, J. M. (1977). Error analysis and selective correction in the adult ESL classroom: An experiment. ERIC Document Reproduction Services, ED 135260.

Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 64, 216-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1980.tb05188.x

Hillocks, G. Jr. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the composition process. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261-278.

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Jean, G. & D. Simard (2011). Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students' and teachers' beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals 44.4, 465–492.

Jeon, M., & Kang, I. (2005). Investigating student preferences in error correction in Korean-language teaching. American Association of Teachers of Korean, 5 (10),

Retrieved from http://www.aatk.org/html/KLA10/MJeonIKang.pdf

Krashen S. D., & Selinger, H. W. (1975). The essential contributions of formal instructions in adult second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 9(2), 173-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3585484

Krashen, S. D. (1977). Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. D. Brown, C. Yorio, and R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 144-158). Washington: TESOL.

Lalande, J. F. II (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 66, 140-149.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x

Lasagabaster,D.&J. M. Sierra (2005). Error correction: Students' versus teachers' perceptions. Language Awareness 14, 112–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668828

Lee, E. J. (2013) Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41, 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022

Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x

Loewen, S. & T. Nabei (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (ed.), 361–377.

Loewen, S., S. Li, F. Fei, A. Thompson, K. Nakatsukasa, S. Ahn & X. Chen (2009). L2 learners' beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal 93.1, 91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 1, 1-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

McCargar, D. (1993). Teacher and student role expectations: Cross-cultural differences and implications. The Modern Language Journal, 77,192-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01963.x

Montgomery, J., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 82-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002

Morris, F., & Tarone, E. (2003). Impact of classroom dynamics on the effectiveness of recasts in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 53, 325-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00219

Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers' communica¬tive style and students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 23-33.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00003

Noels, K.A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners' orientations and perceptions of their teachers' communication styles. Language Learning, 51, 107-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00149

Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 1-20.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00001

Plonsky, L., & Mills, S.V. (2006). An exploratory study of differing perceptions of error correction between a teacher and students: Bridging the gap. Northern Arizona University Applied Language Learning, 16, 55–77.

Raimes, A. (1991). Errors: Windows into the mind. College ESL, 1(2), 55-64.

Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87-111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586356

Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortseed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586390

Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of writen feedback on an l2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039

Saeb, F. (2014). The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback on the Grammatical Accuracy of Beginner EFL Learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature 3, 22-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.22

Saeb, F., Nejadansari, D., & Khazaei, A. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Effects of Recasts and Scaffolded Feedback on the Grammatical Accuracy of Elementary EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6, 1420-1428.

http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607.13

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70.

Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343-364.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Columbia. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107

Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195-202.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x

Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 203–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990507

Terrell, T. D. (1977). A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning. The Modern Language Journal, 61, 325-337.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1977.tb05147.x & http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/324551

Truscott, J. (1999). What's wrong with oral grammar correction? Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437

Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 69-84.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00053

Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers' choice and learners' preference of corrective-feedback types. Language Awareness 17.1, 78–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/la429.0




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.32

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.