The Effect of Vocabulary Cluster on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Achievement

Masoud KhaliliSabet, Mitra Mousazadeh Sayyadmahaleh

Abstract


This study intended to inspect the possible effects of vocabulary cluster on Iranian Intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary achievement. It was based on the comparison between semantically and thematically –related sets to find out which type of vocabulary learning cluster was more effective on learners vocabulary learning. Sixty intermediate EFL learners were selected based on their performance on OPT test and then were randomly assigned into three groups each containing 20 subjects (one control and two experimental groups). Quasi-experimental design was used in which Pre-test and post-test were administered to collect data. The researcher employed Nations word level test as the pre-test to examine the participants' initial knowledge of common words. The experimental group (A) worked on thematic clustering, while experimental group (B) received instruction on semantic clustering and the control group received placebo. Next, all participants took part in vocabulary size test to evaluate the vocabulary achievement of the participants. The scores obtained from pre-test and post-test were analyzed through running paired sample t-test, and one-way ANOVA. The results indicated that the experimental group (B) which received semantically related sets outperformed the control group & the experimental group (A) which received thematically related sets. This may have significant implications for language instructors, syllabus designers, and learners to make more advancement in vocabulary learning process through employing vocabulary cluster.


Keywords


Semantic clustering, Thematic clustering, Semantic field

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Jabri, S. (2005).The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on learning English vocabulary by Saudi

students. Retrieved May 7, 2011, from http://dspace.iup.edu/handle/2069/52.

Al-Jarf, R. (2007).Teaching vocabulary to EFL College students online. Retrieved March 22, 2010, from http://callej.org/journal/8-2/al-jarf.htmlChepyshko, R., & Truscott, J. (2009). Semantic category effects in L2 vocabulary learning: A MOGULperspective (Master’s thesis). Retrieved May 7,2011, from www.hss.nthu.edu.tw/~fl/thesis/tesol/945209.pdf .

Bolger,.&Zapata,G.(2011).Semantic categories. Language learning journals,61(1),614-646.

Bruton,A.,Lopez,M.G.,&Mesa,R.E.(2011).Incidental L2 vocabulary learning :an Impracticable Term? TESOL Quarterly,45, 759-768.

Decarrico, J.S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Erten,I.H.&Tekin,M.(2008)"Effects of vocabulary Acquisition of presenting new words in semantic

sets versus semantically unrelated sets".System,36(3),407-22.

Fu, J. (2009). A study of learning styles, teaching styles and vocabulary teaching strategies in Chinese primary school. Kristianstad University College: Sweden.

Finkbeiner,M.,&Nicole,J.L.(2003).Semantic category effects in L2 word learning.Applied psycholinguistics 24(3),369-383.

Graves,M.(2006).The vocabulary book: learning and instruction. New York: Teacher college press.

Gowdasiaei,F.(2005). An attribute-treatment interaction study: lexical-set versus semantically- unrelated vocabulary instruction. RELC journal , 36,341-361.

Gairns,R,&Redman,S.(1986).working with words.Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.

Hashemi,M.R.,&Gowdasiaei, F.(2005).An attribute-treatment interaction study :Lexical-set versus semantically-unrelated vocabulary instruction.RELC Journal,36,341-361.

Hippner-Page, T. (2000).Semantic clustering versus thematic clustering of English vocabulary words for second language instruction: Which method is more effective? Retrieved May 7, 2011, from

www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED445550.

Luke, S. D. (2006). The power of strategy instruction. Evidence for Education, 1 (1). Retrieved from nichcy.org/research/ee/learning-strategies.

Lynch,T.(1996).Communication in the language classroom.Oxford:Oxford university press.

Richards,J.c.&Rodgers.T.S.(2001).Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge university press.

Seal,B.D.(1991).Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M.Celce-Murcia(Ed.),teaching English as a second or foreign language .(2nd ed.,pp.296-311).Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Smith,Vicki L.(1983).Vocabulary building for university-bound ESL students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 230037.

Tagashira, K., Kida, S., & Hoshino, Y. (2010). Hot or gelid? The influence of L1 translation familiarity on the influence effects in foreign language vocabulary learning. System, 38, 412-421, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.03.015.

Thomas,b.J.(1986). Intermediate vocabulary book. England Longman group limited.

Tinkham,T.N.(1994).The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary.unpublished doctoral dissertation.University of Illinois ,Urbana.

Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second

language vocabulary. Second language research, 13(2), 138-163.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.209

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.