Promoting Teacher Professional Development: the Role of Individual and Contextual Factors

Zahra Rastegar Haghighi Shirazi, Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri, Firooz Sadighi, Lotfollah Yarmohammadi

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to investigate the individual and contextual factors conducive to teacher professional development. The study which aimed at identifying the predictors of teacher development consisted of in-depth interviews with 15 teachers. Data gleaned from in-depth interviews were analyzed utilizing content analysis. Some common themes that emerged from the qualitative data included (a) learning goal orientation (b) teacher self-efficacy, (c) professional commitment (d) organizational climate, and (e) learning organization culture.  Theoretical and practical implications of the study are discussed.

 


Keywords


Teacher professional development, Learning goal orientation, Teacher self-efficacy, Professional commitment, Organizational climate, Learning organization culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationships between efficacy and the instructional practices of teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman Company.

Brett, J. F., & VandeWalle, D. (1999). Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (6), 863–873.

Bryk, A., Camburn, E. & Louis, K.S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781.

Burdett, J.O. (1991). What is Empowerment Anyway? Journal of European Industrial Training, 15 (6), 23–30.

Burns, T. (2013). Teachers' perceptions of fairness and equity are essential to a successful principalship. NASSP Principal Leadership, 13 (7), 42-45.

Clement, M. & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers' professional development: a solitary or collegial (ad)venture? Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 81-101.

Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 51 (3), 279-310.

Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. (2006). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daal , T. V. , Donche, V. & De Maeyer, S. (2013). The Impact of Personality, Goal Orientation and Self-Efficacy on Participation of High School Teachers in Learning Activities in the Workplace. Vocations and Learning, 1-20.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: The power of bottom over the top. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 233–241.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development. Educational Leadership, 53 (6), 4-10.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55 (5), 6–11.

Darling-Hammond L. & McLaughlin M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76 (8), 597-604.

Day, C. & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the Conditions for Teachers' Professional Learning and Development: Sustaining Commitment and Effectiveness over a Career. Oxford Review of Education, 33 (4), 423-443.

Eden, D., & Kinnar, J. (1991). Modeling Galatea: Boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 773–780.

Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.

Evans, L. (1998). Teacher morale, job satisfaction and motivation. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Limited.

Flick, U. (2005). An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Foley, J. R. & Clifton, R. A. .(1990). Locus of control, organizational climate, and participation in staff development: A study of college instructors. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, XX-2 , 45-59.

Foster, A. (2004). A nonlinear model of information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55 (3), 228-237.

Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: probing the depths of educational reform. London, New York, Philadelphia: The Falmer Press. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 915-945.

Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Stoel, R. & Kruger, M. (2009). The Effect of Teacher Psychological, School Organizational and Leadership Factors on Teachers’ Professional Learning in Dutch Schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109 (4), 406-427.

Guskey, T. (2002). Does it make a difference: Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59, 45-51.

Guskey, T.R. & Passaro, P.D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.

Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D. & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 2, 280-293.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277-1288.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1995). The leadership challenge: how to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. California: Jossey-Bass.

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K. & Salas, E. ( 1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.

Lam, Y.L.J. & Pang, S.K.N. (2003). The relative effects of environmental, internal and contextual factors on organizational learning: the case of Hong Kong schools under reforms. The Learning Organisation, 10 (2), 83-97.

Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76 (8), 591-596.

Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1984). Teachers, their world and their work: Implications for school improvement. Alexandria,VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23 (2), 175–182.

Louis, K., Kruse, S., & Marks, H. M. (1996). School wide professional community. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179-204). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McNabb, D. E. (2007). Knowledge management in the public sector: A blueprint for innovation in government. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Hoyle, R.H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.

Newmann, F.M., Rutter, R.A., & Smith, M.S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62, 221-238.

Oti, A. O. (2012). Organizational climate predictors of female academics’ career growth and leadership position. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved

Pajeres, F. (2002 ). Overview of social cognitive theory and self efficacy. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html

Park, S. ( 2011). The impact of organizational learning culture, goal orientation, managerial effectiveness, and psychological empowerment on employees' workplace learning, University of Minnesota, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations ( 3465136).

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Porter, Ch, O. L ( 2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up Behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (4), 811–818.

Pugach, M. C, & Johnson, L. J. (2002). Unlocking expertise among classroom teachers through structured dialogue: Extending research on peer collaboration. Exceptional Children, 62, 101-110.

Rhoton, J., & Stiles, K. E. (2002) Exploring the professional development design process: Bringing an abstract framework into practice. Science Educator, 11( 1), 1-8.

Rogers, D., & Babinski, L. (2002). From isolation toconversation: Supporting new teachers' development. Al- bany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. Elementary School Journal, 89, 421-439.

Schamber, L. (2000). Time-line interviews and inductive content analysis: Their effectiveness for exploring cognitive behaviors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51( 8) 734-744.

Seidler, J. (1974). On using informants: a technique for col¬lecting quantitative data and controlling measurement er¬ror in organization analysis. American Sociological Re¬view 39, 816-831.

Tsafos, V., & Katsarou, E. (2000). Action research in the professional development of teachers. Contemporary Education, 114, 67–74

Wu, M & Chen, Ch. (2012). Obstacles of organizational learning and self-transcendence: theoretical research based on Chinese family business. Asian Social Science, 8 , 13, 89-94.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.