Methods for Maximizing Graduate Students’ Learning Experience: An Insider’s Perspective

Habsah Hussin

Abstract


Graduate students furthering their studies at Master level are mature adult learners who bring with them a myriad of educational backgrounds and professional experiences into their studies.  Delivering knowledge and information to them the traditional way via the lecture method per se may not be very effective anymore.  They need methods that can utilize and make relevant their existing knowledge and professional experiences to help them realize their full potentials.  This paper discusses the incorporation of four methods (individual presentation, dialogue, article critiquing and forum) into a graduate-level course (ESL Methodology) to supplement the lecture method, to provide variation in methods of teaching graduate students and as alternative measures for these graduate students to maximize their learning experience.


Keywords


Learning experience, professional experience, graduate students, individual presentation, dialogue, article critiquing, forum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bress, P. (2010). Teamwork. English Teaching Professional. 67, 48.

Doran, S. (2009). They talk more, you talk less. English Teaching Professional. 64, 12-14.

Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of students’ learning. Bristol Technical Educational Services.

Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (2003). Looking in the classrooms. (9th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching. (8th ed.). New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.

Kincheloe, J. L., Slattery, P. & Steinberg, S. R. (2000). Contextualizing teaching. London: Addison-Wesley Longman Inc.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.

Lasley, T. J. & Matscynski, T. J. (1997). Strategies for teaching in a diverse society. Wadsworth publishing Company.

Orel, T. (2011). A delicate balance. English Teaching Professional. 73, 54-55.

Ornstein, A. C. (1990). Strategies for effective teaching. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Beyond methods. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.) English Language Teaching in its Social Context: A Reader. (pp. 167-179). Oxford UK: Routledge.

SCL. (2011). Student Centred Learning – Universiti Putra Malaysia. UPM: Centre for Academic Development (CADe).

Senior, R. (2009a.). Class-centred teaching. English Teaching Professional. 65, 8-10.

Senior, R. (2009b.). Let’s get engaged. English Teaching Professional. 65, 63.

Woodward, T. (1996). ‘Paradigm shift and the language teaching profession.’ In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.) Challenges and Change in Language Teaching. (pp. 4-9). Oxford UK: Heinenmann.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.