Explicit or Implicit Instruction of Metadiscourse Markers and Writing Skill Improvement

Ahmad Yaghoubi, Somayeh Ardestani

Abstract


The current study is an attempt to investigate the explicit or the implicit instruction of metadiscourse markers and the writing skill improvement. The participants of the study (N = 90) were female Iranian students at Kish Institute of Science and Technology. Two experimental groups were defined in this study: experimental group “A” which received the explicit instruction of metadiscourse markers and experimental group “B” which were taught implicitly based on Hyland’s (2005) classification of metadiscourse markers. Two instruments were employed in the study: a pretest and a posttest. To elicit the pertinent data, the participants were given a pretest of writing ability to investigate if the learners had knowledge regarding the correct application of ‎metadiscourse markers in their writing. After 8-session treatment, a posttest was administered to compare the participants’ performance in use of matediscourse markers. The findings of the present study indicated that there was a significant difference in the participants’ pretest and posttest writing scores with regard to the application of metadiscourse markers. The findings revealed that metadiscourse instruction had a positive effect on the learners’ writing. In addition, the results showed that both the explicit and the implicit instruction of metadiscourse markers significantly improved participants’ writing ability.

 


Keywords


Explicit instruction, Implicit instruction, Metadiscourse markers, Writing skill

Full Text:

PDF

References


Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (3rd ed). United States of America: Pearson Education Inc.

Chen Ch. W. (2006). The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11 (1), 113-130.

Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. (1996). Metadiscourse: A technique in improving ‎students writing. Research in the Teaching of English.‎ 30 (2), 149-81.

Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of social studies textbooks: Metadiscourse. Journal ‎of Curriculum Studies, 16 (3), 279-296.‎

Crismore, A. (1985). Metadiscourse in social studies texts. Technical report, 366, ‎‎155-179‎

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New ‎York: Peter Lang.‎

Crismore, A., Msarkkanen R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive ‎writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. ‎Written Communication, 10, 39-71.‎

Dastjerdi, H. V., & Shirzad, M. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction of ‎metadiscourse markers on ‎EFL learners' writing performance. The Journal of ‎Teaching Language Skills, 2 (2), 155- 174.‎

Farhadi, H., Jafarpoor, A., & Birjandi, P. (1994). Language skills testing: From theory ‎to practice. Tehran, Iran: SAMT.‎

Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., Velasco-sacristan, M., Arribas-Bano, A., & Samaniego-Fernandez, E. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1291-1307.

Fung, L. (2011). Discourse markers in the ESL classroom: A survey of teachers’ attitudes. The Asian ‎EFL Journal Quarterly, 13 (2), 199-248.‎

Henry, F. & Tator, C. (2000). Discourses of Domination: Racial bias in the Canadian English language press. London: University of Toronto Press.

Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic ‎metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437.

Hyland, K. (2000). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory textbooks. ‎English for Specific ‎Purposes, 18, 3-26.‎

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman: ‎Pearson.‎

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: ‎Continuum.‎

Martinez, A. C. L. (2004). Discourse markers in the expository writing of Spanish university students. IBERICA, 8, 63-80.

Rezvani, S. A., Abdullah, A., & Baki, R. (2012). Constructing an organized and coherent text: How ‎discourse markers are viewed by Iranian post-graduate students? International Journal of ‎Humanities and Social Science, 2 (9), 196-209.

Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-talk: Organisational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction, 50, 199-236.

Taghizade, M. & Tajabadi, F. (2013). Metadiscourse in Essay Writing: An EFL Case. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. 4 (7), 1658-1662.

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College ‎Composition Communication, ‎1 (36), 82-93.‎

Williams, J. (2007). Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace, (9th ed). New York: Pearson-Longman.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.4p.14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.