Relationships Between Metacognitive Strategies and Characteristics of Professional Tour Guide Trainees in English for Tourism

Malinee Phaiboonnugulkij

Abstract


The objectives of this study are to investigate and compare the total and individual metacognitive strategies used by professional tour guides in four English for Domestic Tourism lessons, and to explore the relationships between the use of metacognitive strategies in these lessons and characteristics of professional tour guide trainees. A total of eighteen professional tour guide trainees participated in this study and they were classified into groups from their proficiency levels in English, duration in English language study and the level of responsibility of their current jobs. The research instruments were a metacognitive strategy questionnaire, strategy coding scheme, English for Domestic Tourism lessons and English for Domestic speaking test and rating scale. Chi-square, One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), frequency, means, standard deviations and the qualitative content analysis from the questionnaires and coding scheme were used in the data analysis. The results show no significant differences in the use of both the total and individual metacognitive strategies in four lessons. However, there are significant relationships at the.05 level between proficiency level and goal setting and control of linguistic execution strategies. There are also significant relationships between duration of English language study and planning strategies and control of linguistic execution. The substantive insights from a qualitative content analysis show the prominent ways of how characteristics affect the strategy use of particular groups which should be included in both teacher and students’ training on how to make use of these higher order thinking to effectively teach and learn English language.

Keywords


Characteristics, Metacognitive Strategies, Speaking Ability, English for Tourism, Tour Guides, English proficiency Levels, English Language Studies, English for Specific Purposes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bozorgian, H., and Alamdari, E. F. (2018). Multimedia listening comprehension: Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL, 30(1), 131-152.

Deneme, S. (2008). Language learning strategy preferences of Turkish students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2),83-93.

Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Khamkhien, A. (2010). Factors affecting language learning strategy reported usage by Thai and Vietnamese EFL learners. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 7, 1: 66-85.

Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first-year students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(19), 1853-1858.

Lam, W.Y.K. (2010). Implementing communication strategy instruction in the ESL oral classroom: What do low-proficiency learners tell us? TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 11-30.

Liu, Y., and Feng H. (2011). An empirical study on the relationship between metacognitive strategies and online-learning behavior & test achievements. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,2(1),183-187. [Online] Available: http://dx.doi.org/11.5679/elt.v7n6g7h13 (May 22, 2015)

Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Learning Styles & Strategies/Oxford, GALA, 1-25.

Phaiboonnugulkij, M. and Prapphal, K. (2013). Online speaking strategy assessment for improving speaking ability in the area of language for specific purposes: The case of tourism. English Language Teaching,6(9),19-29.

Phaiboonnugulkij, M. (2015). Insights into InConMedt: A practical guideline. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH), 23(4), 1179 – 1192.

Phaiboonnugulkij, M. (2016). Tap into Students’ Metacognitive Strategies Report via the Internet-Mediated Contextualized English for Domestic Tourism Lessons (InConMedt). International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(2), 171-182.

Pitenoee, M. R., Modaberi, A., and Ardestani, E. M. (2017). The Effect of Cognitive and Metacognitive Writing Strategies on Content of the Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 594-600.

Radwan, A. A. (2011). Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by university students majoring in English. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly March 2011, 13(1).

Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M., and Salahshour, N. (2013). The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 634-643.

Zhou, Z. (2018). On the Relationship of Students' English Learning Beliefs and Learning Strategy in the University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 175-180.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.87

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.