Effectiveness of E-learning for the Teaching of English: A Study of Comparative Strategies

Intakhab Alam Khan

Abstract


Teaching of English in Saudi Arabia (KSA) is on top priority these days. Linguists, researchers, pedagogues and teachers have different perceptions and views regarding the approaches/methods/techniques of teaching of English in EFL/ESL classrooms. In today’s modern learning scenario, it is believed that appropriate utilization of sophisticated tools of e-learning has generally been recommended in order to yield best possible results in a given situation. It is found that many students are found indifferent towards learning the target language (English). Different reasons are attributed to this situation. However, in order to overcome learning difficulties and motivate the concerned learners it is suggested that the students should be well involved in the teaching/learning activities. Online resources in particular can catch the attention of even a passive learner. While ascertaining the effectiveness of e-learning in general, the following aspects were also taken into account: relevance of e-learning, utilization of e-resource, e-training for the teachers etc. The effectiveness has been measured on account of the observation, responses of the questionnaires, experiment on the sample. The findings of the study are hopefully going to be effective and useful in the current practice of teaching English.

Keywords: Teaching, E-learning, online learning, pedagogues, linguists, resource utilization, e-training


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barbarick, K. A. (2010). Crossword Puzzles as Learning Tools in Introductory Soil Science. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 39: 1: 145-149

Chandra, V., & Lloyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1087-1098.

Condie, R., & Livingstone, K. (2007). Blending online learning with traditional approaches: Changing practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 337-348.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi. Kindle Edition. Technology, 29(2).

Dewey, J. (1899). Three years of the university elementary school. In J. Boydston (Ed.) John Dewey: The middle works, 1899 – 1924, Vol. 1: 1899-1901. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press

Gilbert, J., Morton, S., & Rowley, J. (2007). Learning: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 560-573.

Harlow, A., Cowie, B., & Jones, A. (2008). Will the teacher’s lap transform learning? Computers in New Zealand Schools, July 2008, pp. 51-59.

Istifci, I. & Kaya, Z. (2011). Collaborative Learning in Teaching a Second Language through the Internet.

Paper presented at 2nd International Conference Issues of State Language Teaching: Problems and Challenges. Batumi, Georgia, July 14-15, 2011.

Jimoyiannis, A.,Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., and Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy , Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2).

Khan, Intakhab A. (2011) Challenges of Teaching/Learning English and Management. GJHSS, 11(8).

Khan, Intakhab A. (2014) Effectiveness of Blended Learning for Teaching of English: An Exploratory Study, Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 3(3), 78-85

Klassen, J., & Milton, P. (1999). Enhancing English language skills using multimedia: Tried and tested. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(4), 281-294.

Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435

Liu, T. Y. & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous game in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55, 630-643

Nuray, G, Ercan, K. and Ozden, M.Y. (2013). Design of a blended learning environment: Considerations and implementation issues. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 13.

Oblinger, D. (2006). Simulation, Games and Learning (http://mobilelearningcourse.pbworks.com).

Oxford, R. L. & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291 -300

Parr, J., & Fung, I. (2000). A review of the literature on computer-assisted learning, particularly integrated learning systems, and outcomes with respect to literacy and numeracy. Final report. (Report to the Ministry of Education). Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. In MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426

Shah, S., Lynch, L. Z., & Macias-Moriarity, L. (2010).Crossword Puzzles as a Tool to Enhance Learning About Anti-Ulcer Agents. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 10, 74(7),

Sosabowski M., Herson K. & Lloyd A. (1998). Enhancing learning and teaching quality: integration of networked learning technologies into undergraduate modules. ActiveLearning, 8, 20-25

Whisenand, T. G., & Dunphy, S. M. (2010). Accelerating Student Learning of Technology Terms The Crossword Puzzle Exercise. Journal of Information Systems Education, 141-148.

Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers' perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311-333.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.