Indonesian EFL Students’ Perspective on Writing Process: A Pilot Study

Imelda Hermilinda Abas, Noor Hashima Abd Aziz

Abstract


The study was aimed at understanding the EFL Indonesian students’ perspective on the writing process. The pilot study involved two male Indonesian postgraduate students in Universiti Utara Malaysia. The Indonesian students were selected based on the following criteria: (1) had enough knowledge in English writing, indicated by the completion of Academic Writing and Research Methodology courses taken in UUM; (2) had written an unpublished thesis during their undergraduate studies in Indonesia and they are writing their master or doctoral thesis in English; (3) used English extensively in writing their assignments, and in daily activities. Pseudonyms were used to refer to the participants as Sukarno and Suharto. The data were collected through in-depth interviews with the participants. The interview sessions took approximately 15-20 minutes for each participant and were videotaped and audiotaped. Semi-structured interview with 15 questions and probes were used. The results showed that the two participants had positive feelings and attitudes towards writing in English. Although they had a hard time in English writing during their undergraduate in Indonesia, they become fond of writing in English in their postgraduate time due to the exposure to English extensively. In composing, they used brainstorming, drafting, pausing, revising and editing in a recursive manner.

Keywords: in-depth interview, pilot study, writing process, English as a Foreign Language (EFL)


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhosani, N.M. (2008). Utilizing the writing process approach with English as a second language writers: A case study of five fifth grade of ESL Arab students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis. (3341499).

Angelova, M. (1999). An Exploratory Study of Factors Affecting the Process and Product of Writing in English as a Foreign Language. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York.

Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing learners’ academic writing skills in higher education: A study for educational reform. Language & Education, 16(3), 161-177. DOI: 10.1080/09500780208666826

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bjork, L., & Raisanen, C. (1997). Academic writing: A university writing course. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational psychologist, 35(1), 25-37. DOI: 10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4

Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Thirteen. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research method in education. UK: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boston, M.A : Pearson Education Inc.

Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387. DOI: 10.2307/356600

Hamman, L. (2005). Self-regulation in academic writing tasks. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 15-26. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE14.pdf

Herrington, A. J. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 331-361. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171066

Ignatius, H. (1999). English academic writing features by Indonesian learners of English (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Graduate Program of State University of Malang, Indonesia.

Imtiaz, S. (2003). Cognitive processes in writing: Exploring the strategies used by second and foreign language learners of English [monograph]. Language in India, 3 (4 April, 2003). Retrieved from http:// languageinindia.com /april2003/cognitivewriting.html

Johannesen, L.R. (2001). Teaching thinking and writing for a new century. English Journal, 90, 38-46. DOI: 10.2307/822054

Kharma, N., & Hajjaj, A. (1997). Errors in English among Arabic speaker. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.

Krashen, S.D. (1994). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory. In Bilingual Education Office (Ed.) Schooling and language-minority students: A theoretical framework (2nd ed., pp. 47-75). Los Angeles, CA: California State University. Evaluation Dissemination and Assessment Center.

Latief, M. A. (1990). Assessment of English writing skills for students of English as a foreign language at the Institute of Teacher Training and Education IKIP Malang, Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa). Retrieved from: ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis.

McCharthy, M. (1992). Discourse analysis for language teacher. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Mistar, J., Zuhairi, A., and Parlindungan, F. (2014). Strategies of learning English writing skill by Indonesian senior high school students. Arab World English Journal, Vol. 5(1), 290-303. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/95382057

Peng, G. (2011). On the effectiveness of writing strategies in promoting 13-15 years old Chinese ESL learners' writing ability (Doctoral dissertation). Kristianstad University, Sweden.

Rababah, G. (2003). Communication problems facing Arab learners of English: A personal perspective. TEFL Web Journal, 2(1), 15-30. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED473079.pdf

Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents/Prentice Hall.

Sadik, A. (2009). Cognitive and metacognitive writing strategies and their relations to writing performance of EFL learners (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar, Indonesia.

Setyono, B. (2014). Approaches in teaching writing designed by high school English teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, Vol. 14(1), 477-494. Retrieved from http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied

Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23). Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sulistyaningsih. (1997). A descriptive study on rhetoric in students' expository essay (Unpublished Master thesis). State University of Malang, Indonesia.

Zamel, V. (1976). Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: What we can learn from research in the teaching of English. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 67-76. DOI: 10.2307/3585940

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195-209. DOI: 10.2307/3586792


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.