Syntactic Dependencies and Verbal Inflection: Complementisers and Verbal Forms in Standard Arabic

Feras Saeed


This paper investigates the syntactic dependency between complementisers and verbal forms in Standard Arabic and provides a new analysis of this dependency. The imperfective verb in this language surfaces with three different forms, where each form is indicated by a different suffixal marker attached to the end of the verb as (-u), (-a), or (-Ø). The occurrence of each suffixal marker on the verb corresponds to the co-occurrence of a particular type of Comp-elements in the C/T domain. I argue that these morphological markers on the three verbal forms are the manifestation of an Agree relation between an interpretable unvalued finiteness feature [Fin] on C and an uninterpretable but valued instance of the same feature on v, assuming feature transfer and feature sharing between C/T and v (Pesetsky & Torrego 2007; Chomsky 2008). I also argue that the different verbal forms in Standard Arabic are dictated by the co-occurrence of three types of Comp-elements: i) C-elements; ii) T-elements which ultimately move to C; and iii) imperative/negative elements.

Keywords: feature transfer/sharing, verbal forms, complementisers, finiteness, syntactic dependency, Standard Arabic

Full Text:



Al-Balushi, R. (2011). Case in Standard Arabic: The Untraveled Paths. PhD thesis. University of Toronto.

Biberauer, T. & Roberts, I. (2010). Subjects, Tense and Verb-Movement. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, pp. 263-303. Cambridge: CUP.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pp. 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gartner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics, pp. 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In C. Otero et al. (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, pp. 134–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Fassi Fehri, A. (2012). Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gallego, A. J. (2010). Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Haywood, J. A. & Nahmad, H. M. (1962). A New Arabic Grammar of the Written Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ouali, H. (2008). On C-to-T ϕ-feature transfer. In R. D’Alessandro et al. (eds.), Agreement Restrictions, pp. 159–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E. (2001). T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pp. 355–426. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In S. Karimi et al. (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture. Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation, pp. 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Platzack, C. (2013). Head movement as a phonological operation. In Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing Syntax, pp. 21–43. Oxford: OUP.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, pp. 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Ryding, K.C. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.