Improving Undergraduates’ Argumentative Group Essay Writing through Self-assessment

Yong Mei Fung, Hooi Chee Mei

Abstract


When writing an argumentative essay, writers develop and evaluate arguments to embody, initiate, or simulate various kinds of interpersonal and textual interaction for reader consideration (Wu & Allison, 2003). This is quite challenging for English as a second language (ESL) learners. To improve the quality of their writing, students need to review their draft throughout the writing process. This study aimed to investigate the effect of self-assessment in group writing and how group work improves students’ writing ability. An intact class comprising 22 first-year undergraduates participated in the study.  Data were collected from pre- and post-treatment writing tests, semi-structured interview and reflection entries. The results revealed that self-assessment has a significant effect on students’ writing performance. Group work also enhanced social and cognitive development of the students. This study provides insights into the use of self-assessment in writing class to develop learner autonomy and improve writing ability.

Keywords: Argumentative essay, Self-assessment, Learner autonomy, Group writing, ESL learners 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bardine, F., & Fulton, P. (2008). Analyzing the benefits of revision memos during the writing and revision process. The Clearing House, 81(4), 149-54.

Butler, J. A., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Investigating instruction for improving revision of argumentative essays. Written Communication, 28(1), 70–96.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3th ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Cheng, F., & Chen, Y. (2009). Taiwanese argumentation skills: Contrastive rhetoric perspective. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1(1), 23-50.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hubert, J. (2010). Collaborative learning and self-assessment through reflective writing. The International Journal of Learning, 17(5), 385-398.

Jacobs, H., Zingraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

Khodadady, E., & Khodabakhshzade, H. (2012). The effect of portfolio and self-assessment on writing ability and autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 518-524.

Lam, R. (2010). The role of self-assessment in students’ writing portfolios: A classroom investigation. TESL Reporter, 43(2), 16-34.

Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nielsen, K. (2012). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: a conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 1-16.

Nimehchisalem, V., Yoong, D. S. C., Kaur, S. J. S., Siti Zaidah, Z., Norouzi, S., & Sheren, K. (2014). A self-assessment checklist for undergraduate students’ argumentative writing. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 2203-4714.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.

Vickers, C., & Ene, E. (2006). Grammatical accuracy and learner autonomy in advanced writing. English Language Teaching Journal, 60(2), 109-116.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364-374.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.