Generic Structure of Discussion Sections in ESP Research Articles across International and Iranian Journals

Masoud Khalili Sabet, Maryam Kazempouri

Abstract


Reviewing literature reveals that identifying generic structure of research articles (RAs) in different fields of study, especially ESP, has received much attention. The major purpose behind such trends of research has been raising researchers' awareness of the common conventions in writing RAs. Along with this universal trend, a lot of genre studies have been done in Iranian context; however, it seems that ESP RAs have not been paid due attention yet. Hence this study aimed at investigating the generic structure of ESP RAs in international and Iranian journals. Applying Kanoksilapatham's (2007) model to the compiled corpus, it was found that contextualizing the study (Move 1) and consolidating results (Move 2) were the obligatory moves in Discussion section of ESP RAs across international and Iranian journals. Evaluation of the findings was a new step found in international Discussion sections but absent in Iranian ones. Related discussion of these findings prepares the researchers for publishing in international and Iranian ESP journals.

Keywords: ESP, Discussion section, Move, Step, Author presence, Generic structure


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre Analysis: An Investigation of the Discussion Sections of Applied Linguistics RAs. The Asian ESP Journal, 4 (1), 39-63.

Biria, R., & Tahririan, M. H. (1997). Communicative conventions in Discussion discourse. IJAL, 13(3), 1-11.

Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47-59.

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/ culture/ power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bhatia, V. K. (2001). Analyzing genre: some conceptual issues. In M. Hewings (Ed.), academic writing context (pp. 79-92). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Bonn, S., & Swales, J. M. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 93–108.

Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis in ESP. In M. Couthard (ED.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219-228). London: Routledge.

Dudley-Evans, A., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fallah, S. (2004). A contrastive genre analysis of results and discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles by native and non-native English speakers with respect to evaluative entities and ascribed values. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Teacher Training, Tehran, Iran.

Fallahi, M. M., & Erzi, M. (2003). Genre analysis in language teaching: An investigation of the structure of the Discussion section of language- teaching-journal articles. IJAL, 6(1), 69-81.

Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121-150.

Flowerdew, J., & Wan, A. (2009). The linguistic and the contextual in applied genre analysis: The case of the company audit report. English for Specific Purposes, 29(2), 78-93.

Hirano, E. (2009). RA Introductions in English for specific purposes: A comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 240–250.

Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of RA Discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337.

Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, A. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the Discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-122.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry RAs. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry RAs. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Studies in corpus linguistics, 28, (pp. 73–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2010). A Comparative Study of Introduction and Discussion sections of Sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics Research Articles. Journal of Applied Language Studies (JALS), 1 (2), 97-122.

Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2011). The Relationship between Rhetorical moves and Lexical Cohesion Patterns; the case of Introduction and Discussion sections of Local and International Research Articles. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53, 71-95.

Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre-based analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 111-123.

Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7.

Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141-156.

Shabani, M. B., & Tazik, K. (2014). Coxhead’s AWL across ESP and Asian EFL Journal Research Articles (RAs): A Corpus-Based Lexical Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1722 – 1728.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.