The Effect of T Assistance on Malaysian Rural L Writing Self-efficacy : A Case Study

efficacy in writing after assistance given by a teacher. The social cognitive theory and socio-cultural theory are used as the theoretical -efficacy. A case study approach is adopted where three learners and a teacher were chosen from a form four class through purposive sampling. ng self-efficacy is evaluated using a writing self-efficacy scale adapted from Bottomley, Henk and Melnick (1998) and also classroom observation. Wang and Pape (2007) categories were used as guidelines to analyze observation data in order to understand the -efficacy phenomena in their learning to write. Overall, this study places a heavy emphasis on the perceptions and actions of the selected form four learners and teacher through non-participant classroom observations, interviews with each learner and teacher. Introduction Writing is a highly complex and demanding task that requires a number of skills to be performed at the same time. It is a complex cognitive activity involving attention at multiple levels: thematic, paragraph, sentence texts rather than simply consume them and, writers often have minimal solitary nature of the activity, with no immediate feedback and the effort needed to persist in p.145). Although writing is teachable, the transformation of thought into written communication is a difficult activity that requires many other levels of complementary skills. doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.2n.1p.81


Introduction
Writing is a highly complex and demanding task that requires a number of skills to be performed at the same time.It is a complex cognitive activity involving attention at multiple levels: thematic, paragraph, sentence texts rather than simply consume them and, writers often have minimal solitary nature of the activity, with no immediate feedback and the effort needed to persist in p.145).Although writing is teachable, the transformation of thought into written communication is a difficult activity that requires many other levels of complementary skills.doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.2n.1p.81Some of the necessary skills contributing to the complexity of writing were described by Montague and Leavell (1994, as cited in Scott and Vitale, 2003, p.220) Writing requires coordination and integration of multiple processes, including planning, production, editing, and revision.Composing requires prior knowledge of topic, genre, conventions, and rules as well as the ability to access, use and organize that knowledge when writing.
Given the complexity of writing tasks, it is not surprising that learners experience a wide variety of writing skill deficits and are often overwhelmed by writing activities (Scott & Vitale, 2003).Scott and Vitale (2003) also identified tha In Malaysia, there has always been concern about the achievement in English of learners in Malaysian rural schools.The Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister at the time, Datuk Seri Najib Razak (Utusan Malaysia, April 16, 2008) expressed his worries towards the declining English achievement especially among rural learners since the results from two major examinations (PMR and SPM) showed a big gap between the rural and urban learners.Detailed analysis by the Malaysian Ministry of Education (2008) identified the writing section, which carried the great results (Utusan Malaysia, April 16, 2008).Chitravelu, Sithamparam and Teh Soo Choon (2005) also pointed out that writing is the skill most Malaysian learners are less proficient in and they do not know how to accomplish the written task in a satisfactory way.Year after year, examiners have expressed great dismay at the fact that after having learnt English for eleven years, Malaysian rural learners, in most cases, still fail to produce even a short paragraph of intelligible writing (Samuel & Zaitun Bakar, 2008).This is because writing is a complex task which involves many thinking skills, such as generating, organizing and expressing ideas.Due to the challenges in writing, Malaysian learners are reluctant to use the language, never try to communicate in English (Utusan Malaysia, April 16, 2008), and have lower self-efficacy in the English language as compared to their counterparts in the city (Rahil Mahyuddin, Habibah Elias, Loh Sau Cheong, Muhd Fauzi Muhamad, Nooreen Noordin & Maria Chong Abdullah, 2006).In addition, writing becomes even more difficult in Malaysian schools as in most places especially the rural areas, social interaction in English such as with teachers or peers are almost non-existent (Chitravelu, Sithamparam & Teh Soo Choon, 2005).
Given the problems faced by Malaysian rural learners in English writing, there is a need to -efficacy and skills.Rec roles have been given prominence in the Malaysian education field as this is the factor that poses a great influence on the development of learners, both intellectually and emotionally (Mok Soon Sang, 2008).Thus, in the area of writing, t -efficacy and skills.This relationship is illustrated in Figure 1 below.Figure 1 shows that a teacher needs to help learners to develop writing skills by giving by the learners efficacy).Effective assistance allows learners to believe that they can carry out the writing tasks, whereas negative comments or less assistance from the teacher reduces t self-efficacy (Rahil Mahyuddin, Habibah Elias, Loh Sau Cheong, Muhd Fauzi Muhamad, Nooreen Noordin & Maria Chong Abdullah, 2006).When the learners have high selfefficacy, they feel competent and confident, and they are more willing to persevere when confronting obstacles (Pajares & Valiante, 2008).As the learner works on his/her composition, it also gives him/her the impression of how capable he/she is in writing, and in writing also tells the teacher of the type and level of assistance the learners need when completing the task (Mok Soon Sang, 2008).
Based on the argument above, learners obviously need support from teachers in developing positive self-beliefs in writing and finally help in improving their writing skills.Self-belief, or -1997, pp.3).Self-

Physical Factor
Affective Factor: Self-efficacy perform at a certain level and affects choice of activities, effort, an Boscolo, 2008, p.148).From the social cognitive perspective, self-efficacy can affect how individuals behave, their thoughts and emotional reactions in achievement settings.By having -efficacy and as a result, -efficacious individuals are more willing to participate, to work harder, and persists longer in tasks and have less adverse reactions when encountering difficulties tha p.148).Researchers (Pajares & Johnson, 1995;Pajares, 2002aPajares, , 2002b;;Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2003;Schunk, 2003;Rahil Mahyuddin, Habibah Elias, Loh Sau Cheong, Muhd Fauzi Muhamad, Nooreen Noordin & Maria Chong Abdullah, 2006;Schunk & Zimmerman, 2007) who have investigated self-efficacy beliefs and essay writing agree that the two are related.Thus, the teacher needs to act proactively by assisting the learners emotionally and physically.It means that the teacher needs to be aware of how the learners feel or think; to motivate and encourage them.At the same time, the teacher needs to support the learning process by providing assistance in terms of materials, ideas, suitable approach and guidance in writing.
Socioimportant components in the writing process and contribute to the improvement of the writing self-efficacy and skills.Socio-cultural theory argues for viewing writing as a mode of social action, and not simply as a means of communication.This means that a writing activity is succeeded by an interactive and collaborative discourse in which mental activity is distributed and shared between the teacher and l processes are acquired on an intermental or social plane as the expert and novice jointly p.209).Overall, writing involves particular kinds of people institutions and cultures.Thus, by seeing writing as mediated means and a mode of social action, writing activities should be recognized as collaborative, involving divisions of labor and forms of co-authorship.These divis -to-face co-production of texts to the provision ce is important to ensure an effective cooperation.
The assistance provided by the teacher is represented by the concept of scaffolding proposed by Vygotsky (1978).In other words, it refers to the assistance and interactional support given by an adult in sensitively tuned to what the learner presently understands, getting him to concentrate on what he can/she can manage while the teacher fills in the parts that the learner canno (Smith, 1997, p.24).Accordingly, scaffolding provides a facilitating context which allows a writing task to be completed.As Donovan and Smolkin (2008) explained, judicious questioning and commenting about a piece of writing provides the scaffolding ideas to be further developed and clarified.In the end, the writer is better able to develop and clarify ideas without the same level of support.
lends a picture to teaching of writing that assistance in the form of interaction or conversation between the teacher (as a more capable individual) and the writers is important in molding their writing skills and confidence in pursuing the task.
-cognitive theory where a learner is seen as an active agent and needs to interact with his/her environment in order to develop his/her skills and confidence in writing.Both theories similarly propose the importance of reciprocal relationship between social environment and learners as the main factor in learning and development, and thus bringing a different perspective of teaching approach from traditional writing classroom.Based on both theoretical explanations on self-effic study development.In Malaysia, writing in English is part of the most important assessment in education, in which rural learners are facing a major problem.Based on this scenario, it is therefore pertinent to find out how teachers actually assist these rural learners and whether it Specifically, two research questions discussed in detail in this paper are: 1. How does the teacher assist rural area learners in teaching and learning of writing? 2.

Methodology
This study employs a case -efficacy.In this study, a teacher and three learners were chosen based on the writing self-efficacy scale adapted from Bottomley, Henk and Melnick (1998).
Data f -participant classroom observations and interviews with the teacher and learners which were conducted once a week for five months.Meanwhile, l -efficacy in writing was also observed once a week -efficacy phenomena in their learning to write.
prepared to show an interpretive description of their writing learning process which is associated with self-efficacy.
-efficacy beliefs can be classified into three categories: persistence in accomplishing language tasks, self-awareness of English proficiency, and willingness to engage in language These three categories used as the guidelines for this study.In addition, interviews were conducted writing self-efficacy.In order to ensure that the measure and categories used to analyze data from each observation and interview are reliable, the data were given to two raters for the purpose of inter-rater reliability.These two raters analyzed the categories and data reported between the two sets of rating over the coding of the items.According to Creswell (2008), inter-ing any bias that any one individual might reliability index was calculated using the Cohen Kappa measurement instead of just using percentage agreement.This is bec were analyzed and calculated using SPSS 14.0 to get the value of Kappa.

How does the teacher assist rural area learners in teaching and learning of writing?
Method 1: The teacher used MsWord to show and teach writing process to the learners.
During the lesson, the teacher prompted questions and did not give direct answers to the learners.She would not directly teach the format of the essay, but developed the idea for the writing first by discussing it with the learners.She would ask learners one by one and esponses.
For example, on 1 st July 2009, the teacher asked each learner to contribute ideas for the topic asked Haslina to continue and suggest one idea.Haslina s This can improve and achieve our lesson during study After plan it... the sentence did not fit into the paragraph.Other learners then suggested replacing it with We must plan on how to achieve our goal screen.
Method and then they were correcting their writing.She walked around the class and looked at how the learners corrected their essay.She would sit with certain learners and asked why they made the changes that they did.She also answered questions posed by the learners regarding the comments she gave for their writing.
For example, on 8 th July 2009, the learners were asked to correct their essays after the teacher explained the mistakes in general.While the learners were correcting mistakes, the teacher read her correction.Teacher pointed out that the sentence was incomplete as she used the word but not referring to any noun.Teacher explained that is an adjective, so there should be a noun after that.Farah said that she actually meant in English but or the short one.Farah said , a short one.The teacher asked the class to guess the word for give the answer.The teacher finally goatee Method 3: The teacher liked to ask the learners to work in small groups when composing an essay.She would limit 4 learners in a group and set a writing task.She would walk around the class many errors in their writing, she would sit down with the group and gave suggestions on how to improve their essay.Once the learners completed their essay, they would have to present their essay and from here, the teacher would explain to the class the mistakes that they did when writing the essay.
For example, on 29 th July 2009, the teacher asked the learners to form a group of four and try to complete the story she gave in about 100 words.The teacher monitored each group, and sebagai as checked their gra a s apo to show belonging.The teacher advised them to check again and said that the answer was wrong.After they finished, the learners wrote their story on a mahjong paper and presented it to the class. -efficacy?
oning and discussion during the writing process.Learner A showed a positive development in terms of confidence in writing where she became more confident to write when asked questions by the teacher.On the other hand, Learner B felt a bit uncomfortable to write and was not confident to pursue the task when the teacher kept checking and asking about her writing progress.
Similarly, Learner C also felt less confdent to write but only because she was embarrassed and afraid when the teacher asked questions or sat with her to discuss her writing in class.
The summary is illustrated below according to the specific categories by Wang and Pape (2007).encouraged her to write more, -In class, she became active when provoked with questions by teacher and she frequently raised her hand even though her answers were wrong or the teacher did not ask her to answer.Willingness to engage in language activities finishing tasks, -In class, when the answer and compared it with hers.She jotted down notes when other learner gave Self-awareness of English proficiency --From the interview, she admitted that she understood her mistakes more after discussing it with the teacher in class rather than working on her own or with friends.-She showed no interest in class, constantly day dreaming and she did not respond question.Instead she asked her friend to answer questions for her, -In the interview, she admitted that she did not feel comfortable and could not speak in English.Thus, it made her unconfident to write as she was quite lost when the teacher asked questions and did not know how to start writing.To her, writing and speaking are two different things.

Willingness to engage in language activities
-She asked friends for help to correct her mistakes and admitted never sought -In class, sh in group discussions.In the interview, she admitted she felt more confident to made her feel bashful to engage in the activity.Self-awareness of English proficiency sentence structure errors.Learner B however felt hers is average and could write well if in a group.-She became afraid and embarrassed when the teacher asked questions.She trembled and produced an unclear voice each time the teacher asked her questions, -She admitted in interview that she was very afraid if the teacher asked her anything and as a consequence she forgot all of her ideas, -She needed friends to help her give answers and only respond to the teacher if her friend checked her answers first.She admitted she felt confident if a friend looked at her answer first before responding to teacher.

Willingness to engage in language activities
rred to dictionary.In group discussions, she worked on her own when her group was quiet by translating her writing from working that way as she could write more.

Self-awareness of English proficiency
not translate her writing into English and that she was not good in English.She was quiet and lowered her head each time teacher commented on her work.-In the interview, she admitted that she could write more and feel more confident close to.

Conclusion
The findings show that the three learners were able to seek options and foster their own creativity to produce an effective piece of composition through discussion and questioning technique was found to be helpful in improving the quality of written drafts.Therefore, teachers should view themselves as facilitators in the writing tasks.They should provide help and assistance to the learners-writers to clarify their ideas in the process of writing.As indicated by the finding, the teacher not only helped the writers to clarify ideas but also to develop their ideas as well.The teacher helped to improve the composition by giving new ideas and different views on the topic.Besides that, the teacher also helped the writers to omit unnecessary statements.Thus, this implies that evaluators of the compositions should not be based only on grammatical and structural accuracy but the emphasis should also be given to the clarity of expressions and ideas as well.In addition, coherence, cohesion and good choice of words should also be parts of an effective composition.However, questioning techniques may have different effects on writers with low or average self-could boost the high self-efficacy writers to write more and expand their ideas, low and average self-efficacy writers might not experience the same changes.These writers may prefer to approach writing differently.Therefore, determining the level of assistance in teaching is very important.In other words, some writers may need more assistance than others.Working in groups is also probably suitable as it allows the learners of various language proficiency levels or skills to interact and exchange ideas with one another.Overall, research shows that teachers need to be aware of the kind of scaffolding that they need to provide for each writer who has a different level of writing selfthe task.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Inter-relationship of social and emotional factors with affective classroom management in the learning environment (Mok Soon Sang, 2008)