Online Teaching of Productive Language Skills (PLS) during Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) in EFL Classrooms: A Phenomenological Inquiry

Hüma Nayman, Bünyamin Bavlı

Abstract


This study aims to explore the experiences of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers in teaching productive skills during emergency distance learning (ERT) and the COVID-19 pandemic and their recommendations for teaching productive skills online. Phenomenological inquiry, which is one of the qualitative designs, was employed to conduct the study. It took place in the 2020-2021 academic year in Turkey. Participants of the study consisted of 16 English as a Foreign Language teachers. Convenience sampling was executed to designate the study participants. The main data collection tool was semi-structured interview questions and data was collected via individual interviews, a focus group interview and via form by e-mail. Content analysis was administered in the data analysis process. Study results explored teachers mostly agreed on the fact that online education had its advantages such as easy materials access and online tools and some disadvantages such as lack of interaction, lack of scaffolding, internet access problems and learner-related problems. Also, they stated that it was hard to engage learners during the process, so they used games, authentic materials, videos, discussions and web 2.0 tools to provide engagement. Teachers discovered new online platforms and tools to make their lessons efficient. They mostly suggested changing the assessment style, making participation compulsory and conducting activities that can engage learners in the learning-teaching process. Consequently, it was seen that teaching productive skills in ERT was challenging in terms of student participation; however, teachers found solutions to it and they thought it was not a bad idea to teach productive skills online, especially speaking. Accordingly, hybrid education can be considered in the future in teaching English and teaching productive skills.

Keywords


Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT), English as a Foreign Language (EFL), Teaching Speaking, Teaching Writing, Online Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alzamil, A. (2021). Teaching English speaking online versus face-to-face: Saudi students’ experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(1.2). doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.2

Astuti, M., & Solikhah, I. (2021). Teacher perception in teaching English for SMP in Klaten Regency during COVID-19 Outbreak. IJOTL-TL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.30957/ijotl-tl.v6i1.645.

Bachiri, H., & Oifaa, T. (2020, September). The role of ICT in the teaching of productive skills in English during COVID-19: teachers’ perceptions and obstacles. In Linguistic Forum-A Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 35-44.

Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.

Birsh, J. R., & Carreker, S. (2018). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes Pub.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Burns, A., & Siegel, J. (2018). International perspectives on teaching the four skills in ELT: Listening, speaking, reading, writing. Palgrave Macmillan.

Chowdhury, A. Z., & Zannat, M. M. (2021). Barriers to teaching English productive skills in online classroom: a study at the private universities in Bangladesh. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(12), 164-171. DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.12.19

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.) Sage.

Demirel, I. F., & Fakazli, Ö. (2021). A CEFR-based comparison of English and Turkish language teaching course books in terms of speaking and writing skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.851117

Demirel, Ö. (2014). Yabancı dil öğretimi (8th ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

Erarslan, A. (2021). English language teaching and learning during COVID-19: A global perspective on the first year. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(2), 349-367.

Gurbuz, C., & Cabaroglu, N. (2021). EFL students’ perceptions of oral presentations: Implications for motivation, language ability and speech anxiety. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 600-614.Doi: 10.52462/jlls.41

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. (3rd ed.). Longman.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education Limited.

Jong, B. (2021). Using padlet as a technological tool for assessment of students ‘writing skills in online classroom settings. International Journal of Education, 9(2), 411-423. DOI: 10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.411.423

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kusumawati, A. J. (2020). Redesigning face-to-face into online learning for speaking competence during COVID-19: ESP for higher education in Indonesia. International Journal of Language Education, 4(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.14745

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Lukas, B. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). ESL Teachers’ Challenges in Implementing E-learning during COVID-19. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.18

Mavis Sevim, O., & Dursun, F. (2021). Why can’t we do it as teachers?: English language teaching from the perspectives of secondary school teachers. Research in Pedagogy, 11(1), 63-84.

Mahyoob, M. (2020). Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4). doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23

Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.

McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

Merriam, B. S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Meşe, E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.

Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.

Neuman, W. L. (2017). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri nitel ve nicel yaklaşımlar cilt 2 [Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches] (9th ed.). (S. Özge, Trans.). Yayınodası Publishing.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.

Patel, M. F., & Jain, P.M. (2008). English language teaching. Sunrise Publishers & Distributors.

Payne, J. S. (2020). Developing L2 productive language skills online and the strategic use of instructional tools. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 243-249.DOI: 10.1111/flan.12457

Ploj Virtic, M., Dolenc, K., & Šorgo, A. (2021). Changes in Online Distance Learning Behaviour of University Students during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak, and Development of the Model of Forced Distance Online Learning Preferences. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 393-411. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.393

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching. Yale University Press.

Stevens, D., & McGuinn, N. (2004). The art of teaching elementary English: Innovative and creative approaches. Routledge.

Sundarwati, E., & Pahlevi, M. R. (2021). EFL teachers’ challenges and opportunities of emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: narrative inquiry. Language and Education Journal Undiksha, 4(2), 74-85.

Tekir, S. (2021). Dealing with Turkish EFL learners’ speaking anxiety: Turkish EFL learners’ speaking anxiety. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(3), 3424-3442.

Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. Continuum International Publishing Group.

University of Cambridge. (2011). Using the CEFR: Principles of good practice. Cambridge University Press.

Van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.

Watkins, P. (2017). Teaching and developing reading skills. Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.179

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.