A Conceptual Paper on Future Development of Literacy Theories and Language Learning among Contemporary Chinese College EFL Students

Huanan Su, Fengyi Ma

Abstract


This paper aims to further understand the future development of literacy theory and language learning in contemporary Chinese universities through the research on the current situation of EFL students’ literacy in Chinese universities and the teaching characteristics of contemporary Chinese teachers. In this study, literature analysis method, literature comparison analysis method, literature synthesis method and other analytical methods were used to obtain the results. Based on our results, the lack of literacy training is an extremely important reason for the defects of literacy skills of contemporary Chinese college EFL students in the process of language learning. The strengthening of literacy training is one of the key measures to improve the comprehensive level of literacy of contemporary Chinese college EFL students in the process of their language learning. Theoretically, the future development of literacy theories and language learning among contemporary Chinese college EFL students is bound to closely connect with the new theory of multiliteracies and critical literacy in literacy development and the multiliteracies teaching methodology in language learning. Practically, the new theory of multiliteracies puts forward a series of hypotheses for school literacy education to cope with the drastic changes facing the world today. At the same time, the critical literacy theory is rooted in critical education theory, focusing on the important role of literacy in the formation of individual human values. Besides, the multiliteracies teaching methodology in language learning explores how to change traditional teaching methods, effectively using multimedia resources, and cultivating language learners’ skills of multiliteracies.

Keywords


Literacy Theories, Future Development, Language Learning, Contemporary Chinese College EFL Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benesch, S. (2001). Critical pragmatism: A politics of L2 composition. In T. J. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.). On Second Language Writing (pp. 161-172). L. Erlbaum Associates.

Cai, J. (2017). Challenges and Subversions of the Concept of Foreign Language Teaching in Colleges and Universities: Taking the “University English Teaching Guide” as an Example. Foreign Language Teaching, 1, 6-10.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). The place of world Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57(4), 586-619.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2011). Understanding Critical Writing. In P. K. Matsuda, M. Cox, J. Jordan & C. Ortmeier-Hooper (Eds.). Second Language Writing in the Composition Classroom: A Critical Sourcebook (pp. 216-230). Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Cheng, X. (2013). New Literacy Theory and Its Manifestation in Literacy Teaching in American Primary and Secondary Schools. Foreign Language Teaching Theory and Practice, 1, 62-70.

Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and Globalization. Routledge.

Feng, D. (2017). Classroom Design Based on Multiliteracies Theory: Taking English Linguistics as an Example. Foreign Languages in China, 3, 55-63.

Fraiberg, S. & You, X. Y. (2012). A multilingual and multimodal framework for studying L2 writing. Journal of EFL Writing Teaching and Research, 1(1), 22-33.

Ge, J. & Luo, X. (2010). A New Perspective on Foreign Language Teaching in the Era of New Media---Multiliteracies Pedagogy. Foreign Language Circles, 5,13-19.

Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257-293.

Habermas, J. (2001). On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action. MIT Press.

Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold.

Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, Semantics and Language Education. Cambridge University Press.

Hu, Z. (2007). Multimodalization in the Research of Social Semiotics. Language Teaching and Research, 1, 1-10.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164.

Jin, Y. (2013). Construction of College English Course Evaluation System. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 5, 56-62.

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by Design Guide. Common Ground.

Kramsch, C. J. (1998).Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.

Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.

Mills, K. A. (2011). The Multiliteracies Classroom. Multilingual Matters.

Mushtaq, R., & Bruneau, C. (2019). Microfinance, financial inclusion and ICT: Implications for poverty and inequality. Technology in Society, 101154.doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101154

New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review, 1, 60-93.

Pennycook, A. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. Longman.

Sénéchal, M., & Lefevre, J. (2014). Continuity and change in the home literacy environment as predictors of growth in vocabulary and reading. Child Development, 85(4), 1552-1568. doi:10.1111/cdev.12222

Sheng, J. & Han, B. (2011). New Literacy Quality Research and English Classroom Teaching Analysis. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 261-272.

Street, B. (1984).Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Street, B. (1997). The Implications of the “New Literacy Studies” for Literacy Education. English in Education, 31(3), 45-59.

Toews, S., & Kurth, J. (2019). Inclusive literacy instruction: A call to action. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities, 44, 135-142. doi:10.1177/1540796919855373

Williams, P. (2016). Exploring the challenges of developing digital literacy in the context of special educational needs communities. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1-16.doi:10.11120/ital.2006.05010006

Yao, W. & Huang, F. (2012). Alienation and Reconstruction: The Relationship between Teachers and Students from the Perspective of Critical Pedagogy. Modern University Education, 6, 16-20.

Yu, C. (2016). Foreign Language Teaching Model Reform Based on the Cultivation of Innovative Foreign Language Talents. Foreign Languages Journal, 4, 147-150.

Zhang, D. (2010). A Preliminary Study on the Design and Modal Calling of Multi-modal Foreign Language Teaching. China Foreign Languages, 3, 48-54.

Zhang, D. & Liu, R. (2014). Research on the Teaching Design of the Cultivation of Foreign Language Multiliteracies Ability---Take the Design of Student Oral Report as an Example. China Foreign Languages, 3, 45-52.

Zhang, Y. (2011). An Empirical Study on the Multiliteracies Ability of English Majors. Foreign Language Circles, 1, 45-52.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.3p.102

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.