The Relationship between Personality Types and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies of Language Learners

Majid Ghyasi, Morteza Yazdani, Mohammad Amini Farsani


This study investigates the relationship between personality traits, as measured by the NEO Five Factor Inventory, and different learning strategies, measured by the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), that foreign language student may employ to help them learn the language.  A sample of 231 undergraduate students of English in Iran was administered the Inventory and the MSLQ.  This study is the first to connect learners’ personality traits with general learning strategies, which can be specifically applied to foreign language learning.  Analyzing the data using multiple regressions, the authors found that personality type was able to predict the tendency to use different learning strategies.  Specifically, students who scored high on “conscientiousness” were more likely to use all strategies, particularly managing time and study environment.  Students high on extraversion were more likely to use peer learning and help seeking strategies.  The authors conclude that language teachers could benefit from assessing their students’ personalities and matching strategies to their students’ tendencies.



Self-regulation; Personality; Five-Factor Inventory; Second language learning

Full Text:



Anthony R. A. (January 1, 2008). Dissertations Collection for University of Connecticut. Paper AAI3313263.

Bidjerano, T. & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81.

Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning. European Journal of Personality, 10, 377–404.

Boekaerts, M. (2002). Bringing about change in the classroom: Strengths and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach- EARLI Presidential Address, 2001. Learning and Instruction, 12, 589-604.

Boekaerts, M. & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New Jersey. Pearson Education. Longman

Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1999). The relations between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 129−140.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic achievement: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319−338.

Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T., Jr., & Piedmont, R. L. (2003). Multivariate assessment: NEO-PI-R profiles of Madeline G. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), Paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 262–280). New York: Guilford Press.

Courneya, K. S., & Hellsten, L. M. (1998). Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers, and preferences: An application of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 625-633.

Dienstbier, R. (1991). Perspectives on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21−49). New York: Plenum Press.

Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to the approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33–48.

Furnham, A., Christopher, A., Garwood, J., & Martin, G. (2007). Approaches to learning and the acquisition of general knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1563–1571.

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.). Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills: Sage.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.

Huang, S. C. (2008). Assessing motivation and learning strategies using the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in a foreign language learning context. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(4), 529-534.

Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Personality and Self-Regulation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation (pp.1-16). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell publication.

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807.

Little, B. R., Lecci, L., & Watkinson, B. (1992). Personality and personal projects: Linking Big Five and PAC unity of analysis. Journal of Personality, 60, 501–525.

Matthews, G. (1997). Extroversion, emotion, and achievement: A cognitive–adaptive model. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 339-442). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

McCrae, R. P. & John, O. P. (1992). An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.

McCrae, R. R., Jr., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5) 509-516.

McCrae, R. R. & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-Regulation and the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation (pp.145-168). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell publication.

McDonough, S. (1999). Learner strategies. Language Teaching, 32, 1-8.

Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for theory and practice in human resource management. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, 153-200.

Nakata, Y. (2010). Toward a Framework for Self-Regulated Language-Learning. TESL Canada journal, 27(2), 1-10.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.

Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.

Paris, S. G. & Winograd, P. (2003). The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.

Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5-15.

Pintrich, P. R & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia,T., McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53, 801-813.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.

Randi, J. (2009). I think I can: Developing children’s concept of themselves as self-regulated learners, The NERA Journal, 45 (1), 55-56.

Ross, S. R., Rausch, M. K., & Canada, K. E. (2003). Competition and cooperation in the five-factor model: Individual differences in achievement orientation. Journal of Psychology, 137, 323-337.

Schunk, D. H, & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. The Guilford Press: New York.

Schunk, D. H. (2005). Commentary on self-regulation in school contexts. Learning and Instruction, 15, 173-177.

Slaats, A., Van der Sanden, J., & Lodewijks, J. (1997, March). Relating personality characteristics and learning style factors to grades in vocational education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA.

Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304.

Tseng, W., Dornyei, Z., and Schmitt, N. (2006). ‘A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition’, Applied Linguistics, 27: 78–102.

Tupes, E. C , & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61-97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: U.S. Air Force.

Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientations in strategy use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 149−170.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.