Exploring the State of Unbalance within the Topical and Heterotopical Spaces at the Core of Story

Mahshad Jalalpourroodsari, Sarah Catherine Household Ilkhani

Abstract


This paper examines one of the ways in which narrativity as a complex concept is rooted in almost simple notions which support it at its basic levels. The discussion here would be devoted to the concept of the minimal story (récit minimal) which is defined as being part of the surface narrative syntax of every discourse in general and Ibsen’s A Doll’s House in particular. It will be seen how the play’s content signs are converted via the minimal story and how the supporting pillars of this discourse are grounded in elementary types of narrative programmes which cement the trajectory (Note 1) of meaning at its surface stratum. The basis of this research is the semiotic theory proposed by the French structuralist semiotician Algirdas Julien Greimas as the founder of Paris School of semiotics. It will be seen how the story can arrange itself from its end and how the whole narrative process may possess a temporal and syntactic orientation which forms the bare structure around which the whole story is weaved. This paper attempts to shed some light on the inner fluctuations at the heart of Ibsen’s play accommodating an orientational schema which the semioticians would call the nucleus of all narrative systems. Therefore, in this article, an introduction of the basic concepts will be followed by an analysis of the turbulences affecting the main figures/actants (Note 2) inhabiting the minimal story of Ibsen’s discourse.     

 


Keywords


Minimal Story, Permanence, Change, Correlated Contents, Temporal/Thematic Axis, Inversed/posited Content, Topical/Heterotopical Space

Full Text:

PDF

References


Works in English and French:

Adam, J. (1994). Le texte narratif. Paris: Nathan.

Arup, J. (1966). Narrative and Symbol in Ibsen. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 99-103). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Averill, J. (1988). About Greimas and the Nature of Meaning: Linguistics, Semiotics, and Discourse Theory by Ronald Schleifer. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 42 (4), 252-253.

Bentley, E. (1966). Ibsen, Pro and Con. In James Walter McFarlane. (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 11-18). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Bertrand, D. (2000). Précis de sémiotique littéraire. Paris: Edition Nathan HER.

Bouissac, P. (1998). Encyclopedia of Semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bressler, C. (2007). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Bronwen, M, & Felicitas, R. (1998). Key Terms in Semiotics. London: British Library Press.

Champagne, R. (1977, Feb.). About Maupassant la sémiotique du texte: exercices pratiques by Greimas. The French Review, 50 (3), 501-502.

Chandler, Daniel. (2002). Semiotics: The Basics. New York: Roultledge.

Cobley, P. (2007). The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics. New York: Routledge.

Courtés, J. (1976). Introduction a la sémiotique narrative et discursive. Paris: Hachette.

Courtés, J. (1991). Analyse sémiotique du discours: de l’énoncé à l’énonciation. Paris: Hachette Supérieur.

Davis, R. C. (1984, Dec.). About Sémantique structurale. MLN, 99 (5), 1211-1215.

Ellis-Fermor, U. (1966). Ibsen and Shakespeare as Dramatic Artists. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 89-98). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Graham, J. (1978, Winter). Semiotics and Semantics. Boundary, 2 (3), 591-598.

Greimas, A., & Joseph,C. (1993). Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette Livre.

Greimas, A. J. (1971, Dec.). Narrative Grammar: Units and Levels. (Philip Bodrock, Trans.). MLN, 86 (6), 793-806.

Greimas, A. J. (1976a, Spring). The Cognitive Dimension of Narrative Discourse. (Michael Rengstorf, Trans.). New Literary History, 7 (3), 433-447.

Greimas, A. J. (1976b). Maupassant la sémiotique du texte: exercices pratiques. Paris: Seuil Edition.

Greimas, A. J. (1977, Spring). Elements of a Narrative Grammar. (Catherine Porter, Trans.). Diacritics, 7 (1), 23-40.

Greimas, A. J. (1981). Eléments pour une théorie de l’interprétation du récit mythique. In Seuil (Ed.), Communications 8:Analyse structurale du récit (pp. 34-65). Paris: Seuil.

Greimas, A. J. (1983). Du sens II: Essais sémiotiques. Paris: Seuil.

Greimas, A. J. (1986). Sémantique structurale. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France.

Greimas, A. J. (1989a, Spring). The Veridiction Contract. (Frank Collins, & Paul Perron, Trans.). New Literary History, 20 (3), 651-660.

Greimas, A. J. (1989b, Spring). On Meaning. (Paul Perron, & Frank Collins, Trans.). New Literary History, 20 (3), 539 550.

Greimas, A. J. (1989c, Spring). On Narrativity. (Paul Perron, & Paul Riceur, & Frank Collins, Trans.). New Literary History, 20 (3), 551-562.

Haakonsen, D. (1966). Ibsen the Realist. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 70-82). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Harris, R. (1989, Nov.). About Greimas and the Nature of Meaning: Linguistics, Semiotics, and Discourse Theory by Ronald Schleifer. The Review of English Studies, 40 (160), 541-542.

Howells, W. D. (1906, Jul.). Henrik Ibsen. The North American Review, 183 (596), 1-14.

Ibsen, H. (1954). A Doll’s House. In William Archer (Ed.), Four Plays: A Doll’s House- The Wild Duck- Ghosts- The Master Builder (pp. 25-107). (William Archer, Trans.). London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.

Lechte, J. (1994). Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Postmodernity. New York: Routledge.

McFarlane, J. (1966). Revaluations of Ibsen. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 19-27). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Makaryk, I. (1993). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory: Approaches, Scholars, Terms. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Marker, F, & Lise-Lone Marker. (1989). Ibsen’s Lively Art: A Performance Study of the Major Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mencken, H. L. (1966). The Technical Quality of the Plays. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 7-10). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Meyer, M. (1971). Ibsen: A Biography. London: Cox and Wyman Ltd.

Mitchell, B. (1977, Summer). About Maupassant la sémiotique du texte: exercices pratiques. World Literature Today, 51 (3), 414.

Miller, A. (1966). The Real in Ibsen’s Realism. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 104-105). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Nef, Fredric. (1977, Spring). Introduction to the Reading of Greimas: Towards a Discursive Linguistics. Diacritics, 7(1), 18-22.

Noth, W. (1990). Handbook of Semiotics. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Peacock, R. (1966). Effects of Ibsen. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 106-110). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Perron, P. (1989, Spring). Introduction: A. J. Greimas. New Literary History, 20 (3), 523-538.

Ricoeur, P., Collins, F., & Perron, P. (1989, Spring). Greimas’s Narrative Grammar. New Literary History, 20 (3), 581-608.

Roe, F. (1905, Jul.). Ibsen as a Dramatist. The Sewanee Review, 13 (3), 305-318.

Ferdinand de, F. (1972). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Edition Critique Payot.

Schleifer, Ronald. (1987). A. J. Greimas and the Nature of Meaning: Linguistics, Semiotics, and Discourse. New South Wales: Providence House.

Seldon, R, &Widdowson, Peter (1993). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. London: British Library Cataloguing.

Segre, Cesare, & John Meddemmen. (1989, Spring). The Style of Greimas and its Transformation. New Literary History, 20 (3), 679-692.

Shaw, G. (1966). Henrik Ibsen: The Lessons of the Plays. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 1-6). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Tyson, Lois. (2006). Critical Theory Today: A User Friendly Guide. Florida: CRC Press.

Van Dijk, Teun. (1972). Aspects d’une théorie générative du texte poétique. In A. J. Greimas (Ed.), Essais de sémiotique poétique (pp. 180-205). Paris: Larousse.

Waugh, P. (2006). Literary Theory and Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. (1966). Ibsen’s Non-Theatrical Plays. In James Walter McFarlane (Ed.), Discussions of Henrik Ibsen (pp. 35-38). Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

Wolfreys, J. (2001). Introducing Literary Theories: A Guide and Glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.68

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.