The Cohesiveness of Personal Reference in Translation: A Case Study of French and English

Mohamed Abdou Moindjie

Abstract


Personal reference is a co-hyponym of textual cohesion; it deals with the first, second and third persons singular or plural; it can occur exophorically, or endophorically as anaphora or cataphora. The present paper is a descriptive study on the cohesiveness and translatability of personal reference; it describes its occurrence and cohesiveness in translating from French into English. In doing so, the analyses are done on literary texts, Madame Bovary and Strait is the Gate. The data related to personal reference are identified and collected throughout reading the whole texts under study; then the data are analyzed. The findings indicate that English language uses more cohesive personal reference than French language due to language peculiarities like abstractness, prolixity in French language; concreteness and conciseness in English language. The research reveals that some shifts which occur in translating personal reference from French into English are obligatory in that they are required by language peculiarities, whereas some shifts which are required by language norms are found to be under the translator’s latitude. The cohesiveness of personal reference, therefore, depends on language peculiarities and language norms of both French and English, which are the determinants of the translation methods of personal reference in translating from French into English.

Keywords


Cohesion, Personal Reference, Language Peculiarities, French Language Norms, English Language Norms, Translation Norms, Translation Procedure Determinants

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, M. (1992, 2011). In other words. London and New York: Routledge

Baker, M. (1993). “Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies: Implications and Applications”. In Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. ( Mona Baker, Gill Francis and Elena Tongnini-Bonelli, eds.), p. 233-250. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing Company.

Blum- Kulka, S. (2000). Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence. In The translation studies reader. (Venuti, L., ed.), p. 298- 313. London and New York : Routledge.

Bosch. P. (1989). Coherence and Cohesion: Comments on Roger G. Van de Velde's Paper “Man, Verbal Text, Inferencing, and Coherence”. In Connexity and coherence. (Heydrich. W., Neubauer. F., Petöfi, J. S. and Sözer, E., eds.), p. 219-227. Berlin and New York: Walter de Cruyter.

Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic theory of translation. London: Oxford University Press.

Charolles, M. (1978). Introduction aux Problemes de la Coherence des Texts. La Journale de la langue française. 38, 7 - 38.

Enkvist, N. E. (1990). Seven Problems in the Study of Coherence and Interpretability in Coherence in writing. (Connor, U. and Johns, A. M., eds.), p. 11-26. Alexandria and Virginia : TESOL.

Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.

Hajjar, J. (2002). Traité de traduction. Beyrouth: Dar-Machreq.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to functional grammar. London and New York: Edward Arnold.

Hechaïmé, C. I. (2002). La Traduction par les textes. Beyrouth: Dar El-Machreq.

Hermans, Theo (1991) “Translational Norms and Correct Translations”. In Translation studies: the state of Art (Kitty, M. van Leuven-Zwart & Ton Naaijkens, eds.), 155-169. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.

Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lemire, G. (2001). Application à la langue française de la theorie de M.A.K. et de R. Hasan. Langue française, vision systematique. WWW. Voila.fr: File: // A: / vision systematique, June 2001.

Moindjie, M. A. (2003). An investigation into the aspect of coherence and cohesion in translation : a case study. MA diss., Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translation with special reference to principles and approaches involved in bible translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Swales, J. (1990). “Non-native Speaker Graduate Engineering Students and Their Introductions: Global coherence and Local Management”. In Coherence in writing. (Connor, U. and Johns, A. M.,eds.), P. 189-207. Alexandria and Virginia: TESOL.

Toury, G. (1980). In search of a theory of translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics.

Trask, R. L. (1997). A student's dictionary of language and linguistics: London: Arnold.

Vinay, J. and Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative stylistics of French and English: a methodology for translation (J. C. Sager and M. J. Hamel, Trans.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Wales, K. (1998). Cohesion and coherence in Literature. In Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics. (Jacob, L. M…), p. 134-136. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Yunxing, L. (1996). The Sentence Group: the key discoursal level in translation teaching. In Teaching translation and interpreting 3 . (Dollerup, C. and Appel, V., eds), p. 111- 117. Amsterdam/ Philapelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.4p.130

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.