A Critical Discourse Analysis of Iranian Sport Media: A Case Study

Mohammad Dabir-Moghadam, Hossein Raeesi

Abstract


Sport media can go beyond reflecting sport events and shape and direct public opinions. However, few, if any, studies have addressed this area in an Iranian context. Therefore, the present study sought to critically analyze Iranian sport media texts by focusing on a particular subject. To do so, a corpus of sampled texts, which reflected official and semi-official stances on the two Iranian footballers’ act of playing against an Israeli team, was analyzed using Fairclough’s three-dimensional model. The findings of the study indicated how speakers use linguistic means to highlight the desired points of view, establish power relations, and control readers’ mind and thinking. The findings also revealed that sport media can be used to strengthen dominant ideologies already legitimatized and approved by sportspeople.

Keywords


Critical Discourse Analysis, Sport Media, Ideology, Power, Iran

Full Text:

PDF

References


Eshaghi, H. & Bye, A. (2014). Examining Iranian football premier league coaches’ strategies to avoid the aftermath of defeats in post-match press conferences: A critical discourse analysis. In M. Dabir-Moghadam (Ed.), Proceedings of the ninth Iranian linguistics conference (pp: 67-80). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabi’ Universsity Press.

Adams, A., Anderson, E. & McCormack, M. (2010). Establishing and Challenging Masculinity: The Influence of Gendered Discourses in Organized Sport. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(3), 278–300.

Baker, P. & Ellece, S. (2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Cotter, C. (2001). Discourse and Media. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (Ed.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 416-436). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: the universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-68.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1999). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In A. Jaworski and N. Coupland (1999), The Discourse Reader (pp.183-211). London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, London: Routledge.

Gravells, J. (2017). Semiotics and Verbal Texts: How the News Media Construct a Crisis. London: Macmillan Publishers.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1974). In R. Hasan, and P.H. Fries (1995), On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1979). Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions. In R. Hasan and P.H. Fries (1995), On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (second

ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition. UK: Routledge.

Hasan, R. (2010). The meaning of not is not in not. In A. Mahboob and N. Knight, Appliable Linguistics: Texts, Contexts, and Meanings. London:Continuum.

Johnston, J. (2013). Media Relations: Issues and Strategies (2nd edition). Australia: ALLEN & UNWIN.

Kelly, J. (2010). Sectarianism and Scottish football: Critical reflections on dominant discourse and press commentary. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(4): 418–435.

McDowell, J. & Schaffner, S. (2011). Football, it’s a man’s game: Insult and gendered discourse in The Gender Bowl, Discourse & Society, 22(5). 547–564.

Stevenson, D. (2002). WOMEN, SPORT, AND GLOBALIZATION: Competing Discourses of Sexuality and Nation, Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 26(2), 209-225.

Teich, E. (1999). Systemic Functional Grammar in natural language generation: Linguistic description and computational representation. London, UK: Cassel.

Thompson, G. (2000). Introducing Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2): 249-283.

Van Dijk, T.A. (1997). Discourse as Interaction in Society. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 1–37). London: Sage.

Wanneberg, P. L. (2011). The sexualization of sport: A gender analysis of Swedish elite sport from 1967 to the present day. European journal of Women’s studies, 18(3):265-278.

Wodak, R. (2001) What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its

developments. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-13).

London: Sage.

Zheng, Shaohui. (2014). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Financial Remarks: A Case Study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 105-116.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.3p.84

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.