The Impact of Metamemory on the EFL Students` Achievement at Taif University

Nasrah Mahmoud Ismaiel

Abstract


The purpose of the current research is to scrutinize the relationship between metamemory and EFL learners` achievement. The participants were 250 first year university students who were chosen from a large sample of the preparatory year Science and Humanities streams at Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia. The objective of the research is twofold: (a) to assess whether metamemory can predict English language skills achievement (listening, speaking, reading, and writing, and (b) to assess if there exist notable discrepancies between male and female students and the different academic streams (the science stream and the humanities stream) on the metamemory factors. Students` metamemory was measured by the Metamemory questionnaire (SMSQ) of Tonkovic and Vranic (2011). The results of this study show that metamemory is a good predictor of the EFL students` language learning skills achievement. It also indicates that there are differences between male and female students on the metamemory factors in favor of females. Furthermore, the findings reaffirm that there are differences between the academic streams, in favor of the science stream.  


Keywords


metamemory, English achievement, EFL college Saudi students, gender differences, academic streams

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhaysony, M. (2017). Language Learning Strategies Use by Saudi EFL Students: The Effect of Duration of English Language Study and Gender. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 18-28, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0701.03

Barbara E. Moely, Kevin A. Santulli, and Nimala Rab ( 1985 ) . Teachers' Expectations for Memory and Metamemory Skills of Elementary Such Childten. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research. Child Development Toronto, N, V ..Ontario, Canada, April 25-28, 1985).'

Belmont, J. M., Butterfield, E. C., & Ferretti, R. P. (1982). To secure transfer of training instruct self-management skills. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) How and how much can intelligence be increased? Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

Beqaie, N. A. (2013). Metamemory and Its Relation to Cognitive Flexibility in a Sample of First Year Students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 14, (3), 329-358.

Borkowski, J. G.; Ryan, E.B.; kurtz, B.E. and Reid, M.K. (1983) Metamemory and metalinguistic development: Correlates of children's intelligence and achievement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21 (5), 393-396

Boucheron, C. (1993). Mémoire, métamémoire et vieillissement. Unpublished thesis, University Nancy 2, France.

Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: a problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, Volume 1, pp. 77–165. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bruce, A. J.; Cox, M. O. (1983). Metamemory and Structure: Spelling. Educational Research Quarterly, 8 (2), 38-43

Callaghan, A. D., Fallon, L.J., Judy, S.E., Lucas, S.A., & Weiler, B.W. (2002). Metamemory as a Function of Gender-Related Stimuli. University of Florida. Retrieved November 4, 2002, from http://www.psych.ufl.edu/levy/96 4.html.

Carr, M. & Borkowski, J. G (1987). Metamemory in Gifted Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 (1 ), 40-44.

Chipman, K., Kimura, D., & Fraser, S. (1998). An Investigation of Sex Differences on Incidental Memory for Verbal and Pictorial Material. Learning & Individual Differences, 10, 259-273.

Dunlosky, J. and Thiede, K.W. (2013). Metamemory. (pp. 283-298) is from The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, edited by Daniel Reisberg (2013), is reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0019

Eisenacher, S. & Zink, M. (2017). The Importance of Metamemory Functioning to the Pathogenesis of Psychosis. Front Psychol. 8, 304.

Flavell, J. H, Wellman, H. M. (1975). Metamemory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (83rd, Chicago, Aug. 30-Sept. 3, 1975)

Fort, I., Adoul, L., Holl, D., Kaddour, J. & Kamel, G. (2004). Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire for Adults and the Elderly. Canadian Journal on Aging/ La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 23 (4), 347 – 357.

Kvavilashvili , L.& Ford, R.M. (2014 ). Metamemory prediction accuracy for simple prospective and retrospective memory tasks in 5-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 127 , 65–81.

Geary, D C 1, Klosterman I H, Adrales K. (1990). Metamemory and academic achievement: testing the validity of a group-administered metamemory battery. J Genet Psychol. 151(4), 439-450.

Grammer, J.K. Purtell, K.M. Coffman, J.L. and Ornestein,P. A. (2012). Relations between Children’s Metamemory and Strategic Performance: Time-Varying Covariates in Early Elementary School. J Exp Child Psychol. 108(1), 139–155.

Hasselhorn, M. (1992). Task dependency and the role of category typicality and metamemory in the development of an organizational strategy. Child Development, 63, 202–214.

Hultsch, D.F., Hertzog, C., Dixon, R.A., & Davidson, H. (1988). Memory self-knowledge and self-efficacy in the aged. In M.L. Howe & C.J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive development in adulthood: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 65–92). New York: Springer.

Kalaimathi, D. H. & Julius, R. A. (2012). Effect of Metamemory Strategies on Learning Bio-Chemical Cycle among Higher Secondary School Students. INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 2(1), 1-5.

Klatzky, R. L., & Forrest, F. H. (1984). Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces. Memory & Cognition, 12, 60–70.

Leal, L. (1987). Investigation of the Relation Between Metamemory and University Students' Examination Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (1), 35-40

Lockl, K, Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the Mind: Links between Theory of Mind and Later Metamemory. Child Development, 78 (1), 148-167

Magno, C.( 2008 ). Reading strategy, amount of writing, metacognition, metamemory, and apprehension as predictors of English written proficiency. Asian EFL Journal: Professional Teaching Articles. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com / abstract =1429342

Schnieder, W., Schlagmuller, M., Vise, M. (1998). The Impact of Metamemory and Domain-Specific Knowledge on Memory Performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13 (1), 91-103.

Sinkavich, F.J. (1991). Metamemory, Study Strategies, and Attributional Style: Cognitive Processes in Classroom Learning. Avalable at ERIC Number: ED331846

Tonkovic , M. & Vranic, A. (2011). Self-evaluation of memory systems: Development of the questionnaire. Aging & Mental Health Vol. ??, No. ?, Month?? 2011, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.569483. Epub 2011 May 23.

Weed, K., Ryan, E. B., & Day, J. (1990). Metamemory and attributions as mediators of strategy use and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 849-855.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.300

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.