A Detailed Analysis over Iranian EFL Teachers’ Beliefs towards Using Pronunciation Software in Teaching English Pronunciation

Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani, Narjes Banou Sabouri


One of the useful ways of teaching English pronunciation is the application of pronunciation software. Pronunciation software supplies a personal and stress-free setting for both teachers and learners through which they can have infinite input, exercise at their own pace, and get feedback through the automatic speech recognition. This study investigated the Iranian teachers’ beliefs towards utilizing pronunciation software in English pronunciation instruction. The researchers applied a qualitative method to investigate the impact of pronunciation software on teachers’ pronunciation instruction. The researchers used a belief questionnaire to choose teachers for the semi-structured interview and distributed it to 28 teachers at the two Islamic Azad Universities of Iran. The researchers chose 14 of them based on their answers to the belief questionnaire. Therefore, these 14 teachers participated in the qualitative aspect of this study. The researchers collected data and analyzed them. Qualitative data analysis was done through reducing and displaying the collected data and drawing conclusions from the collected data. The findings obtained from the qualitative research demonstrated that Iranian university teachers held positive beliefs towards the application of pronunciation software in pronunciation instruction. These positive beliefs provided teaching and learning opportunities and appropriate resources for teachers, met their teaching needs, and solved some of their pronunciation difficulties.


beliefs, Iranian teachers, pronunciation instruction, pronunciation software

Full Text:



Abdolmanafi-Rokni, S. J. (2013). The effect of listening to audio stories on pronunciation of EFL learners. MJAL, 5(2), 69-85. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1988.tb01098.x.

Al-Asmari, A. M. (2005). The use of the Internet among EFL teachers at the colleges of technology in Saudi Arabia. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Ohio, United States. Retrieved January 21, 2011, from Dissertations and Theses: Full Text database (Publication No. AAT 3177167)

Andrew, L. (2007). Comparison of teacher educators’ instructional methods with the constructivist ideal. The Teacher Educator, 42(3), 157–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08878730709555401

Apple Education Inc. (2009). American recovery and reinvestment act—stimulus opportunities for integrating technology with educational goals (whitepaper). Retrieved on 7/9/2011 from http://images.apple.com/education/docs/Apple-Education_StimulusWhite_Paper.pdf.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. USA: Wadsworth.

Attaran, M. (2004). IT modification means. The institution of technological development of Hoshmand School. Tehran, 130-148.

Becker, H. J. (2000). The exemplary teacher’ paper: How it arouses and how it changed its author’s research program. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(2), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss2/seminal/article2.htm

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Derbyshire, H. (2003). Gender issues in the use of computers in education in Africa. Retrieved 12 April 2011 from http://imfundo.digitalbrain.com/imfundo/web/learn/documents/ Gender%20Report.pdf

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. http://www.thenationalacademy.org/Newsletter s/vol1-3.html.

Falba, C. J., Grove, K. J., Anderson, D. G., & Putney, L. G. (2001). Benefits of laptop computers for elementary teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5), 105-114. Retrieved October 24, 2004 from http://www.iste.org/jrte/33/5/falba.cfm.

Farhat, P. A., & Dzakiria, H. (2017). Pronunciation barriers and computer assisted language learning (CALL): Coping the demands of 21st century in second language learning classroom in Pakistan. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(2), 53-62. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.2.53

Fathiyan, M. (2004). The study of a desired pattern of computer literacy for Iranian teachers. The University of Science and Industry, The Ministry of Education, The Design and Develop and Application Office of Information and Communication Technology.

Finely, J. (2004). Pronunciation Power. Copyright Quadrant Educational Enterprises Inc. August 2010. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb/?did=575726031&sid=11&Fmt=3&clientId=27905&RQT=309&VName=PQD.

Fraser, H. (2000). Coordinating improvements in pronunciation teaching for adult learners English as a second language. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.478.

Germann, P., & Sasse, C. M. (1997). Variations in concerns and attitudes of science teachers in an educational technology development program. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2-3), 405-423.

Gooniband Shooshtari, Z., Mehrabi, K., & Mousavinia, S. R. (2013). A call for teaching pronunciation in Iranian schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 454-465.

Haghighi, M., & Rahimy, R. (2017). The effect of L2 minimal pairs practice on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 42-48. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.42

Hardy, J. V. (1998). Teacher attitudes toward and knowledge of computer technology. Computers in the Schools, 14(3-4), 119-136. Doi:10.1300/J025v14n03_11

Hayati, A. M. (2010). Notes on teaching English pronunciation to EFL learners: A case of Iranian high school students. Canadian Center of Science and Education, ELT, 3(4), December 2010. doi: 10.5539/Elt.V3n4p121.

Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(2008), 1499–1509. Retrieved May 07, 2005, from http://ictpolicy.edna.edu.au.

Hişmanoğlu, M. (2010). Online pronunciation resources: Hobbies or fobbies of EFL teachers? IJONTE, 1(2), 40-53. http://www.public.iastate.edu/~jlevis/SPRIS/.

Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2004). Integrating technology in classrooms: We have met the enemy and he is us. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL. http://hokanson.cdes.umn.edu/publications/IntegratingAECT.pdf

Iding, M. K., Crosby, M. E., & Speitel, T. (2002). Teachers and technology: Beliefs and practices. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 153-170.

Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581-597.

Kazu, I. Y., & Yavulzalp, N. (2008). An analysis of the primary school teachers' usage of instructional software. International Journal of Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 45-53.

Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85.

Lam, Y. (2000). Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 389-420. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.3.389.

Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 281-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759390500200208

Mehrpour, S., & Agheshteh, H. (2017). Supervisory feedback efficiency: Developing a framework based on Iranian EFL teachers’ and supervisors’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(3), 24-33.

Mich, O., Neri, A., & Giuliani, D. (2006). The effectiveness of a computer assisted pronunciation training system for young foreign language learners. Proceedings of CALL, 135–143. http://w w w .eurydice.org/Docum ents/KDLANG /2005/EN/Fram eSet.htm.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 51-74. doi: 10.2307/3586981.

Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6

Norton, S., McRobbie, C. J., & Cooper, T. J. (2000). Exploring secondary mathematics teachers' reasons for not using computers in their teaching: Five case studies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 87-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782302

Pourhossein Gilakjani, A. (2014). A Detailed Analysis over Some Important Issues towards Using Computer Technology into the EFL Classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 146-153.

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2016). English pronunciation instruction: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 1-6.

Pourhossein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2014). Change of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Traditional Pedagogical Methods through Using Pronunciation Power Software in the Instruction of English Pronunciation. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 20-29.

Pourhossein Gilakjani, A., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Teachers’ Beliefs in English Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 78-86.

Pourhossein Gilakjani, A., Sabouri, N. B., & Zabihniaemran, A. (2015). What Are the Barriers in the Use of Computer Technology in EFL Instruction? Review of European Studies, 7(11), 213-221.

Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey of schools and teachers. Report # 4. Irvine, California: Centre for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.

Riel, M., & Becker, H. (2000). The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher leaders. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey of schools and teachers. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (1999). Predictors of teachers' confidence in their ability to implement computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(1), 75-97.

Sadeghi, M., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2016). The effect of using phonetic websites on Iranian EFL learners’ word level pronunciation. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 31-37.

Saye, J. W. (1998). Technology in the classroom: The role of disposition in teacher gatekeeping. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 13(3), 210-234. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ562518

Simonsson, M. (2004). Technology use of Hispanic bilingual teachers: A function of their beliefs, attitudes and perceptions on peer technology use in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Technology, 31(3), 257-266. https://www.questia.com/.../technology-use-of-hispanic-bilingual-teachers-a-function

Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253-272. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415.

Wetzel, D. (2002). A model for pedagogical and curricular transformation with technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(2), 43-49. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10402454.2001.10784432

Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.

Woodrow, J. (1991). Teachers' perceptions of computer needs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 475-496. doi: 10.1080/08886504.10781977.

Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5–30. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8455

Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840. doi:10.3102/00028312040004807

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.227


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2018 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.