Stress Assignment in N+N Combinations in Arabic

Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh

Abstract


The validity of stress as a criterion to distinguish between compounds and phrases has been investigated in many languages, including English (see e.g. Lieber 2005: 376; Booij 2012: 84). However, the possibility of using stress as a criterion in this way has not been investigated for Arabic. Siloni (1997: 21) claims that in N+N combinations in Semitic languages, stress always falls on the second element. However, the results of a study using PRAAT reveal that, in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and Jordanian Arabic (JA), stress plays no role in distinguishing between various N+N combinations, i.e. compounds and phrases, e.g.ˈmuʕallim lfiizyaaʔ ‘the physics teacher’ vs.ˈbayt lwalad ‘the boy’s house’, respectively. Analysis shows that the default position of stress in N+N combinations in MSA and JA is on the first element. There is only one systematic exception, which is phonetically conditioned: in N+N combinations with assimilated geminates on the word boundary, a secondary stress or perhaps double stress is assigned.

 


Keywords


stress, Arabic, State Construct (SC), Synthetic Genitive Construction (SGC), phrases, compounds

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2016a). Compounding in Modern Standard Arabic, Jordanian Arabic and English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, UK.

Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2016b). Identifying Arabic compounds other than the Synthetic Genitive Construction. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 63(3), 277-298. doi:10.1556/064.2016.63.3.1.

Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2016c). Headedness in Arabic compounds within the synthetic genitive construction. SAGE Open 6(4), 1-16.

Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2017). ‘Identifying Adj + N compounds in Modern Standard Arabic’. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 70(4).

Abu Abbas, K. (2008). Introducing weight sensitive EDGEMOST. SKY Journal of Linguistics 21.11-36.

Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L. and Stavrou, M. (2007). Noun phrase in the generative perspective (Vol. 71). Walter de Gruyter.

Bamakhramah, M. (2009). Syllable Structure in Arabic Varieties with a Focus on Superheavy Syllables. PhD dissertation: Indiana University.

Bauer, L. (2009). “IE, Germanic: Danish”. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding ed. by Lieber, R and Štekauer, P, 400-16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bell, M. J. and Plag, I. (2013). Informativity and analogy in English compound stress. Word Structure 6(2).129-155. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2013.0042

Booij, G. (2012). The Grammar of Words. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N, and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

Davis, S. (2011). “Geminates”. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. v. 2. Ed. by van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C.J., Hume, E and Rice, K, 837- 859. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.

Don, J. (2009). “IE, Germanic: Dutch”. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding ed. by Lieber, R and Štekauer, P, 370-85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hammond, M. (1999). The Phonology of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heselwood, B. and Watson, J.C.E. (2013). “The Arabic definite article does not assimilate”. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 18.34–53.

Khattab, G., and Al-Tamimi, J. 2014. “Geminate timing in Lebanese Arabic: the relationship between phonetic timing and phonological structure”. Laboratory Phonology 5(2): 231-269.

Kiefer, F. (2009). ‘Uralic, Finno-Ugric: Hungarian’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 527-541.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lieber, R. (2005). “English word-formation processes”. Handbook of Word-Formation. ed. by P. Stekauer and R. Lieber, 375-428. Dordrecht: Springer.

Odden, D. (2005). Introducing Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Plag, I., Kunter, G. and Schramm, M. (2011). ‘Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English’. Journal of Phonetics 39(3): 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.004

Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Siloni, Tal. (1997). Noun Phrases and Nominalizations: The Syntax of Dps. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Spencer, Andrew. (2002). Phonology: Theory and Description. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Szymanek, B. (2009). “IE, Slavonic: Polish”. The Oxford Handbook of Compounding ed. by Lieber, R and Stekauer, P, 464-77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Watson, J.C.E. (2002). The Phonology and Morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zamponi, R. (2009). ‘Arawakan: Maipure-Yavitero’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 584-593.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.6p.83

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2019 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.