The Incidental Acquisition of English Nominal Structures by a Young EFL Learner under Comprehension-based Lessons

Muhlisin Rasuki

Abstract


This paper reports incidental acquisition of English nominal structures by a young EFL learner under comprehension-based lessons. The learner was exposed to a series of English sentences containing the target structures through listen-and-do activities. These activities required that the learner select different items based on the instructions given by the researcher. The exposure took place between 40 and 60 minutes in total spread over 3 days. In the fourth day, the learner was asked to give instructions (in English) to the researcher to select particular items. The learner’s task performance was then transcribed and analyzed using complexity and accuracy measures. The results indicated that comprehension-based lessons were effective in facilitating incidental acquisition the target structures for the learner.

 


Keywords


Second/foreign language (L2) learning, L2 acquisition, young L2 learner, English as a foreign language (EFL), comprehension-based lessons, task-based instruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23-48). Harlow: Longman.

DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language learning, 55(S1), 1-25. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x

Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in second language acquisition, 24(02), 143-188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024

Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 87-105. doi: 10.2307/3587806

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstanding. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x

Ellis, R. (2016). Aunt Sallies and real issues: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Taking it to task, 1(1), 3-8.

Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language learning, 44(3), 449-491. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x

Gass, S. (1997). Input and interaction in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gass, S. & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in second language acquisition, 16(3), 283-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013097

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pegamon.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pegamon.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output?. System, 26(2), 175-182. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00002-5

Leow, R. (2007). Input in the L2 classroom: An attentional perspective on receptive practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 21-50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Loschky, L. & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crooks & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-167). Clevedon, UK: Mulitilingual Matters.

Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(3), 303-323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013103

Long, M. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126

Lambert, C. (2016). Task integrity and task frequency in the L2 classroom. Taking it to task, 1(1), 9-16.

Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Task-based L2 Research: Toward More Developmentally Based Measures of Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 607-614. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu047

Lambert, C., Kormos, J. & Minn, D. (2016). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in second language acquisition, FirstView, 1-30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085

Shintani, N. (2012a). Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process-product study. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 253-279. doi: 10.1177/1362168811431378

Shintani, N. (2012b). Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 39-51. doi: 10.1177/0033688212439322

Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based Tasks in Foreign Language Instruction for Young Learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Shintani, N. & Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of English plural –s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in second language acquisition, 32(4), 607-637. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000288

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2014). Tracking ‘learning behaviours’ in the incidental acquisition of two dimensional adjectives by Japanese beginner learners of L2 English. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 521-542. doi: 10.1177/1362168813519885

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 371-391. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.3.371

VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language learning, 52(4), 755-803. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00203

VanPatten, B. (2015). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 113-134). New York, NY: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.