The Role of the Students in the CLIL Classroom A New Perspective to Identify Types of Tasks

David González Gándara

Abstract


A good deal of authors have spotted the crucial factors to get into account in order to classify tasks for their study. Although the role of the student in the task has been studied before, it has not been considered as a key factor in some of the most influential models. I propose a new perspective to describe it. It consists in a combination of the participation of the students in the input of tasks and their participation in the output. A case study has been carried out to address the statistical effects of the factor proposed in two variables: the amount of As-units (Foster, Tonkyn, & Wigglesworth, 2000) in the L2 produced in the classroom, and among them, the amount of initiating moves (Leech & Weisser, 2003). Transcripts of the audio and video recordings taken during eight CLIL Science lessons taught to an intact class of ten students of grades 1 and 2 were analysed. The results showed that the role of the students in the input had a significant effect on the variables measured. The teacher produced more As-units in general and initiating moves in particular, while the students produced less As-units while still producing more initiating moves.


Keywords


Input, Second Language Acquisition, Task, Bilingual Education, CLIL, role

Full Text:

PDF

References


Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (Vol. 23). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2001.10162800

Tardieu, Claire & Doltisky, Marlene (2012). Integrating the task-based approach to CLIL teaching, in J. de Dios (coord.), Teaching and Learning English through Bilingual Education, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012, pp. 3-35.

Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). “Information gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL QUARTERLY , 20 (2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586546

Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development: A study of classroom interaction and language acquisition. Pergamon.

Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. ERIC.

Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second language acquisition, 18 (03), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100015047

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21 , 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354

Krashen, S. D. (1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26 , 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(98)00002-5

Leech, G., & Weisser, M. (2003). Generic speech act annotation for task-oriented dialogue. In D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Proceedings of the corpus linguistics 2003 conference. Lancaster: UCREL Technical Papers. https://doi.org/10.3115/1118078.1118084

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100009578

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy (Vol. 20). Oxford University Press Oxford.

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied linguistics, 22 (1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a compo nential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43 , 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1

Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 7–26.

Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45 , 161–176.

Salaberri, S. (1999). El discurso del profesor en el aula y su relación con las tareas de aprendizaje. Universidad de Almería.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1 (3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302

Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2011). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 61 (s1), 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00642.x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2020 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.