Roles of the Cited Author in Citations of the Literature Review by EFL Postgraduates

Nayef Jomaa Jomaa, Siti Jamilah Bidin

Abstract


The study analysed the clauses of the integral citations to identify the functional roles of the cited author[1] used by EFL postgraduates. The Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) was adopted in analysing the clauses qualitatively. A purposeful sampling was utilized in choosing the literature review of 20 PhD theses in Information Technology and Applied Linguistics at a public Malaysian university. In terms of the interpersonal meanings, the cited author functions as a ‘Subject’, a ‘Complement’, and an ‘Adjunct’. For the  experiential meanings, the cited author has functions based on the processes types used in each clause, including an ‘Actor’ and a ‘Goal’ with material processes, a ‘Senser’ and a ‘Phenomenon’ with mental processes, a ‘Sayer’ and a ‘Verbiage’ with verbal processes, a ‘Behaver’ with behavioural processes, a ‘Carrier’, a ‘ Carrier: Possessor’, an ‘Attribute’, a ‘Token’, and a ‘Value’ with relational processes, and an ‘Agent: Attributor’ with causative processes. Other functions related to the Circumstantial under the experiential meanings involved an ‘Agent’, a ‘Location (Place)’, a ‘Manner: Comparison’, an ‘Accompaniment’ and a ‘Matter’. Field and tenor affected the role of the cited author; field’s effect was demonstrated by using a higher number of the cited author’s roles in the Applied Linguistics, whereas tenor’s influence was illustrated in assigning similar roles to the cited author in the Applied Linguistics and Information Technology. These results extend the findings of previous studies, help students in using citations in academic writing, and present more outputs about citations that can be employed pedagogically.

 


Keywords


Academic writing, Arab postgraduates, cited Author, integral citations, Systemic Functional Linguistics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Charles, M. (2006a). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation : A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. (25), 310–331.

Charles, M. (2006b). The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses. Applied Linguistics. 27(3), 492-518.

Coffin, C., Curry, M. J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, Th.M., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching Academic Writing. USA and Canada: Routledge.

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. UK: Printer Publishers Ltd.

Gil-Salom, L. & Soler-Monreal, C. (2011). A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD theses. International Journal of English Studies. 11(2), 53–75.

Halliday, M.A.K (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. UK: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.

Hartley, J. (2008). Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics. 41(3), 497–518.

Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). Who ’ s citing whose writings ? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9(2), 102–115.

Hu, G., & Wang, G. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 14, 14–28.

Hyland, K. (1999). Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. Journal of Applied Linguistics. 20(3), 341-367.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: an advanced resource book. London: Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2009a). Writing in the disciplines : Research evidence for specificity. Taiwan International ESP Journal. 1(1), 5–22.

Hyland, K. (2009b). Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Irvin, L. L. (2010). What Is “ Academic ” Writing ? Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing. Vol. (1). Parlor Press.

Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10(3), 152–161.

Maroko, G. M. (2013). Learning about author positioning in written academic discourse. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 1(2), 47–60.

Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review, 62(3), 279-301.

Maxwell, J.A. (2010). Using Numbers in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 16(6), pp. 474-482.

Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2006). Handbook of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach. Buckingham, GBR: McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.com.

Okamura, A. (2008). Citation Forms in Scientific Texts : Similarities and Differences in L1 and L2 Professional Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies. 7(3), 61-81.

Parry, S. (1998). Disciplinary differences in doctoral theses. Higher Education. 36, 273-99

Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London: Continuum.

Petrić, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 6(3), 238–253.

Petrić, B., & Harwood, N. (2013). Task requirements, task representation, and self-reported citation functions : An exploratory study of a successful L2 student’s writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12, 110–124.

Polio, Ch. & Shi, L. (2012). Perceptions and beliefs about textual appropriation and source use in second language writing. Editorial/Journal of Second Language Writing. 21, 95-101.

Rowley-jolivet, E., & Carter-thomas, S. (2014). Citation Practices of Expert French Writers of English: Issues of Attribution and Stance. A.Lyda and K. Warchal (eds.), Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12(4), 299–310.

Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 21(2), 134–148.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2014). Variation in Citational Practice in a Corpus of Student Biology Papers: From Parenthetical Plonking to Intertextual Storytelling. Written Communication. 31(1), 118–141.

Thomas, S., & Hawes, T. P. (1994). Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes. 13(2), 129-148.

Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365–382.

Thompson, P. (2001). A pedagogically-motivated corpus-based examination of PhD theses: macrostructure, citation practices and use of modal verbs. Unpublished thesis submitted for the degree of PhD to School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, The University of Reading, UK.

Thompson, P. (2002). Manifesting intertextuality in the PhD theses. Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses. 44, 97-114.

Thompson, P., & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for Academic Purposes. Language Learning and Technology. 5(3), 91-105.

Yang, L. (2013). Evaluative Functions of Reporting Evidentials in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics. 3(2), 119–126.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.7p.213

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.