A Study of the Validity of English Language Testing at the Higher Secondary Level in Bangladesh

Chowdhury Mohammad Ali, Rebeka Sultana


Validity is considered to be of paramount importance in language testing, and therefore, remains the central concept to all designs and research activities in the field of testing and assessment. Arguably, all researches in language testing are in some senses about validity and the process of validation. In this regard, it is the intent of the present research to investigate the validity of the English language tests employed at the Higher Secondary level in Bangladesh. The research questions addressed concern finding out whether the tests are valid in terms of content and construct. The tests administered at this level are ‘achievement tests’, designed to measure the extent of learning in a prescribed content domain in accordance with explicitly stated objectives of a learning program. The first objective of the study is, therefore, to examine how far the course objectives are reflected in the contents of the existing tests. Secondly, the study makes an assessment of how well these tests measure the abilities they are intended to measure. The findings reveal a great mismatch between what the tests aim at testing and what they actually test. A wide gap is found between the curriculum goals and the existing test format. The study also finds that the Higher Secondary language tests are largely unable to measure the constructs they are based on. The key recommendations to increase the content and construct validity of these tests  include developing  test specifications and designing syllabus in accordance with  course objectives, using direct tests and authentic tasks, sampling widely and unpredictably, arranging  training programs for the language teachers, etc.



Validity, achievement test, test specifications, syllabus, direct test, authentic task

Full Text:



Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C. and Wall, D. (1995). Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological Testing. London: Macmillan.

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. (1981). ‘The construct validation of the FSI oral interview’. Language Learning, 31(1), 67-86.

Canale, M. (1983). Language and Communication. In J. C. Richards and R. W. Schmidt (eds.). London: Longman.

Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980). ‘Theoretical Basis of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing’, Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Douglas, D. (2010). Understanding Language Testing. Routledge. New York.

Ebel, R. L. and Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement. 5th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical Language Testing. London, UK: Hodder Education.

Fulcher, G. and Davidson, F. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment: An Advanced Resource Book. London and New York: Routledge.

Gifford, B. (1989). Test Policy and Test Performance: Education, Language, and Culture. University of California, Berkeley.

Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a Second Language. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Harrison, A. (1983). A Language Testing Handbook. Hong Kong: Macmillan Publisherss Ltd.

Heaton, G.B. (1975). Writing English Language Tests. Second edition. London: Longman.

Henning, G. (1987). A Guide to Language Testing: Development, Evaluation, Research. Cambridge, MA: Newberry House.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hymes, D. (1972). ‘On Communicative Competence’. In Pride J. B. J. and J. Holmes (eds), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269-93.

Islam, J. et. al. (2002). Teacher’s Guide. ELTIP in Association with the British Council.

Kabir, M. H. (2009). ‘How Validity is Ensured in Our Language Test: A Case Study’, IIUC STUDIES, 5, 37-52.

Kane, M. T. (2006). ‘Validation’. In Brennan, R. L. (ed.), Educational Measurement. 4th edition. New York: American Council on Education/Praeger, 17-64.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioural Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

McNamara, T. F. (2000). Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morrow, K. E. (1979). ‘Communicative Language Testing: Revolution or Evolution?’ In Brumfit, C. J. and Johnson K (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

National Curriculum- English: Classes XI & XII. Dhaka: NCTB. pp. 134-153.

Oller, J. W. (1976). ‘Language Testing.’ In Wardhaugh, R. and Brown, H. D. (eds) A Survey of Applied Linguistics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative Language Testing. New York: Prentice Hall.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.6p.64


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.