Philanthropic Discourse vs Promotional Genre: To Study the Rhetorical Choices of Promotion and Structural Moves of Two Appeal Letters in Hong Kong

Patrick Chi-wai LEE

Abstract


Based on two appeal letters from (i) Oxfam Hong Kong and (ii) Hong Kong Committee For United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), this paper aims to study the rhetorical choices of promotion and structural moves of two appeal letters, exploring whether the philanthropic discourse can be viewed in line with the promotional genre. The findings appear to reveal that there is a hybrid form of promotional genre in philanthropic discourse, with reference to Bhatia’s (1998) generic patterns in fund-raising discourse framework. There are similar structural moves of advertising, although the move sequences could vary. However, the move of “introducing the cause” is always found at the very beginning because the readers are more interested to realise what the main theme of the appeal letter is. In addition, appeal letters are found to be modelled in promotional genre, in which they are rhetorical choices of promotion attracting attention from readers – by using “you” and marked devices of attention getters. The findings in this study appear to be in line with the argument that promotional concerns have influenced the nature of philanthropic discourse.

 


Keywords


Appeal letters, Hong Kong, promotional genre, rhetorical choices of promotion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bhatia, V. K., (1997). Genre-mixing in academic introductions, English for Specific Purposes, 16, 3, 181-196.

Bhatia, V. K. (1998). Generic patterns in fundraising discourse, New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising. 22, 95–110.

Bhatia, V.K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view, London and New York: Continuum.

Bhatia, V.K. (2008). Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice’, English for Specific Purposes 27, 161-74.

Bhatia, V.K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in professional communication’, Discourse and Communication, 4/1, 32-50.

Clarke, S. & Norton, M. (1997). The complete fundraising handbook. London: Directory of social change.

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society. 4 (2): 133-68.

Featherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage.

Mann, W. & Thompson, S. (1992). Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rotzoll, K. B., Haefner, J. E., & Sandage, C. H. (1986). Advertising in contemporary society. West Chicago, IL: South-Western Publishing Company.

Smith, G. (1996). Asking properly: The art of creative metaphor. San Diego: Academic Press.

Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press

Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.

Weinstein, S. (2009). The complete guide to fundraising management. N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.

Wharton, C. (2015). Advertising: Critical approaches. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.