The Influence of Writing Beliefs on Two Chinese EFL University Students’ Use of Peer Feedback: An Ecological Perspective

Ma Jingjing

Abstract


Despite the increasing popularity of peer feedback in EFL writing classrooms, little research has been conducted to explore how individual factors such as learner beliefs may influence L2 students’ use of peer feedback. From an ecological perspective (van Lier, 2000, 2004), this exploratory case study investigated the extent of peer feedback use by two purposefully-chosen Chinese EFL university students and how their use of feedback was mediated by learner beliefs, a salient factor that emerged from the study. Detailed qualitative data were collected from multiple sources: written documents, stimulated recall, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations. The findings indicated that the two students integrated peer comments selectively into their revision across two tasks. The selective use of peer feedback was found to be mediated by writing beliefs related to qualities of good English expository writing, to the importance of word limit and to student reviewer roles. Seen from an ecological perspective (van Lier, 2000, 2004), these writing beliefs were employed by the students to create affordances to mediate the use of feedback while some of these beliefs were shaped by local classroom affordances (Peng, 2011). Pedagogical implications of the findings are also discussed. 

 


Keywords


Chinese EFL university students, use of peer feedback, writing beliefs, ecological perspective, affordances

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, L. (1996). The evolution of a learner's beliefs about language learning. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 13, 67-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_1

Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.) Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches (pp. 7—33). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Barcelos, A. M. F. & Kalaja, P. (2011). Introduction to Beliefs about SLA Revisited. System, 39, 281-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.001

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence, Erlbaum.

Ellis, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 335--349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544

Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.

Hyland, F. (1998). The Impact of Teacher Written Feedback on Individual Writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7: 255--286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90017-0

Hyland, F. (2010) Future directions on feedback in second language writing: Overview and future research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 171-182.

Kim, T. Y. (2013). An activity theory analysis of second language motivational self-system: Two Korean immigrants’ ESL learning. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 459-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0045-x

Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009

Lei, X. (2008) Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 217-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.04.001

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Lockhart, C. & Ng, P. (1995). Analysing talk in peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 45, 605-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x

Min, H. T. (2003). Why peer comments fail. English Teaching and Learning, 27, 85-103.

Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing,15, 118-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003

Navarro, D., & Thornton, K. (2011). Investigating the relationship between belief and action in self-directed language learning. System, 39, 290-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.002

Paulus, T. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9

Peng, J. E. (2011). Changes in language learning beliefs during a transition to tertiary study: The mediation of classroom affordances. System, 39, 314--324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.004

Porte, G. (1997). The etiology of poor second language writing: The influence of perceived teacher preferences on second language revision strategies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 61--78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90006-0

Riley, P. (1997). The guru and the conjurer: Aspects of counselling for self-access. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 114—131). New York: Longman.

Riley, P. (2009). Shifts in beliefs about second language learning. RELC Journa,l 40, 102-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688208101448

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Students' engagement with feedback on writing: The role of learner agency/beliefs. In R. Batstone (Ed.) Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp.167—185). New York: Oxford University Press.

Tsui, A., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9

van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning 245-259. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System, 27, 537-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00049-4

Wan, W. (2014). Constructing and developing ESL students’ beliefs about writing through metaphor: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 53-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.002

Wenden, A. (1987). How to be a successful language learner: Insights and prescriptions from second language learners. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.) Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 103—117). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

White, C. (1999). Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners. System, 27, 443-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00044-5

Woods, D. (2003). The social construction of beliefs in the language classroom. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.) Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 201—230). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_9

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a

Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15,179-200.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004

Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15, 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.247

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.