Acquiring the English Causative Alternation: Evidence from the University of Jordan

Aseel Zibin, Abdel Rahman Altakhaineh


The main objective of the current study was to test whether Advanced Jordanian EFL learners have acquired the English causative alternation. To this end, we used a Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT) to determine whether the participants would be able distinguish between alternating and non-alternating causative/inchoative verbs. The verbs used in the GJT were chosen based on their frequency in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). The sample of the study consisted of eighty advanced Jordanian EFL learners, studying English Language and Literature at the University of Jordan. The results revealed that the participants have not acquired the English causative alternation (total mean=61%). Specifically, the results showed that the participants encountered some difficulties with certain verbs that do not alternate and were used ungrammatically on the GJT. We proposed that these difficulties could be attributed to the differences between English and Jordanian Arabic (JA) in terms of the semantically-based constraints that govern the causative-inchoative alternation in English and JA. The participants transferred the argument structure of verbs in JA into English without realising that the two languages are different in terms of the verbs that are allowed to alternate and those that are not. The study concludes with recommendations for further research.

Keywords: C


Lexical semantics, causative-inchoative alternation, argument structure, second language acquisition, Jordanian EFL learners

Full Text:



Alotaibi, A. M., & Alajmi, H. (2015). The Acquisition of the Passive Alternation by Kuwaiti EFL Learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(1), 44-52.

Altakhaineh, A., & Rahrouh, H. (2015). The Use of Euphemistic Expressions by Arab EFL Learners: Evidence from Al Ain University of Science and Technology. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(1), 14-21.

Altakhaineh, A., & Zibin, A. (2014a). Perception of culturally loaded words by Arab EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, 6 (3), 1-22.

Altakhaineh, A., & Zibin, A. (2014b). Phonologically Conditioned Morphologically Process in Modern Standard Arabic: An Analysis of Al-ibdal 'Substitution' in ftaʕal Pattern Using Prosodic Morphology. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 2 (1), 1-16.

Al-Wahaib, M. A. (2004). The acquisition of the English locative alternation by Jordanian EFL learners. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Jordan.

Ammon, M. S. H. (1980). Development in the linguistic expression of causal relations: Comprehension of features of lexical and periphrastic causatives. Berkeley: University of California. (PhD dissertation).

Anderssen, M., Rodina, Y., Mykhaylyk, R. and Fikkert, P. (2014). The Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in Norwegian. Language Acquisition, 21(1), 72-102.

Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic Theory and the Projection Problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 533–581.

Choi, M. H., & Lakshmanan, U. (2002). Holism and locative argument structure in Korean-English bilingual grammars. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S. & Do, A. H.J (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 95-106). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Coppock, E. (2009). The logical and empirical foundations of Baker's paradox. PhD thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Croft, W. (1990). Possible verbs and the structure of events. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meaning and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization (pp.48–73). London: Routledge.

Erdoğan, V. (2005). Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language Learning. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1, 261-270.

Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Hamdan, J. (1994). Language transfer and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by native speakers of Arabic. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Reading, UK.

Haspelmath, M., Calude, A., Spagnol, M., Narrog, H., & Bamyaci, E. (2014). Coding Causal–Noncausal Verb Alternations: A Form–Frequency Correspondence Explanation. Journal of Linguistics, 50(03), 587-625.

Helms-Park, R. 2001. Evidence of Lexical Transfer in Learner Syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(01), 71-102.

Koontz-Garboden, A. (2009). Anticausativisation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, 77-138.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1992). An introduction to second language research (2nd ed). London: Longman.

Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1994). A Preliminary Analysis of Causative Verbs in English. Lingua, 92, 35– 77.

Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2011). Conceptual categories and linguistic categories. (handouts de LSA Linguistic Institute, University of Colorado.)

Mazurkerwich, I. (1984). The Acquisition of the Dative Alternation by Second Language Learners and Linguistic Theory. Language Learning, 34, 91-108.

Meisel, J. M. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second language research, 13(3), 227 263.

Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistics methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Tremblay, A. (2005). Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgment tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies, 24(1), 129-167.

Wolff, P. (2003). Direct Causation in the Linguistic Coding and Individuation of Causal Events. Cognition, 88(1), 1-48.

Zibin, A., & Altakhaineh, A. (2014). Informativity of Arabic Proverbs in Context: An Insight into Palestinian discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(1), 67-83.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2022 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.